Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SOPA vs BABA vs SE vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
SOPA vs BABA vs SE vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2M | $338.19B | $52.45B | $143.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $1.01T | $21.04B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $123.35B | $1.43B | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 41.2% | 44.9% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -143.4% | 10.9% | 8.2% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.2x | 24.5x | 60.1x |
| Total Debt | $866K | $248.49B | $4.12B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $181.73B | $2.41B | $1.53B |
SOPA vs BABA vs SE vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Society Pass Incorp… (SOPA) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 109.8 | +9.8% |
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 72.6 | -27.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOPA vs BABA vs SE vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOPA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 1.23, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.54x
- Lower P/E (4.2x vs 60.1x)
SE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 192.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
SHOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 40.8% 10Y total return vs SE's 443.6%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0%
- +17.6% vs SOPA's -70.2%
- 9.0% ROA vs SOPA's -16.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 60.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SOPA's -77.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs SHOP's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.6% vs SOPA's -70.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs SOPA's -16.8% |
SOPA vs BABA vs SE vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SOPA vs BABA vs SE vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SE leads in 1 of 6 categories
SHOP leads 1 • BABA leads 1 • SOPA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 140029.8x SOPA's $7M. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOPA's -77.4%. On growth, SE holds the edge at +38.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $1.01T | $21.0B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $114.6B | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $123.4B | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $2.6B | $3.9B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +41.2% | +44.9% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.4% | +10.9% | +8.2% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.4% | +12.2% | +6.8% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +0.3% | +18.5% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.6% | +4.8% | +38.3% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.4% | -52.0% | +126.9% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SOPA and BABA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.8x trailing earnings, BABA trades at a 85% valuation discount to SE's 118.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BABA's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHOP's 94.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $338.2B | $52.4B | $143.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $348.0B | $54.2B | $142.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | 17.78x | 118.81x | 117.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.16x | 24.52x | 60.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.46x | 51.50x | 94.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 2.31x | 3.12x | 12.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.11x | 6.19x | 10.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.95x | 29.44x | 17.74x | 71.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHOP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SE delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-41 for SOPA. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SE's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs SOPA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.8% | +11.2% | +15.2% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | +6.7% | +5.8% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.6% | +5.4% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +10.4% | +6.0% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.23x | 0.49x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $66.8B | $1.7B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $181.7B | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $866,416 | $248.5B | $4.1B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -92.89x | 15.74x | 49.70x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BABA and SHOP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHOP five years ago would be worth $10,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SOPA. Over the past 12 months, SHOP leads with a +17.6% total return vs SOPA's -70.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.2% vs SOPA's -70.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -89.4% | -10.1% | -34.0% | -29.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -70.2% | +12.9% | -40.5% | +17.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +73.7% | +2.8% | +71.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -34.1% | -61.0% | +2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +82.2% | +443.6% | +4076.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.6% | +20.2% | +0.9% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
BABA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BABA is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 72.7% from its 52-week high vs SOPA's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.23x | 1.46x | 2.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.28 | $192.67 | $199.30 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $103.71 | $77.05 | $88.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.0% | +72.7% | +43.5% | +60.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.8 | 60.9 | 54.0 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 10.4M | 4.8M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BABA as "Buy", SE as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 70.3% upside for SE (target: $148) vs 38.7% for BABA (target: $194). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.23 | $147.67 | $156.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 | 44 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.14 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SHOP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SOPA vs BABA vs SE vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (4. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the cheapest at 17.
8x versus Sea Limited at 118. 8x. On forward P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) delivered a total return of +2. 3%, compared to -99. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +40. 8% versus SOPA's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
23β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning SHOP is approximately 102% more volatile than BABA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for Sea Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 192. 0% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOPA leads at 139. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus -143. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14. 1% versus -131. 2% for SOPA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHOP leads at 48. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) trades at 4.
2x forward P/E versus 60. 1x for Shopify Inc. — 56. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SE: 70. 3% to $147. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SOPA, SE, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOPA or BABA or SE or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
23), 1. 3% yield). Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +82. 2%, SOPA: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOPA and BABA and SE and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOPA (Technology) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and SE (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOPA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BABA pays a dividend while SOPA, SE, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.