Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SHPH vs SENS vs NVCR vs AGEN vs ATNM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SHPH vs SENS vs NVCR vs AGEN vs ATNM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4M | $224M | $1.92B | $132M | $38M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $42M | $674M | $114M | $90K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-88M | $-173M | $115K | $-35M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.0% | 75.2% | 35.7% | -8.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -204.4% | -27.2% | -17.7% | -414.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 1.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $41M | $290M | $10M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $41M | $103M | $3M | $73M |
SHPH vs SENS vs NVCR vs AGEN vs ATNM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shuttle Pharmaceuti… (SHPH) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Senseonics Holdings… (SENS) | 100 | 15.1 | -84.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| Actinium Pharmaceut… (ATNM) | 100 | 17.4 | -82.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHPH vs SENS vs NVCR vs AGEN vs ATNM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHPH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 1.24 vs AGEN's 2.72
SENS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 56.9%, EPS growth 33.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 56.9% revenue growth vs ATNM's -100.0%
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 30.3% 10Y total return vs SENS's -91.5%
AGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 0.1% margin vs ATNM's -384.4%
- +27.1% vs SHPH's -89.1%
- 0.1% ROA vs SHPH's -253.9%
ATNM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.40
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 4.8%, current ratio 9.14x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 9.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.9% revenue growth vs ATNM's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs ATNM's -384.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.1% vs SHPH's -89.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs SHPH's -253.9% |
SHPH vs SENS vs NVCR vs AGEN vs ATNM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SHPH vs SENS vs NVCR vs AGEN vs ATNM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGEN leads in 3 of 6 categories
SHPH leads 0 • SENS leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • ATNM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVCR and SHPH operate at a comparable scale, with $674M and $0 in trailing revenue. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATNM's -384.4%. On growth, SENS holds the edge at +87.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $42M | $674M | $114M | $90,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$84M | -$165M | -$10M | -$37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$88M | -$173M | $115,000 | -$35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$81M | -$48M | -$159M | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.0% | +75.2% | +35.7% | -8.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.0% | -27.2% | -17.7% | -414.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | -25.7% | +0.1% | -384.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -190.6% | -7.1% | -139.1% | -278.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +87.2% | +12.3% | +27.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -183.8% | -77.5% | -100.0% | +85.3% | +56.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $224M | $1.9B | $132M | $38M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $225M | $2.1B | $140M | -$33M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -3.23x | -13.80x | -1102.94x | -0.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 1.79x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.35x | 2.92x | 1.16x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.28x | 3.66x | 5.51x | — | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NVCR and AGEN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVCR delivers a -50.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-51 in annual profit, vs $-5 for SHPH. ATNM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHPH's 1.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SENS scores 6/9 vs SHPH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.8% | -131.5% | -50.8% | — | -151.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -67.9% | -16.5% | +0.1% | -52.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.6% | -3.2% | -16.4% | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | -83.6% | -28.9% | — | -59.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.65x | 0.68x | 0.85x | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$746,672 | $822,000 | $187M | $7M | -$71M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $41M | $103M | $3M | $73M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $41M | $290M | $10M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -50.60x | -4.38x | -96.80x | 1.11x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SENS and NVCR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATNM five years ago would be worth $1,674 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SHPH. Over the past 12 months, AGEN leads with a +27.1% total return vs SHPH's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SENS at -26.4% vs SHPH's -86.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -61.0% | -9.0% | +28.3% | +16.1% | -10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.1% | -61.2% | +1.1% | +27.1% | -12.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -60.1% | -75.7% | -88.2% | -85.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -85.8% | -91.3% | -93.9% | -83.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -91.5% | +30.3% | -94.3% | -97.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -86.0% | -26.4% | -37.6% | -51.0% | -47.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHPH and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHPH is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs SHPH's 6.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 2.07x | 2.20x | 2.72x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.25 | $14.96 | $20.06 | $7.34 | $1.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $4.79 | $9.82 | $2.71 | $0.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.3% | +35.8% | +83.9% | +51.1% | +62.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 34.5 | 69.8 | 48.8 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 840K | 625K | 1.5M | 814K | 184K |
Analyst Outlook
AGEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SENS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 67.9% for SENS (target: $9).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.00 | $33.50 | $7.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 15 | 11 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
AGEN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
SHPH vs SENS vs NVCR vs AGEN vs ATNM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHPH or SENS or NVCR or AGEN or ATNM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
(SENS) is the stronger pick with 56. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ATNM). Analysts rate Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SHPH or SENS or NVCR or AGEN or ATNM?
Over the past 5 years, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ATNM) delivered a total return of -83. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (SHPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +30. 3% versus SHPH's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SHPH or SENS or NVCR or AGEN or ATNM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
(SHPH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 120% more volatile than SHPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ATNM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 165% for Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SHPH or SENS or NVCR or AGEN or ATNM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
(SENS) is pulling ahead at 56. 9% versus -100. 0% for Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ATNM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2159. 3% for Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SENS leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SHPH or SENS or NVCR or AGEN or ATNM?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -384. 4% for Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHPH leads at 0. 0% versus -414. 9% for ATNM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGEN leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SHPH or SENS or NVCR or AGEN or ATNM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99.
0% to $33. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — SHPH or SENS or NVCR or AGEN or ATNM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SHPH or SENS or NVCR or AGEN or ATNM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
(SHPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHPH: -100. 0%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SHPH and SENS and NVCR and AGEN and ATNM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SENS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATNM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.