REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SPG vs KIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
SPG vs KIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $66.84B | $16.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.36B | $2.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.61B | $616M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 49.9% | 36.1% |
| Forward P/E | 30.9x | 30.8x |
| Total Debt | $29.94B | $8.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $823M | $213M |
SPG vs KIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 356.2 | +256.2% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPG vs KIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.61
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 94.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 32.3% 10Y total return vs KIM's 12.3%
KIM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 81.8%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.54, yield 4.5%, current ratio 1.08x
- Lower P/E (30.8x vs 30.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% FFO/revenue growth vs KIM's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.8x vs 30.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs KIM's 28.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs SPG's 0.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.7% vs KIM's +20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs KIM's 3.1%, ROIC 7.6% vs 3.0% |
SPG vs KIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPG vs KIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 2.9x KIM's $2.2B. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIM's 28.5%. On growth, SPG holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.7B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.6B | $616M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.3B | $844M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.7% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +49.9% | +36.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +28.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +39.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +27.8% |
Valuation Metrics
KIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SPG trades at a 49% valuation discount to KIM's 28.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KIM's 17.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPG's 20.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66.8B | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96.0B | $24.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.53x | 28.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.90x | 30.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.60x | 17.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.50x | 7.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.99x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $6 for KIM. KIM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +68.8% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.47x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.1B | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $823M | $213M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.9B | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.26x | 2.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPG five years ago would be worth $19,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,567 for KIM. Over the past 12 months, SPG leads with a +33.7% total return vs KIM's +20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPG at 28.7% vs KIM's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +19.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.7% | +20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.0% | +45.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.9% | +35.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.3% | +12.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.7% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPG and KIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KIM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPG's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $208.28 | $24.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $155.44 | $19.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 5.0M |
Analyst Outlook
SPG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SPG as "Hold" and KIM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.9% upside for KIM (target: $24) vs -4.1% for SPG (target: $197). KIM is the only dividend payer here at 4.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $197.00 | $24.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
SPG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SPG vs KIM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPG or KIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) a "Hold" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPG or KIM?
On trailing P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Kimco Realty Corporation at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPG or KIM?
Over the past 5 years, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) delivered a total return of +97. 9%, compared to +35. 7% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPG returned +32. 3% versus KIM's +12. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPG or KIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Simon Property Group, Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning SPG is approximately 12% more volatile than KIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPG or KIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus 5. 1% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Simon Property Group, Inc. grew EPS 94. 8% year-over-year, compared to 50. 9% for Kimco Realty Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIM leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPG or KIM?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus 27. 3% for Kimco Realty Corporation — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPG leads at 49. 9% versus 35. 2% for KIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPG leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPG or KIM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.
8x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Simon Property Group, Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KIM: 1. 9% to $24. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPG or KIM?
In this comparison, KIM (4.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SPG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPG or KIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KIM: +12. 3%, SPG: +32. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPG and KIM?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. KIM pays a dividend while SPG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.