Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNFCA vs KINS vs PLMR vs LMND vs ROOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
SNFCA vs KINS vs PLMR vs LMND vs ROOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $251M | $234M | $3.01B | $4.18B | $798M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $344.59B | $199M | $874M | $821M | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $41M | $197M | $-139M | $56M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.7% | 56.2% | 47.6% | 17.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 25.6% | 29.0% | -16.3% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.9x | 7.0x | 11.9x | — | 29.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $4M | $7M | $182M | $201M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $12M | $107M | $385M | $690M |
SNFCA vs KINS vs PLMR vs LMND vs ROOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security National F… (SNFCA) | 100 | 182.7 | +82.7% |
| Kingstone Companies… (KINS) | 100 | 277.7 | +177.7% |
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 127.4 | +27.4% |
| Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) | 100 | 108.2 | +8.2% |
| Root, Inc. (ROOT) | 100 | 13.2 | -86.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNFCA vs KINS vs PLMR vs LMND vs ROOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNFCA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 42K% NII/revenue growth vs KINS's 28.4%
KINS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.06 vs PLMR's 0.12
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 29.0x)
- 0.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 9.8% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 46.6% vs -36.8%
PLMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.24
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 498.1% 10Y total return vs KINS's 101.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 0.8%
LMND is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +78.2% vs ROOT's -59.3%
ROOT is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.30, current ratio 2.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42K% NII/revenue growth vs KINS's 28.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 29.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.6% margin vs LMND's -16.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs LMND's 2.75, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.2% vs ROOT's -59.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.8% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 46.6% vs -36.8% |
SNFCA vs KINS vs PLMR vs LMND vs ROOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SNFCA vs KINS vs PLMR vs LMND vs ROOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
KINS leads 2 • SNFCA leads 0 • LMND leads 0 • ROOT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNFCA is the larger business by revenue, generating $344.6B annually — 1729.9x KINS's $199M. PLMR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +62.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $344.6B | $199M | $874M | $821M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | $54M | $265M | -$121M | $73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $41M | $197M | -$139M | $56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $73M | $406M | $20M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +57.7% | +56.2% | +47.6% | +17.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +25.6% | +29.0% | -16.3% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +20.5% | +22.6% | -16.9% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +36.7% | +46.4% | +2.4% | +11.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.2% | +62.8% | +55.0% | +12.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.7% | +157.5% | +59.7% | +45.3% | +95.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SNFCA and KINS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, KINS trades at a 78% valuation discount to ROOT's 25.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KINS offers better value at 0.06x vs PLMR's 0.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $251M | $234M | $3.0B | $4.2B | $798M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $251M | $226M | $2.9B | $4.0B | $309M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.86x | 5.61x | 15.84x | -23.67x | 25.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.03x | 11.87x | — | 29.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.06x | 0.16x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.22x | 11.10x | — | 5.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 1.17x | 3.44x | 5.67x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.86x | 3.31x | 7.33x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.01x | 3.20x | 7.36x | — | 4.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS delivers a 40.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. PLMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROOT's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KINS scores 7/9 vs SNFCA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +40.0% | +22.8% | -26.5% | +15.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +9.8% | +7.6% | -7.4% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +46.6% | +25.5% | -36.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +20.3% | +11.3% | -22.7% | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.01x | 0.34x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | -$8M | -$100M | -$203M | -$489M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $12M | $107M | $385M | $690M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4M | $7M | $182M | $201M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.24x | 115.65x | 649.06x | — | 1.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KINS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KINS five years ago would be worth $19,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,043 for ROOT. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +78.2% total return vs ROOT's -59.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KINS at 127.2% vs SNFCA's 11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | -0.3% | -13.8% | -28.3% | -19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.0% | -10.1% | -27.6% | +78.2% | -59.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.7% | +1073.4% | +124.0% | +234.7% | +927.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.9% | +99.4% | +68.0% | -31.2% | -69.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.4% | +101.9% | +498.1% | -21.6% | -88.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.5% | +127.2% | +30.8% | +49.6% | +117.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNFCA and PLMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNFCA currently trades 90.0% from its 52-week high vs ROOT's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.28x | 0.24x | 2.75x | 2.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $22.40 | $175.85 | $99.90 | $162.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.70 | $13.08 | $107.75 | $28.71 | $40.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +72.1% | +64.6% | +54.5% | +34.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 50.5 | 27.9 | 36.3 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 113K | 234K | 1.9M | 330K |
Analyst Outlook
PLMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KINS as "Buy", PLMR as "Buy", LMND as "Buy", ROOT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for LMND (target: $73) vs -2.9% for PLMR (target: $110). KINS is the only dividend payer here at 0.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $110.25 | $72.67 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 11 | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.10 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PLMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). KINS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SNFCA vs KINS vs PLMR vs LMND vs ROOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is the stronger pick with 42061% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 28.
4% for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT?
On trailing P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Root, Inc. at 25. 4x. On forward P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT?
Over the past 5 years, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to -69. 6% for Root, Inc. (ROOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLMR returned +498. 1% versus ROOT's -88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 24β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately 1042% more volatile than PLMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 51% for Root, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is pulling ahead at 42061% versus 28.
4% for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kingstone Companies, Inc. grew EPS 94. 6% year-over-year, compared to 18. 9% for Security National Financial Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT?
Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLMR leads at 28. 9% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLMR leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 0x for Root, Inc. — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMND: 33. 5% to $72. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT?
In this comparison, KINS (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. SNFCA, PLMR, LMND, ROOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNFCA or KINS or PLMR or LMND or ROOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 0. 6% yield, +101. 9% 10Y return). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KINS: +101. 9%, ROOT: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNFCA and KINS and PLMR and LMND and ROOT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KINS pays a dividend while SNFCA, PLMR, LMND, ROOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.