Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SOPA vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
SOPA vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $1.74B | $2.12B | $4.80B | $616.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $1.07B | $188.60B | $1.73B | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $72M | $12.54B | $106M | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 61.9% | 0.2% | 43.6% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | -143.4% | 11.7% | 5.7% | 6.9% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.3x | 41.5x | 39.7x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $866K | $72M | $0.00 | $220M | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $416M | $330M | $542M | $20.15B |
SOPA vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Society Pass Incorp… (SOPA) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 66.6 | -33.4% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 42.4 | -57.6% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 164.5 | +64.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOPA vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SOPA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PAYO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (20.3x vs 24.3x)
FLYW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +62.7% vs SOPA's -67.1%
RELY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 3.30x
- 29.4% revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0%
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- 329.1% 10Y total return vs PAYO's -47.7%
- 50.1% margin vs SOPA's -77.4%
- Beta 0.68 vs SOPA's 2.19
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.3x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs SOPA's -77.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs SOPA's 2.19 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs SOPA's -67.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs SOPA's -16.8% |
SOPA vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SOPA vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 3 of 6 categories
SOPA leads 0 • PAYO leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • RELY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 26095.3x SOPA's $7M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOPA's -77.4%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $1.1B | $188.6B | $1.7B | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $208M | $10.8B | $149M | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $72M | $12.5B | $106M | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $215M | -$15.8B | $256M | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +61.9% | +0.2% | +43.6% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.4% | +11.7% | +5.7% | +6.9% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.4% | +6.8% | +6.6% | +6.1% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +20.2% | -8.4% | +14.8% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.6% | +6.1% | +1408.6% | +25.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.4% | +20.0% | +4.0% | +3.6% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SOPA and PAYO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, PAYO trades at a 83% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PAYO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $1.7B | $2.1B | $4.8B | $616.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $1.4B | $1.8B | $4.5B | $621.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | 26.63x | 161.18x | 73.52x | 31.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.27x | 41.52x | 39.71x | 24.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.36x | 47.80x | 41.98x | 24.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 1.66x | 3.40x | 2.94x | 15.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.71x | 2.71x | 5.71x | 16.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.94x | 8.44x | 21.41x | 16.24x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-41 for SOPA. PAYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to V's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs SOPA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.8% | +10.0% | +5.9% | +12.7% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | +0.9% | +4.3% | +8.1% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +30.7% | +2.1% | +14.2% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +14.9% | +1.3% | +9.4% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | — | 0.25x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$343M | -$330M | -$322M | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $416M | $330M | $542M | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $866,416 | $72M | $0 | $220M | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -92.89x | 17.23x | 1.84x | 16.25x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SOPA. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs SOPA's -67.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors V at 12.2% vs SOPA's -70.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -89.4% | -7.0% | +27.6% | +72.4% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.1% | -17.9% | +62.7% | +8.1% | -7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -9.0% | -40.1% | +25.4% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -49.8% | -49.5% | -53.0% | +42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -47.7% | -49.5% | -53.0% | +329.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.6% | -3.1% | -15.7% | +7.8% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOPA's 2.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs SOPA's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.64x | 1.48x | 1.13x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.28 | $7.67 | $18.05 | $24.71 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $4.08 | $9.79 | $12.08 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.0% | +66.0% | +98.2% | +92.2% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 45.1 | 83.0 | 85.3 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 3.5M | 1.9M | 3.4M | 6.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAYO as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", RELY as "Buy", V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.1% upside for PAYO (target: $8) vs 3.1% for RELY (target: $24). V is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $18.75 | $23.50 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 19 | 13 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.0% | +3.7% | +1.1% | +2.2% |
V leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SOPA vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs V: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V?
On trailing P/E, Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Payoneer Global Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +42. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: V returned +325. 9% versus SOPA's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Society Pass Incorporated's 2. 13β — meaning SOPA is approximately 231% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 66% for Visa Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOPA leads at 139. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus -143. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus -131. 2% for SOPA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 21. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAYO: 58. 1% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V?
In this comparison, V (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. SOPA, PAYO, FLYW, RELY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOPA or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 0. 7% yield, +325. 9% 10Y return). Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +325. 9%, SOPA: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOPA and PAYO and FLYW and RELY and V?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOPA (Technology) and PAYO (Technology) and FLYW (Technology) and RELY (Technology) and V (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOPA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. V pays a dividend while SOPA, PAYO, FLYW, RELY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.