Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYW vs UAL vs DAL vs MESA vs AAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
SKYW vs UAL vs DAL vs MESA vs AAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $3.52B | $32.37B | $47.75B | $879M | $8.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.12B | $60.47B | $63.36B | $381M | $55.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $429M | $3.67B | $5.01B | $-166M | $202M |
| Gross Margin | 41.9% | 64.2% | 24.5% | 10.8% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 8.4% | 9.2% | -44.6% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 10.8x | 13.6x | 30.9x | 77.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.39B | $31.04B | $21.08B | $103M | $35.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $5.94B | $4.31B | $42M | $1.69B |
SKYW vs UAL vs DAL vs MESA vs AAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) | 100 | 275.2 | +175.2% |
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 355.1 | +255.1% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 290.9 | +190.9% |
| Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA) | 100 | 646.2 | +546.2% |
| American Airlines G… (AAL) | 100 | 127.1 | +27.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYW vs UAL vs DAL vs MESA vs AAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth 33.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 282.0% 10Y total return vs UAL's 118.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 87.1%, current ratio 0.65x
- 15.0% revenue growth vs MESA's -19.9%
UAL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.93, yield 0.9%
- 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 6.2% ROA vs MESA's -71.1%, ROIC 12.0% vs -62.9%
MESA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.82 vs UAL's 2.25
- +20.3% vs SKYW's -9.6%
Among these 5 stocks, AAL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.0% revenue growth vs MESA's -19.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 77.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs MESA's -43.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs UAL's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs SKYW's -9.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs MESA's -71.1%, ROIC 12.0% vs -62.9% |
SKYW vs UAL vs DAL vs MESA vs AAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKYW vs UAL vs DAL vs MESA vs AAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SKYW leads in 2 of 6 categories
MESA leads 2 • DAL leads 1 • UAL leads 0 • AAL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.4B annually — 166.1x MESA's $381M. SKYW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MESA's -43.6%. On growth, AAL holds the edge at +10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $60.5B | $63.4B | $381M | $56.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $967M | $8.1B | $8.9B | -$150M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $429M | $3.7B | $5.0B | -$166M | $202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $339M | $3.2B | $3.8B | -$53M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +64.2% | +24.5% | +10.8% | +21.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +8.4% | +9.2% | -44.6% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +6.1% | +7.9% | -43.6% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +5.3% | +6.1% | -14.0% | +3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +10.6% | +2.9% | -21.3% | +10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +84.5% | +44.2% | +43.3% | +19.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SKYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, SKYW trades at a 89% valuation discount to AAL's 77.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SKYW's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAL's 12.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $32.4B | $47.8B | $879M | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $57.5B | $64.5B | $1.2B | $43.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.47x | 9.76x | 9.54x | -0.04x | 77.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.09x | 10.84x | 13.57x | 30.88x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.02x | 7.51x | 7.81x | — | 12.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 0.55x | 0.75x | 1.85x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 2.13x | 2.30x | 0.03x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.27x | 12.66x | 12.43x | 63.13x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SKYW and DAL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UAL delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MESA. SKYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UAL's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKYW scores 8/9 vs MESA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.0% | +24.9% | +24.1% | -5.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +4.7% | +6.2% | -71.1% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +9.1% | +12.0% | -62.9% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +9.3% | +11.4% | -86.2% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 2.03x | 1.02x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $25.1B | $16.8B | $61M | $34.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $5.9B | $4.3B | $42M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $31.0B | $21.1B | $103M | $36.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.88x | 4.61x | 9.69x | -8.18x | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MESA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MESA five years ago would be worth $18,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,991 for AAL. Over the past 12 months, MESA leads with a +2034.1% total return vs SKYW's -9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MESA at 118.6% vs AAL's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.4% | -11.8% | +6.1% | 0.0% | -14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.6% | +32.3% | +63.0% | +2034.1% | +24.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.4% | +117.4% | +118.3% | +944.8% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.9% | +82.2% | +61.9% | +88.3% | -40.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +282.0% | +118.1% | +87.4% | +78.7% | -55.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.4% | +29.5% | +29.7% | +118.6% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MESA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MESA is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAL's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MESA currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SKYW's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 2.25x | 1.90x | 0.88x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $123.94 | $119.21 | $76.39 | $21.00 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.00 | $71.55 | $44.78 | $0.90 | $10.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.7% | +83.6% | +95.7% | +100.0% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 58.4 | 64.2 | 98.1 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 379K | 8.3M | 12.2M | 0 | 68.2M |
Analyst Outlook
DAL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYW as "Buy", UAL as "Buy", DAL as "Buy", MESA as "Hold", AAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for SKYW (target: $122) vs 13.9% for DAL (target: $83). DAL is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $122.00 | $136.10 | $83.27 | — | $15.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 47 | 44 | 6 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.67 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SKYW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MESA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SKYW vs UAL vs DAL vs MESA vs AAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA). SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL?
On trailing P/E, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus American Airlines Group Inc. at 77. 5x. On forward P/E, SkyWest, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL?
Over the past 5 years, Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) delivered a total return of +88. 3%, compared to -40. 1% for American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKYW returned +284. 6% versus AAL's -54. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus United Airlines Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning UAL is approximately 155% more volatile than MESA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 2% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -19. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delta Air Lines, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to -86. 3% for American Airlines Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYW leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL?
SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -39. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYW leads at 15. 2% versus -46. 5% for MESA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MESA leads at 99. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Mesa Air Group, Inc. — 22. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYW: 39. 2% to $122. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL?
In this comparison, DAL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. SKYW, UAL, MESA, AAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKYW or UAL or DAL or MESA or AAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88)). American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MESA: +78. 7%, AAL: -54. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYW and UAL and DAL and MESA and AAL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MESA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DAL pays a dividend while SKYW, UAL, MESA, AAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.