Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SKK vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
SKK vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $9M | $2.93B | $3.73B | $149M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $13.07B | $17.17B | $14.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $2.80B | $6.89B | $1.61B |
| Gross Margin | 25.1% | 79.3% | 61.8% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -19.2% | 19.4% | 43.9% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.6x | 0.5x | 0.4x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $34M | $1.65B | $5.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $732K | $4.67B | $4.45B | $2.25B |
SKK vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKK Holdings Limited (SKK) | 100 | 11.0 | -89.0% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 40.1 | -59.9% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKK vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth -100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.4%
- 14.6% revenue growth vs FINV's 3.7%
- Beta 0.04 vs LX's 1.26
- -27.3% vs LX's -69.5%
FINV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 4.31x
- 4.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs QFIN's 9.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
QFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 15.7% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.0%
- PEG 0.02 vs FINV's 0.19
- Beta 1.20, yield 9.3%, current ratio 2.45x
- 36.5% margin vs SKK's -22.6%
LX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (0.4x vs 0.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs FINV's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.4x vs 0.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs SKK's -22.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs LX's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs QFIN's 9.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -27.3% vs LX's -69.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs SKK's -10.2%, ROIC 23.1% vs -11.9% |
SKK vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKK vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
LX leads 1 • FINV leads 1 • SKK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 1325.6x SKK's $13M. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKK's -22.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $13.1B | $17.2B | $14.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $3.3B | $8.0B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $2.8B | $6.9B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $1.5B | $10.8B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +79.3% | +61.8% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +19.4% | +43.9% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.6% | +18.2% | +36.5% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -43.6% | +21.9% | +53.5% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.1% | -9.7% | +110.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, QFIN trades at a 45% valuation discount to FINV's 3.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.10x vs FINV's 1.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $2.9B | $3.7B | $149M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $2.2B | $3.3B | $592M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 3.89x | 2.14x | 2.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.65x | 0.47x | 0.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.14x | 0.10x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.83x | 2.97x | 1.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 1.53x | 1.48x | 0.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.93x | 0.60x | 0.56x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.96x | 2.76x | 1.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-40 for SKK. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKK's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs SKK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.0% | +17.4% | +28.8% | +14.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.2% | +11.2% | +12.2% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.9% | +12.9% | +23.1% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.2% | +13.8% | +35.6% | +19.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.64x | 0.00x | 0.07x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | -$4.6B | -$2.8B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $732,000 | $4.7B | $4.5B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $34M | $1.7B | $5.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.85x | — | — | 153.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FINV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FINV five years ago would be worth $10,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $889 for SKK. Over the past 12 months, SKK leads with a -27.3% total return vs LX's -69.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FINV at 13.7% vs SKK's -55.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +86.8% | +4.9% | -22.8% | -29.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.3% | -34.1% | -64.0% | -69.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | +46.8% | +0.3% | +10.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | +1.4% | -15.2% | -63.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | -47.0% | +15.7% | -73.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.4% | +13.7% | +0.1% | +3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SKK and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SKK is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LX's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FINV currently trades 47.4% from its 52-week high vs LX's 22.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 1.14x | 1.20x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.95 | $10.90 | $47.00 | $9.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $4.50 | $12.30 | $2.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.0% | +47.4% | +28.0% | +22.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 54.3 | 47.2 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 797K | 1.3M | 1.4M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FINV and QFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FINV as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy", LX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 114.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 14.9% for FINV (target: $6). For income investors, QFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.30% vs FINV's 4.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.94 | $28.15 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.8% | +9.3% | +6.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.67 | $8.32 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +11.7% | 0.0% |
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SKK vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SKK Holdings Limited (SKK) is the stronger pick with 14.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for FinVolution Group (FINV). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FinVolution Group (FINV) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX?
On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus FinVolution Group at 3. 9x. On forward P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qfin Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 02x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX?
Over the past 5 years, FinVolution Group (FINV) delivered a total return of +1.
4%, compared to -91. 1% for SKK Holdings Limited (SKK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +15. 7% versus SKK's -91. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SKK Holdings Limited (SKK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. 's 1. 26β — meaning LX is approximately 3021% more volatile than SKK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 164% for SKK Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SKK Holdings Limited (SKK) is pulling ahead at 14.
6% versus 3. 7% for FinVolution Group (FINV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for SKK Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -22. 6% for SKK Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -19. 2% for SKK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FINV leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) trades at 0. 4x forward P/E versus 0. 6x for FinVolution Group — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 114. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX?
In this comparison, QFIN (9.
3% yield), LX (6. 8% yield), FINV (4. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SKK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKK or FINV or QFIN or LX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SKK Holdings Limited (SKK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKK: -91. 1%, LX: -73. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKK and FINV and QFIN and LX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKK (Industrials) and FINV (Financial Services) and QFIN (Financial Services) and LX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock. FINV, QFIN, LX pay a dividend while SKK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.