Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNAP vs META vs PINS vs RDDT vs BMBL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
SNAP vs META vs PINS vs RDDT vs BMBL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $10.11B | $1.56T | $14.34B | $31.40B | $403M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.10B | $214.96B | $4.37B | $2.47B | $931M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-410M | $70.59B | $334M | $708M | $-661M |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 81.9% | 79.9% | 91.4% | 71.8% |
| Operating Margin | -6.8% | 41.2% | 6.3% | 25.1% | -15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.4x | 11.8x | 40.0x | 3.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.70B | $83.90B | $262M | $23M | $588M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.03B | $35.87B | $969M | $954M | $176M |
SNAP vs META vs PINS vs RDDT vs BMBL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | 100 | 52.1 | -47.9% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 127.0 | +27.0% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 62.2 | -37.8% |
| Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) | 100 | 332.4 | +232.4% |
| Bumble Inc. (BMBL) | 100 | 30.5 | -69.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNAP vs META vs PINS vs RDDT vs BMBL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SNAP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
META is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.59, yield 0.3%
- 421.2% 10Y total return vs RDDT's 225.0%
- 32.8% margin vs BMBL's -71.0%
- 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PINS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 5.5%, current ratio 7.64x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 7.64x
- Beta 1.27 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage
RDDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 69.4%, EPS growth 197.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 48.9%
- 69.4% revenue growth vs BMBL's -9.9%
- +55.3% vs SNAP's -26.4%
- 23.1% ROA vs BMBL's -36.5%, ROIC 18.4% vs 13.4%
BMBL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (3.5x vs 40.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.4% revenue growth vs BMBL's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 40.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.8% margin vs BMBL's -71.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.3% vs SNAP's -26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.1% ROA vs BMBL's -36.5%, ROIC 18.4% vs 13.4% |
SNAP vs META vs PINS vs RDDT vs BMBL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAP vs META vs PINS vs RDDT vs BMBL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RDDT leads in 3 of 6 categories
BMBL leads 1 • META leads 1 • SNAP leads 0 • PINS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.0B annually — 230.9x BMBL's $931M. META is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BMBL's -71.0%. On growth, RDDT holds the edge at +69.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $215.0B | $4.4B | $2.5B | $931M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$291M | $109.3B | $294M | $633M | -$125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$410M | $70.6B | $334M | $708M | -$661M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $609M | $48.3B | $1.2B | $869M | $272M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +81.9% | +79.9% | +91.4% | +71.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +41.2% | +6.3% | +25.1% | -15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +32.8% | +7.6% | +28.6% | -71.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +22.4% | +27.6% | +35.1% | +29.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | +33.1% | +17.8% | +69.1% | -14.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.2% | +62.4% | -10.3% | +6.2% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BMBL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.3x trailing earnings, META trades at a 58% valuation discount to RDDT's 62.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMBL's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RDDT's 66.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.1B | $1.56T | $14.3B | $31.4B | $403M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.8B | $1.61T | $13.6B | $30.5B | $816M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.17x | 26.26x | 35.37x | 62.57x | -0.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.36x | 11.84x | 40.02x | 3.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.43x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.81x | 39.51x | 66.53x | 2.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.70x | 7.78x | 3.40x | 14.26x | 0.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.51x | 7.31x | 3.13x | 11.31x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.12x | 33.90x | 11.46x | 45.89x | 1.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RDDT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
META delivers a 33.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-77 for BMBL. RDDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAP's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDDT scores 7/9 vs BMBL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.9% | +33.2% | +7.8% | +25.5% | -76.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +20.8% | +6.3% | +23.1% | -36.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.9% | +27.6% | +6.1% | +18.4% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.1% | +29.4% | +6.4% | +17.2% | +13.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.06x | 0.39x | 0.06x | 0.01x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $48.0B | -$707M | -$930M | $413M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $35.9B | $969M | $954M | $176M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.7B | $83.9B | $262M | $23M | $588M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.67x | 78.84x | 23.20x | — | -35.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RDDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDDT five years ago would be worth $32,502 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $597 for BMBL. Over the past 12 months, RDDT leads with a +55.3% total return vs SNAP's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RDDT at 48.1% vs BMBL's -41.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.4% | -5.1% | -18.8% | -32.2% | -4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.4% | +3.7% | -21.1% | +55.3% | -21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | +166.4% | -0.1% | +225.0% | -80.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | +94.8% | -64.0% | +225.0% | -94.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.6% | +421.2% | -11.6% | +225.0% | -95.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.8% | +38.6% | -0.0% | +48.1% | -41.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — META and PINS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PINS is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. META currently trades 77.5% from its 52-week high vs BMBL's 40.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 1.59x | 1.27x | 1.79x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.41 | $796.25 | $39.93 | $282.95 | $8.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.81 | $520.26 | $13.84 | $94.89 | $2.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.5% | +77.5% | +54.0% | +57.9% | +40.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 42.8 | 60.2 | 58.4 | 35.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49.1M | 15.6M | 16.1M | 4.5M | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
META leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNAP as "Hold", META as "Buy", PINS as "Buy", RDDT as "Buy", BMBL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 39.1% upside for RDDT (target: $228) vs 17.5% for PINS (target: $25). META is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.89 | $821.80 | $25.36 | $228.11 | $4.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 72 | 60 | 47 | 26 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.07 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +27.2% | +1.7% | +6.5% | 0.0% | +7.1% |
RDDT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BMBL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SNAP vs META vs PINS vs RDDT vs BMBL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) is the stronger pick with 69. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL?
On trailing P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the cheapest at 26. 3x versus Reddit, Inc. at 62. 6x. On forward P/E, Bumble Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL?
Over the past 5 years, Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) delivered a total return of +225. 0%, compared to -94. 0% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: META returned +421. 2% versus BMBL's -95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Snap Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning SNAP is approximately 69% more volatile than PINS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Snap Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) is pulling ahead at 69. 4% versus -9. 9% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reddit, Inc. grew EPS 197. 4% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDDT leads at 48. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL?
Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus -72. 7% for Bumble Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -9. 0% for SNAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RDDT leads at 91. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bumble Inc.
(BMBL) trades at 3. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Reddit, Inc. — 36. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RDDT: 39. 1% to $228. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL?
In this comparison, META (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SNAP, PINS, RDDT, BMBL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNAP or META or PINS or RDDT or BMBL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27)). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PINS: -11. 6%, SNAP: -75. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNAP and META and PINS and RDDT and BMBL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SNAP (Unknown) and META (Communication Services) and PINS (Communication Services) and RDDT (Communication Services) and BMBL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SNAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RDDT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BMBL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.