Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SOPA
Society Pass Incorporated

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.7%
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited

Security & Protection Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-99.3%
BCO
The Brink's Company

Security & Protection Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.44B
5Y Perf.+76.2%
KPLT
Katapult Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31M
5Y Perf.-92.9%
ARMK
Aramark

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.84B
5Y Perf.+86.9%

SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SOPA logoSOPA
GFAI logoGFAI
BCO logoBCO
KPLT logoKPLT
ARMK logoARMK
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSecurity & Protection ServicesSecurity & Protection ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureSpecialty Business Services
Market Cap$2M$10M$4.44B$31M$11.84B
Revenue (TTM)$7M$72M$5.39B$299M$18.79B
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$-24M$180M$13M$317M
Gross Margin45.7%15.1%26.1%-26.9%7.0%
Operating Margin-143.4%-27.4%10.7%11.3%4.2%
Forward P/E11.7x20.3x
Total Debt$866K$3M$4.93B$79M$5.72B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$22M$2.27B$22M$639M

SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SOPA
GFAI
BCO
KPLT
ARMK
StockNov 21May 26Return
Society Pass Incorp… (SOPA)1000.3-99.7%
Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI)1000.7-99.3%
The Brink's Company (BCO)100176.2+76.2%
Katapult Holdings, … (KPLT)1007.1-92.9%
Aramark (ARMK)100186.9+86.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KPLT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. The Brink's Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SOPA
Society Pass Incorporated
The Technology Pick

SOPA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: technology exposure
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
The Industrials Pick

GFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
BCO
The Brink's Company
The Income Pick

BCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.9%
  • 293.0% 10Y total return vs ARMK's 97.1%
  • Beta 1.10, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.51x
  • Lower P/E (11.7x vs 20.3x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KPLT
Katapult Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

KPLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth 98.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
  • 18.0% revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0%
  • 4.3% margin vs SOPA's -77.4%
  • Beta 0.04 vs GFAI's 2.31
Best for: growth exposure
ARMK
Aramark
The Defensive Pick

ARMK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 0.99x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKPLT logoKPLT18.0% revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0%
ValueBCO logoBCOLower P/E (11.7x vs 20.3x)
Quality / MarginsKPLT logoKPLT4.3% margin vs SOPA's -77.4%
Stability / SafetyKPLT logoKPLTBeta 0.04 vs GFAI's 2.31
DividendsBCO logoBCO0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ARMK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BCO logoBCO+19.4% vs SOPA's -67.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KPLT logoKPLT13.1% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 39.6% vs -41.6%

SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SOPASociety Pass Incorporated
FY 2022
Digital Marketing
99.1%$3M
Software Development
0.9%$23,801
Hardware Sales
0.0%$150
GFAIGuardforce AI Co., Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

BCOThe Brink's Company
FY 2023
NorthAmericaSegment
39.3%$1.6B
LatinAmericaSegment
32.7%$1.3B
EuropeSegment
27.9%$1.1B
KPLTKatapult Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARMKAramark
FY 2024
Food and Support Services - United States
72.3%$12.6B
Food and Support Services - International
27.7%$4.8B

SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBCOLAGGINGGFAI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.8B annually — 2599.2x SOPA's $7M. KPLT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOPA's -77.4%. On growth, BCO holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSOPA logoSOPASociety Pass Inco…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…BCO logoBCOThe Brink's Compa…KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…ARMK logoARMKAramark
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7M$72M$5.4B$299M$18.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M-$12M$797M$159M$1.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M-$24M$180M$13M$317M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M-$6M$544M-$4M$257M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.7%+15.1%+26.1%-26.9%+7.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-143.4%-27.4%+10.7%+11.3%+4.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-77.4%-32.9%+3.3%+4.3%+1.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.6%-8.8%+10.1%-1.2%+1.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-17.6%+3.6%+10.3%+9.8%+6.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-85.4%+38.9%-35.3%+105.7%-7.7%
KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 22.9x trailing earnings, BCO trades at a 38% valuation discount to ARMK's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KPLT's 0.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARMK's 13.3x.

