Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYH vs FLYW vs EVTC vs RAMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
SKYH vs FLYW vs EVTC vs RAMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $418M | $2.06B | $1.48B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $188.60B | $951M | $796M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $12.54B | $133M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 0.2% | 46.4% | 70.4% |
| Operating Margin | -87.5% | 5.7% | 19.1% | 7.1% |
| Forward P/E | 110.3x | 41.5x | 6.1x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.13B | $36M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $330M | $306M | $413M |
SKYH vs FLYW vs EVTC vs RAMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sky Harbour Group C… (SKYH) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 50.2 | -49.8% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 55.2 | -44.8% |
| LiveRamp Holdings, … (RAMP) | 100 | 60.5 | -39.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYH vs FLYW vs EVTC vs RAMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 86.6%, EPS growth 105.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 146.2%
- 86.6% revenue growth vs EVTC's 10.2%
FLYW is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +54.9% vs EVTC's -31.8%
EVTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 0.8%
- 94.4% 10Y total return vs RAMP's 32.6%
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.2x)
- 13.9% margin vs SKYH's -17.8%
RAMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 2.65x
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 2.65x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.6% revenue growth vs EVTC's 10.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs SKYH's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs FLYW's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs EVTC's -31.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs SKYH's -0.8%, ROIC 10.2% vs 0.4% |
SKYH vs FLYW vs EVTC vs RAMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYH vs FLYW vs EVTC vs RAMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EVTC leads in 3 of 6 categories
SKYH leads 1 • FLYW leads 0 • RAMP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FLYW and EVTC and RAMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 7817.7x SKYH's $24M. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKYH's -17.8%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $188.6B | $951M | $796M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $10.8B | $316M | $71M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $12.5B | $133M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | -$15.8B | $165M | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +0.2% | +46.4% | +70.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.5% | +5.7% | +19.1% | +7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.8% | +6.6% | +13.9% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -8.4% | +17.4% | +21.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.2% | +1408.6% | +8.4% | +8.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.5% | +4.0% | -24.0% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EVTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 93% valuation discount to FLYW's 156.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EVTC's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RAMP's 68.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $418M | $2.1B | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $397M | $1.7B | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 110.33x | 156.64x | 10.91x | -2510.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.52x | 6.14x | 13.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.21x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.25x | 46.20x | 7.47x | 68.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.16x | 3.30x | 1.59x | 2.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.49x | 2.64x | 2.17x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.81x | 10.92x | 12.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SKYH. RAMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVTC's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs SKYH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +5.9% | +18.7% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +4.3% | +6.1% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +2.1% | +10.2% | +0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +1.3% | +10.5% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.58x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$330M | $824M | -$377M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $330M | $306M | $413M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $1.1B | $36M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.43x | 1.84x | 3.10x | 31.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKYH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKYH five years ago would be worth $9,890 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,909 for FLYW. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +54.9% total return vs EVTC's -31.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKYH at 22.5% vs FLYW's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | +24.0% | -16.1% | +10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.3% | +54.9% | -31.8% | +8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.9% | -41.8% | -29.9% | +27.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | -50.9% | -41.8% | -35.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.4% | -50.9% | +94.4% | +32.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.5% | -16.5% | -11.2% | +8.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and EVTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYW's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs EVTC's 62.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.48x | 0.77x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.67 | $18.05 | $38.56 | $35.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.22 | $9.97 | $21.82 | $21.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +95.5% | +62.3% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 83.6 | 21.5 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 131K | 1.9M | 453K | 634K |
Analyst Outlook
EVTC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYH as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", RAMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.0% upside for SKYH (target: $15) vs 8.8% for FLYW (target: $19). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $18.75 | $34.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 19 | 18 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% | +4.7% | +5.3% |
EVTC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SKYH leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SKYH vs FLYW vs EVTC vs RAMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the stronger pick with 86.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 2% for EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus Flywire Corporation at 156. 6x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP?
Over the past 5 years, Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) delivered a total return of -1.
1%, compared to -50. 9% for Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +94. 4% versus FLYW's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Flywire Corporation's 1. 48β — meaning FLYW is approximately 92% more volatile than EVTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 158% for EVERTEC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is pulling ahead at 86.
6% versus 10. 2% for EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -107. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYH leads at 146. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP?
Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the more profitable company, earning 68.
3% net margin versus -0. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 68. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus 0. 7% for RAMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RAMP leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 35. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYH: 46. 0% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SKYH, FLYW, RAMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKYH or FLYW or EVTC or RAMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVTC: +94. 4%, FLYW: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYH and FLYW and EVTC and RAMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKYH (Industrials) and FLYW (Technology) and EVTC (Technology) and RAMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKYH is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; RAMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EVTC pays a dividend while SKYH, FLYW, RAMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.