SMMT vs KYMR vs RVMD vs ARVN vs KRYS

For growth investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (39. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Revolution Medicines, Inc.

(RVMD) delivered a total return of +382. 1%, compared to -84. 0% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +26. 9% versus ARVN's -36. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Revolution Medicines, Inc.

(RVMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Summit Therapeutics Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning SMMT is approximately 74% more volatile than RVMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for Revolution Medicines, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -364. 5% for Summit Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KYMR: 38.

3% to $117. 06.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Revolution Medicines, Inc.

(RVMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), +393. 1% 10Y return). Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RVMD: +393. 1%, SMMT: +91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SMMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RVMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.