MetricSOPA logoSOPASociety Pass Inco…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…BCO logoBCOThe Brink's Compa…KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…ARMK logoARMKAramark
Market CapShares × price$2M$10M$4.4B$31M$11.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$4M-$9M$7.1B$87M$16.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.11x-0.89x22.93x-63.00x36.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.73x20.26x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.01x0.45x13.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.32x0.28x0.84x0.10x0.64x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.16x11.14x3.81x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.94x10.17x26.06x
KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BCO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

BCO delivers a 45.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCO's 12.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARMK scores 7/9 vs SOPA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSOPA logoSOPASociety Pass Inco…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…BCO logoBCOThe Brink's Compa…KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…ARMK logoARMKAramark
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-40.8%-69.7%+45.6%+9.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-16.8%-50.2%+2.5%+13.1%+2.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-41.6%+14.3%+39.6%+7.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.7%-19.1%+12.1%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x12.10x1.81x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M-$19M$2.7B$57M$5.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$22M$2.3B$22M$639M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$866,416$3M$4.9B$79M$5.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-92.89x-167.24x3.90x1.85x2.20x
BCO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARMK five years ago would be worth $17,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SOPA. Over the past 12 months, BCO leads with a +19.4% total return vs SOPA's -67.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARMK at 23.3% vs SOPA's -70.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSOPA logoSOPASociety Pass Inco…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…BCO logoBCOThe Brink's Compa…KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…ARMK logoARMKAramark
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-89.4%-26.3%-7.3%+7.1%+23.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-67.1%-53.2%+19.4%-1.0%+19.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.5%-93.8%+75.3%-56.0%+87.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-99.5%+39.3%-97.7%+70.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-99.5%+293.0%-97.2%+97.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-70.6%-60.4%+20.6%-23.9%+23.3%
ARMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KPLT and ARMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KPLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARMK currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs SOPA's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSOPA logoSOPASociety Pass Inco…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…BCO logoBCOThe Brink's Compa…KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…ARMK logoARMKAramark
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.19x2.31x1.10x0.04x0.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.28$1.50$136.37$24.34$46.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.32$0.38$80.10$5.50$35.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.0%+31.5%+79.0%+28.5%+96.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.647.052.048.162.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M378K543K20K2.2M
Evenly matched — KPLT and ARMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BCO as "Buy", ARMK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.3% upside for BCO (target: $163) vs 4.7% for ARMK (target: $47). For income investors, BCO offers the higher dividend yield at 0.93% vs ARMK's 0.92%.

MetricSOPA logoSOPASociety Pass Inco…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…BCO logoBCOThe Brink's Compa…KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…ARMK logoARMKAramark
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$163.00$47.20
# AnalystsCovering analysts924
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises61
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.00$0.41
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.7%+1.9%+1.2%
BCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KPLT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BCO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Brink's Company (BCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SOPA vs GFAI vs BCO vs KPLT vs ARMK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Katapult Holdings, Inc.

(KPLT) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). The Brink's Company (BCO) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Brink's Company (BCO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?

On trailing P/E, The Brink's Company (BCO) is the cheapest at 22.

9x versus Aramark at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, The Brink's Company is actually cheaper at 11. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?

Over the past 5 years, Aramark (ARMK) delivered a total return of +70.

5%, compared to -99. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCO returned +293. 0% versus SOPA's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Katapult Holdings, Inc.

(KPLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately 6196% more volatile than KPLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 12% for The Brink's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Katapult Holdings, Inc.

(KPLT) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Katapult Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 98. 2% year-over-year, compared to 23. 2% for Aramark. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOPA leads at 139. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?

The Brink's Company (BCO) is the more profitable company, earning 3.

8% net margin versus -143. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCO leads at 11. 3% versus -131. 2% for SOPA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOPA leads at 26. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, The Brink's Company (BCO) trades at 11.

7x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Aramark — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCO: 51. 3% to $163. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK?

In this comparison, BCO (0.

9% yield), ARMK (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SOPA, GFAI, KPLT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SOPA or GFAI or BCO or KPLT or ARMK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aramark (ARMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

71), 0. 9% yield). Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARMK: +97. 1%, SOPA: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SOPA and GFAI and BCO and KPLT and ARMK?

These companies operate in different sectors (SOPA (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and BCO (Industrials) and KPLT (Technology) and ARMK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SOPA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KPLT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARMK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BCO, ARMK pay a dividend while SOPA, GFAI, KPLT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SOPA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GFAI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BCO

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KPLT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARMK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SOPA and GFAI and BCO and KPLT and ARMK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SOPA: -17.6% · GFAI: 3.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.