Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SPCE vs TSLA vs GM vs RKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Financial - Mortgages
SPCE vs TSLA vs GM vs RKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $158M | $1.55T | $70.70B | $39.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $97.88B | $184.62B | $6.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-293M | $3.88B | $2.54B | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | -46.5% | 19.1% | 6.1% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -183.1% | 5.0% | 1.3% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 213.0x | 6.2x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $420M | $8.38B | $130.28B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $179M | $16.51B | $20.95B | $2.70B |
SPCE vs TSLA vs GM vs RKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virgin Galactic Hol… (SPCE) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 247.9 | +147.9% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 264.6 | +164.6% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPCE vs TSLA vs GM vs RKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPCE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 53.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.8%
TSLA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 28.6% 10Y total return vs GM's 180.2%
- 4.0% margin vs SPCE's -176.2%
- 2.9% ROA vs SPCE's -34.3%, ROIC 4.5% vs -42.0%
GM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, current ratio 1.17x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 19.3x)
- Beta 1.07 vs TSLA's 2.06
RKT is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.77, current ratio 16.62x
- 27.4% NII/revenue growth vs TSLA's -2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% NII/revenue growth vs TSLA's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs SPCE's -176.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs TSLA's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.8% vs SPCE's -12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs SPCE's -34.3%, ROIC 4.5% vs -42.0% |
SPCE vs TSLA vs GM vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPCE vs TSLA vs GM vs RKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories
GM leads 3 • SPCE leads 0 • RKT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GM is the larger business by revenue, generating $184.6B annually — 111151.7x SPCE's $2M. TSLA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPCE's -176.2%. On growth, TSLA holds the edge at +15.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $97.9B | $184.6B | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$287M | $9.5B | $15.5B | $639M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$293M | $3.9B | $2.5B | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$460M | $7.0B | $12.5B | -$4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -46.5% | +19.1% | +6.1% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -183.1% | +5.0% | +1.3% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -176.2% | +4.0% | +1.4% | -1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -277.1% | +7.2% | +6.8% | -58.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.2% | +15.8% | -0.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.0% | +11.9% | -15.2% | -89.6% |
Valuation Metrics
GM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.0x trailing earnings, GM trades at a 94% valuation discount to TSLA's 381.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GM's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSLA's 146.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $158M | $1.55T | $70.7B | $39.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $400M | $1.54T | $180.0B | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.18x | 381.31x | 23.98x | -282.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 212.96x | 6.22x | 19.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.84x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 146.35x | 10.29x | 41.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.49x | 16.30x | 0.38x | 5.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 17.53x | 1.21x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 248.44x | 6.38x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SPCE. TSLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GM's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -129.5% | +4.8% | +3.8% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.3% | +2.9% | +0.9% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.0% | +4.5% | +1.3% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.7% | +4.4% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | 0.10x | 2.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $242M | -$8.1B | $109.3B | -$2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $179M | $16.5B | $20.9B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $420M | $8.4B | $130.3B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.56x | 17.04x | 2.60x | 0.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $18,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $64 for SPCE. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +73.8% total return vs SPCE's -12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 33.8% vs SPCE's -68.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.9% | -6.0% | -3.0% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.1% | +49.1% | +73.8% | +21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | +139.7% | +137.4% | +77.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +83.7% | +35.9% | -11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +2856.3% | +180.2% | -20.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.7% | +33.8% | +33.4% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
GM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GM is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSLA's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs SPCE's 37.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 2.06x | 1.07x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.64 | $498.83 | $87.62 | $24.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.13 | $271.00 | $44.97 | $11.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.7% | +82.6% | +89.5% | +58.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 59.3 | 55.4 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.1M | 61.6M | 6.7M | 25.0M |
Analyst Outlook
GM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPCE as "Hold", TSLA as "Hold", GM as "Buy", RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for RKT (target: $22) vs 5.8% for SPCE (target: $3). GM is the only dividend payer here at 0.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.65 | $450.45 | $91.75 | $21.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 81 | 51 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.68 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.5% | 0.0% |
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GM leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
SPCE vs TSLA vs GM vs RKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Motors Company (GM) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT?
On trailing P/E, General Motors Company (GM) is the cheapest at 24.
0x versus Tesla, Inc. at 381. 3x. On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) delivered a total return of +83. 7%, compared to -99. 4% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +28. 6% versus SPCE's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Motors Company (GM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
07β versus Tesla, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning TSLA is approximately 92% more volatile than GM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 2% for General Motors Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus -2. 9% for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 53. 4% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPCE leads at 28. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT?
Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -49. 3% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 8. 7% versus -53. 5% for SPCE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.
2x forward P/E versus 213. 0x for Tesla, Inc. — 206. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RKT: 53. 1% to $21. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT?
In this comparison, GM (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. SPCE, TSLA, RKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPCE or TSLA or GM or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 0. 9% yield, +180. 2% 10Y return). Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +180. 2%, SPCE: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPCE and TSLA and GM and RKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPCE (Industrials) and TSLA (Consumer Cyclical) and GM (Consumer Cyclical) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TSLA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. GM pays a dividend while SPCE, TSLA, RKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.