Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKWD vs ACGL vs MKL vs ERIE vs HIG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Diversified
SKWD vs ACGL vs MKL vs ERIE vs HIG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $2.03B | $33.67B | $22.52B | $10.01B | $36.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $19.93B | $16.57B | $4.33B | $28.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $174M | $4.40B | $1.77B | $571M | $4.06B |
| Gross Margin | 43.7% | 37.2% | 61.4% | 18.1% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 25.0% | 13.9% | 17.0% | 13.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 10.1x | 16.0x | 17.1x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $120M | $2.73B | $4.30B | $0.00 | $4.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $169M | $993M | $3.96B | $346M | $133M |
SKWD vs ACGL vs MKL vs ERIE vs HIG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skyward Specialty I… (SKWD) | 100 | 245.9 | +145.9% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 146.9 | +46.9% |
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 127.7 | +27.7% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
| The Hartford Financ… (HIG) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKWD vs ACGL vs MKL vs ERIE vs HIG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKWD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 41.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.5%
- 23.2% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.1x)
ACGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 324.0% 10Y total return vs HIG's 233.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- PEG 0.35 vs ERIE's 1.26
- Combined ratio 0.8 vs SKWD's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
MKL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 2.7%
- 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HIG's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ERIE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- 17.3% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 29.5% vs 10.7%
HIG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.6% vs ERIE's -38.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.2% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs SKWD's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs SKWD's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HIG's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.6% vs ERIE's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 29.5% vs 10.7% |
SKWD vs ACGL vs MKL vs ERIE vs HIG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKWD vs ACGL vs MKL vs ERIE vs HIG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
SKWD leads 1 • ERIE leads 1 • MKL leads 0 • HIG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKWD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIG is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.8B annually — 19.6x SKWD's $1.5B. ACGL is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKL's 10.7%. On growth, SKWD holds the edge at +26.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $19.9B | $16.6B | $4.3B | $28.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $225M | $5.2B | $2.5B | $786M | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $174M | $4.4B | $1.8B | $571M | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $475M | $6.1B | $2.2B | $537M | $5.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +37.2% | +61.4% | +18.1% | +35.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +25.0% | +13.9% | +17.0% | +13.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +22.1% | +10.7% | +13.2% | +14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +30.7% | +13.2% | +12.4% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.6% | +7.3% | +6.7% | +2.3% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +194.3% | +39.0% | -2.6% | +7.9% | +40.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ACGL trades at a 60% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACGL offers better value at 0.29x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $33.7B | $22.5B | $10.0B | $36.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $35.4B | $22.9B | $9.7B | $40.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.18x | 8.13x | 10.64x | 20.41x | 9.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.37x | 10.05x | 15.99x | 17.15x | 10.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.29x | 0.43x | 1.50x | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.00x | 6.85x | 7.78x | 12.14x | 7.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 1.69x | 1.36x | 2.46x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 1.47x | 1.20x | 5.00x | 2.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.03x | 5.50x | 8.82x | 17.53x | 6.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ERIE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ERIE delivers a 25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $10 for MKL. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIG's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIG scores 9/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.1% | +19.0% | +9.6% | +25.0% | +22.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +5.9% | +3.0% | +17.3% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | +15.4% | +10.7% | +29.5% | +16.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +11.6% | +14.9% | +32.0% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.11x | 0.23x | — | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49M | $1.7B | $339M | -$346M | $4.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $169M | $993M | $4.0B | $346M | $133M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $120M | $2.7B | $4.3B | $0 | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 29.18x | 34.86x | 12.00x | — | 20.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,482 for ERIE. Over the past 12 months, HIG leads with a +5.6% total return vs ERIE's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKWD at 27.2% vs ERIE's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | +0.7% | -15.5% | -20.9% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.7% | +2.0% | -4.1% | -38.7% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.0% | +30.7% | +31.0% | -0.2% | +96.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.3% | +144.0% | +47.5% | +14.8% | +112.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.3% | +324.0% | +89.3% | +171.6% | +233.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | +9.3% | +9.4% | -0.1% | +25.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACGL and HIG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKWD's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HIG currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs ERIE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.02x | 0.44x | 0.16x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.05 | $103.39 | $2207.59 | $380.67 | $144.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.60 | $82.45 | $1719.41 | $210.06 | $119.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.0% | +91.4% | +81.5% | +56.9% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 46.3 | 34.5 | 33.6 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 410K | 1.9M | 59K | 231K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKL and HIG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKWD as "Buy", ACGL as "Buy", MKL as "Hold", HIG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.1% upside for SKWD (target: $71) vs 8.3% for MKL (target: $1950). For income investors, MKL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.70% vs HIG's 1.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.60 | $104.00 | $1950.00 | — | $152.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 34 | 15 | — | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +2.7% | +2.2% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 6 | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 | $48.55 | $4.83 | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.6% | +1.9% | 0.0% | +4.4% |
ACGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). SKWD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SKWD vs ACGL vs MKL vs ERIE vs HIG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) is the stronger pick with 23. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG?
On trailing P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Arch Capital Group Ltd. wins at 0. 35x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to +14. 8% for Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +324. 0% versus MKL's +89. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning SKWD is approximately 3795% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 23% for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) is pulling ahead at 23. 2% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. grew EPS 41. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKWD leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG?
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 12. 0% for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACGL leads at 25. 0% versus 15. 3% for SKWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKWD: 55. 1% to $70. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG?
In this comparison, MKL (2.
7% yield), ERIE (2. 2% yield), HIG (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SKWD, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKWD or ACGL or MKL or ERIE or HIG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 2% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ERIE: +171. 6%, SKWD: +138. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKWD and ACGL and MKL and ERIE and HIG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKWD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MKL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HIG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MKL, ERIE, HIG pay a dividend while SKWD, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.