Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SO vs EXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
SO vs EXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $104.20B | $45.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.17B | $24.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.36B | $2.78B |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | 24.1% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $65.82B | $50.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.64B | $1.15B |
SO vs EXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 162.0 | +62.0% |
| Exelon Corporation (EXC) | 100 | 162.6 | +62.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SO vs EXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth -1.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.3%
- 137.8% 10Y total return vs EXC's 125.0%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.15, current ratio 0.65x
EXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.14, yield 3.6%
- PEG 2.44 vs SO's 3.45
- Beta -0.14, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.92x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 20.2x), PEG 2.44 vs 3.45 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.5% margin vs EXC's 11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (169.3% vs 175.5%) | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SO's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.6% vs EXC's -0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs EXC's 2.4%, ROIC 5.3% vs 5.1% |
SO vs EXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SO vs EXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SO and EXC operate at a comparable scale, with $30.2B and $24.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.5% (SO) to 11.2% (EXC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30.2B | $24.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13.3B | $8.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.4B | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3.8B | -$2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.1% | +29.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | -8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.8% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EXC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, EXC trades at a 31% valuation discount to SO's 23.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EXC offers better value at 2.54x vs SO's 4.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104.2B | $45.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $168.4B | $94.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.58x | 16.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.21x | 15.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.03x | 2.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.66x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.53x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.64x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SO delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for EXC. SO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXC's 1.76x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $64.2B | $49.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65.8B | $50.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.51x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXC five years ago would be worth $16,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,062 for SO. Over the past 12 months, SO leads with a +3.6% total return vs EXC's -0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SO at 10.7% vs EXC's 4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.9% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.6% | -0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +14.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.6% | +61.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.8% | +125.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXC's -0.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SO currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs EXC's 87.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.15x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.84 | $50.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $83.09 | $41.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 33.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
EXC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SO as "Hold" and EXC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for EXC (target: $49) vs 7.8% for SO (target: $100). For income investors, EXC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs SO's 2.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.62 | $49.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.72 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
SO vs EXC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SO or EXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger pick with 10.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Southern Company (SO) a "Hold" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SO or EXC?
On trailing P/E, Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the cheapest at 16.
2x versus The Southern Company at 23. 6x. On forward P/E, Exelon Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Exelon Corporation wins at 2. 44x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SO or EXC?
Over the past 5 years, Exelon Corporation (EXC) delivered a total return of +61.
8%, compared to +60. 6% for The Southern Company (SO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SO returned +137. 8% versus EXC's +125. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SO or EXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Exelon Corporation's -0. 14β — meaning EXC is approximately -7% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Southern Company (SO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 169% versus 176% for Exelon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SO or EXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Southern Company (SO) is pulling ahead at 10.
6% versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exelon Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXC leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SO or EXC?
The Southern Company (SO) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
7% net margin versus 11. 4% for Exelon Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SO leads at 24. 6% versus 21. 2% for EXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SO leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SO or EXC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 44x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Exelon Corporation (EXC) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for The Southern Company — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXC: 10. 7% to $49. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — SO or EXC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 9% for The Southern Company (SO).
09Is SO or EXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 9% yield, +137. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +137. 8%, EXC: +125. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SO and EXC?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.