Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPSC vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY vs PAYC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
SPSC vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY vs PAYC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2.14B | $1.87B | $2.11B | $5.93B | $7.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $762M | $472M | $586M | $1.73B | $2.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $91M | $-50M | $-22M | $258M | $470M |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | 57.4% | 60.1% | 69.3% | 81.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | -9.3% | -0.8% | 21.3% | 28.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 21.7x | 19.6x | 14.0x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $354M | $237M | $218M | $152M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $151M | $63M | $121M | $398M | $370M |
SPSC vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY vs PAYC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
| Paycom Software, In… (PAYC) | 100 | 36.0 | -64.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPSC vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY vs PAYC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth 20.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 14.0x)
ALKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 32.9% revenue growth vs PAYC's 8.9%
NCNO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -22.1% vs SPSC's -59.7%
PCTY is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 218.2% 10Y total return vs PAYC's 271.8%
- Beta 0.43, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 0.43 vs ALKT's 1.30, lower leverage
PAYC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 1.1%
- PEG 0.49 vs SPSC's 0.89
- 22.4% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
- 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs PAYC's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 14.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.4% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs ALKT's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.1% vs SPSC's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 30.7% vs -8.6% |
SPSC vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY vs PAYC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPSC vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY vs PAYC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYC leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPSC leads 1 • ALKT leads 0 • NCNO leads 0 • PCTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 4.4x ALKT's $472M. PAYC is the more profitable business, keeping 22.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $762M | $472M | $586M | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $162M | -$12M | $27M | $394M | $780M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $91M | -$50M | -$22M | $258M | $470M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $167M | $44M | $60M | $470M | $444M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.0% | +57.4% | +60.1% | +69.3% | +81.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | -9.3% | -0.8% | +21.3% | +28.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | -10.6% | -3.7% | +14.9% | +22.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +9.4% | +10.2% | +27.2% | +21.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +28.9% | +9.6% | +10.5% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.6% | -22.7% | +2.3% | +26.7% | +22.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SPSC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, PAYC trades at a 37% valuation discount to PCTY's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAYC offers better value at 0.64x vs SPSC's 1.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $1.9B | $2.1B | $5.9B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $5.8B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.24x | -37.89x | -53.88x | 27.14x | 17.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.73x | 21.69x | 19.64x | 14.05x | 13.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.62x | — | — | 0.96x | 0.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.30x | — | 121.97x | 14.25x | 9.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.84x | 4.20x | 3.89x | 3.72x | 3.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.23x | 5.00x | 1.87x | 5.00x | 4.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.04x | 45.09x | 39.45x | 17.31x | 18.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | -14.0% | -2.1% | +22.4% | +31.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | -5.9% | -1.4% | +4.9% | +9.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | -8.6% | -1.2% | +26.2% | +30.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | -9.3% | -1.5% | +23.3% | +27.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.98x | 0.22x | 0.18x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$141M | $290M | $116M | -$180M | -$218M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $151M | $63M | $121M | $398M | $370M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $354M | $237M | $218M | $152M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.73x | -0.51x | 23.29x | 95.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALKT and PAYC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCTY five years ago would be worth $6,478 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,144 for NCNO. Over the past 12 months, NCNO leads with a -22.1% total return vs SPSC's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 12.2% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.0% | -23.1% | -27.9% | -25.1% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.7% | -37.8% | -22.1% | -40.6% | -38.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.6% | +41.1% | -21.0% | -37.1% | -47.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.9% | -54.9% | -68.6% | -35.2% | -56.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.8% | -59.5% | -80.6% | +218.2% | +271.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.0% | +12.2% | -7.6% | -14.3% | -19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKT and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALKT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKT currently trades 55.1% from its 52-week high vs SPSC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 1.30x | 1.18x | 0.43x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $153.16 | $31.66 | $33.92 | $201.97 | $267.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.56 | $14.11 | $13.80 | $92.99 | $104.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +55.1% | +52.4% | +54.0% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 50.9 | 50.1 | 45.7 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 605K | 1.9M | 2.7M | 733K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PAYC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPSC as "Hold", ALKT as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", PAYC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs 7.9% for PAYC (target: $149). PAYC is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.71 | $22.00 | $32.33 | $168.08 | $149.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 12 | 23 | 41 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% | +4.3% |
PAYC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SPSC vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY vs PAYC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC?
On trailing P/E, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Paylocity Holding Corporation at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Paycom Software, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. 's 0. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC?
Over the past 5 years, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) delivered a total return of -35.
2%, compared to -68. 6% for nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAYC returned +271. 8% versus NCNO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Alkami Technology, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning ALKT is approximately 204% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus 8. 9% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SPS Commerce, Inc. grew EPS 20. 6% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC?
Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYC leads at 27. 6% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAYC leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. 's 0. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Alkami Technology, Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC?
In this comparison, PAYC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SPSC, ALKT, NCNO, PCTY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPSC or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY or PAYC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 1. 1% yield, +271. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAYC: +271. 8%, ALKT: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPSC and ALKT and NCNO and PCTY and PAYC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAYC is a small-cap deep-value stock. PAYC pays a dividend while SPSC, ALKT, NCNO, PCTY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.