Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SHOP vs PYPL vs AMZN vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
SHOP vs PYPL vs AMZN vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $145.00B | $40.77B | $2.92T | $48.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.37B | $33.17B | $742.78B | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.33B | $5.06B | $90.80B | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | 46.6% | 50.6% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | 18.3% | 11.5% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 60.9x | 8.7x | 34.8x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $188M | $9.99B | $152.99B | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.53B | $8.05B | $86.81B | $1.87B |
SHOP vs PYPL vs AMZN vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 233.7 | +133.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHOP vs PYPL vs AMZN vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.1%, EPS growth -39.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3%
PYPL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 49.3%, current ratio 1.29x
- PEG 0.98 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 17.4x)
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 11.5% ROA vs PYPL's 6.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 15.0%
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- 17.6% margin vs SHOP's 10.8%
- Beta 0.73 vs SHOP's 2.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 17.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs SHOP's 10.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PYPL's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.2% vs PYPL's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs PYPL's 6.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 15.0% |
SHOP vs PYPL vs AMZN vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHOP vs PYPL vs AMZN vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories
PYPL leads 1 • SHOP leads 1 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 64.0x EBAY's $11.6B. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHOP's 10.8%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $33.2B | $742.8B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $6.7B | $155.9B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $5.1B | $90.8B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.1B | $5.5B | -$2.5B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +46.6% | +50.6% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +18.3% | +11.5% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +15.8% | +12.2% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +16.8% | -0.3% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.3% | — | +16.6% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | -6.2% | +74.8% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 93% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.97x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145.0B | $40.8B | $2.92T | $48.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $143.7B | $42.7B | $2.98T | $54.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 118.87x | 8.54x | 37.82x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 60.91x | 8.71x | 34.77x | 17.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.06x | 0.97x | 1.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 95.83x | 6.08x | 20.47x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.55x | 1.23x | 4.07x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.82x | 2.21x | 7.14x | 10.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.25x | 7.33x | 378.98x | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHOP leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $11 for SHOP. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs EBAY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.5% | +25.1% | +23.3% | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | +6.3% | +11.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +15.0% | +14.7% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | +18.1% | +15.3% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.49x | 0.37x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $1.9B | $66.2B | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $8.0B | $86.8B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $10.0B | $153.0B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 19.28x | 39.96x | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, EBAY leads with a +54.2% total return vs PYPL's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs PYPL's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.9% | -20.3% | +19.7% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.2% | -32.3% | +43.7% | +54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.6% | -38.4% | +156.2% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | -81.6% | +64.8% | +86.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4123.0% | +17.4% | +697.8% | +369.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.2% | -14.9% | +36.8% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs PYPL's 58.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 1.39x | 1.51x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $182.19 | $79.50 | $278.56 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.14 | $38.46 | $185.01 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +58.1% | +97.3% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.7 | 40.9 | 81.1 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.7M | 15.4M | 45.5M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
EBAY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHOP as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, EBAY offers the higher dividend yield at 1.08% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $164.75 | $51.67 | $306.77 | $109.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 63 | 70 | 94 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +14.8% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PYPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SHOP vs PYPL vs AMZN vs EBAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shopify Inc. (SHOP) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PayPal Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus PYPL's +17. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 259% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PayPal Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 35. 6% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus 10. 7% for Shopify Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 52. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SHOP, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHOP or PYPL or AMZN or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHOP and PYPL and AMZN and EBAY?
These companies operate in different sectors (SHOP (Technology) and PYPL (Financial Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EBAY pays a dividend while SHOP, PYPL, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.