Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Security & Protection Services
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Business Services
SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Security & Protection Services | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $10M | $4.44B | $31M | $11.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $72M | $5.39B | $299M | $18.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-24M | $180M | $13M | $317M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 15.1% | 26.1% | -26.9% | 7.0% |
| Operating Margin | -143.4% | -27.4% | 10.7% | 11.3% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 11.7x | — | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $866K | $3M | $4.93B | $79M | $5.72B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $22M | $2.27B | $22M | $639M |
SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Society Pass Incorp… (SOPA) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| The Brink's Company (BCO) | 100 | 176.2 | +76.2% |
| Katapult Holdings, … (KPLT) | 100 | 7.1 | -92.9% |
| Aramark (ARMK) | 100 | 186.9 | +86.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOPA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.9%
- 293.0% 10Y total return vs ARMK's 97.1%
- Beta 1.10, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.51x
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 20.3x)
KPLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth 98.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 18.0% revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0%
- 4.3% margin vs SOPA's -77.4%
- Beta 0.04 vs GFAI's 2.31
ARMK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 0.99x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 20.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs SOPA's -77.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs GFAI's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ARMK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs SOPA's -67.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 39.6% vs -41.6% |
SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KPLT leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCO leads 2 • ARMK leads 1 • SOPA leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.8B annually — 2599.2x SOPA's $7M. KPLT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOPA's -77.4%. On growth, BCO holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $72M | $5.4B | $299M | $18.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$12M | $797M | $159M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$24M | $180M | $13M | $317M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$6M | $544M | -$4M | $257M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +15.1% | +26.1% | -26.9% | +7.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.4% | -27.4% | +10.7% | +11.3% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.4% | -32.9% | +3.3% | +4.3% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -8.8% | +10.1% | -1.2% | +1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.6% | +3.6% | +10.3% | +9.8% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.4% | +38.9% | -35.3% | +105.7% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, BCO trades at a 38% valuation discount to ARMK's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KPLT's 0.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARMK's 13.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $10M | $4.4B | $31M | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | -$9M | $7.1B | $87M | $16.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | -0.89x | 22.93x | -63.00x | 36.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.73x | — | 20.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.01x | 0.45x | 13.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.28x | 0.84x | 0.10x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.16x | 11.14x | — | 3.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.94x | — | 10.17x | — | 26.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO delivers a 45.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCO's 12.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARMK scores 7/9 vs SOPA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.8% | -69.7% | +45.6% | — | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | -50.2% | +2.5% | +13.1% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -41.6% | +14.3% | +39.6% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | -19.1% | +12.1% | — | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 12.10x | — | 1.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$19M | $2.7B | $57M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $22M | $2.3B | $22M | $639M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $866,416 | $3M | $4.9B | $79M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -92.89x | -167.24x | 3.90x | 1.85x | 2.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARMK five years ago would be worth $17,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SOPA. Over the past 12 months, BCO leads with a +19.4% total return vs SOPA's -67.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARMK at 23.3% vs SOPA's -70.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -89.4% | -26.3% | -7.3% | +7.1% | +23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.1% | -53.2% | +19.4% | -1.0% | +19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -93.8% | +75.3% | -56.0% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.5% | +39.3% | -97.7% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.5% | +293.0% | -97.2% | +97.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.6% | -60.4% | +20.6% | -23.9% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KPLT and ARMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KPLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARMK currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs SOPA's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.19x | 2.31x | 1.10x | 0.04x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.28 | $1.50 | $136.37 | $24.34 | $46.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $0.38 | $80.10 | $5.50 | $35.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.0% | +31.5% | +79.0% | +28.5% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 47.0 | 52.0 | 48.1 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 378K | 543K | 20K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCO as "Buy", ARMK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.3% upside for BCO (target: $163) vs 4.7% for ARMK (target: $47). For income investors, BCO offers the higher dividend yield at 0.93% vs ARMK's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $163.00 | — | $47.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 6 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.7% | +1.9% | +1.2% |
KPLT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BCO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Katapult Holdings, Inc.
(KPLT) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). The Brink's Company (BCO) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Brink's Company (BCO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?
On trailing P/E, The Brink's Company (BCO) is the cheapest at 22.
9x versus Aramark at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, The Brink's Company is actually cheaper at 11. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?
Over the past 5 years, Aramark (ARMK) delivered a total return of +70.
5%, compared to -99. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCO returned +293. 0% versus SOPA's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Katapult Holdings, Inc.
(KPLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately 6196% more volatile than KPLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 12% for The Brink's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Katapult Holdings, Inc.
(KPLT) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Katapult Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 98. 2% year-over-year, compared to 23. 2% for Aramark. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOPA leads at 139. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?
The Brink's Company (BCO) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
8% net margin versus -143. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCO leads at 11. 3% versus -131. 2% for SOPA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOPA leads at 26. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Brink's Company (BCO) trades at 11.
7x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Aramark — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCO: 51. 3% to $163. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?
In this comparison, BCO (0.
9% yield), ARMK (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SOPA, GFAI, KPLT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aramark (ARMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 9% yield). Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARMK: +97. 1%, SOPA: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOPA and GFAI and BCO and KPLT and ARMK?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOPA (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and BCO (Industrials) and KPLT (Technology) and ARMK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOPA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KPLT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARMK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BCO, ARMK pay a dividend while SOPA, GFAI, KPLT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.