Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPSC vs GDDY vs HUBS vs SHOP vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
SPSC vs GDDY vs HUBS vs SHOP vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.14B | $11.97B | $12.58B | $145.00B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $762M | $5.02B | $3.30B | $12.37B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $91M | $870M | $100M | $1.33B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | 61.8% | 83.7% | 48.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 17.6% | 1.9% | 13.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 12.9x | 19.6x | 60.9x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $3.86B | $485M | $188M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $151M | $1.08B | $882M | $1.53B | $86.81B |
SPSC vs GDDY vs HUBS vs SHOP vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 83.9 | -16.1% |
| GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) | 100 | 116.2 | +16.2% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 122.2 | +22.2% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPSC vs GDDY vs HUBS vs SHOP vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPSC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
- PEG 0.89 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.74x
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.24
GDDY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.42
- 17.3% margin vs HUBS's 3.0%
- Beta 0.42 vs SHOP's 2.64
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 30.1% revenue growth vs GDDY's 8.3%
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs SHOP's 41.2%
- +43.7% vs HUBS's -62.0%
- 11.5% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs GDDY's 8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs HUBS's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs 0.4% |
SPSC vs GDDY vs HUBS vs SHOP vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPSC vs GDDY vs HUBS vs SHOP vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GDDY leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 1 • SPSC leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDDY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 974.7x SPSC's $762M. GDDY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUBS's 3.0%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $762M | $5.0B | $3.3B | $12.4B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $162M | $1.1B | $166M | $1.7B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $91M | $870M | $100M | $1.3B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $167M | $1.6B | $712M | $2.1B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.0% | +61.8% | +83.7% | +48.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +17.6% | +1.9% | +13.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +17.3% | +3.0% | +10.8% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +32.7% | +21.6% | +17.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +6.1% | +23.4% | +34.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.6% | +6.0% | +2.5% | +15.1% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GDDY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, GDDY trades at a 95% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $12.0B | $12.6B | $145.0B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $14.8B | $12.2B | $143.7B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.24x | 14.41x | 284.08x | 118.87x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.73x | 12.89x | 19.61x | 60.91x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.62x | — | — | 4.06x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.30x | 11.03x | 69.24x | 95.83x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.84x | 2.42x | 4.02x | 12.55x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.23x | 56.82x | 6.29x | 10.82x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.04x | 7.60x | 17.77x | 72.25x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SPSC and GDDY each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GDDY delivers a 3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $5 for HUBS. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GDDY's 17.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPSC scores 6/9 vs GDDY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +3.7% | +5.0% | +10.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | +10.7% | +2.7% | +9.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +26.2% | +0.4% | +9.4% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +21.4% | +0.5% | +11.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 17.96x | 0.23x | 0.01x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$141M | $2.8B | -$397M | -$1.3B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $151M | $1.1B | $882M | $1.5B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $3.9B | $485M | $188M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 10.89x | 4753.07x | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,794 for HUBS. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.0% | -24.3% | -36.1% | -28.9% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.7% | -51.0% | -62.0% | +18.2% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.6% | +28.1% | -45.1% | +73.6% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.9% | +10.7% | -52.1% | +0.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.8% | +197.1% | +469.1% | +4123.0% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.0% | +8.6% | -18.1% | +20.2% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GDDY and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GDDY is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.42x | 1.18x | 2.64x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $153.16 | $190.50 | $682.57 | $182.19 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.56 | $73.06 | $187.45 | $88.14 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +47.1% | +35.8% | +61.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 49.3 | 51.1 | 34.7 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 605K | 2.2M | 1.5M | 8.7M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPSC as "Hold", GDDY as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.7% upside for HUBS (target: $361) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.71 | $113.29 | $360.89 | $164.75 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 38 | 47 | 63 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +13.4% | +4.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GDDY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMZN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SPSC vs GDDY vs HUBS vs SHOP vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY). GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPS Commerce, Inc. wins at 0. 89x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -52. 1% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus SPSC's +119. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 525% more volatile than GDDY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 18% for GoDaddy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus 8. 3% for GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN?
GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 7% net margin versus 1. 5% for HubSpot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDDY leads at 22. 9% versus 0. 4% for HUBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 48. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBS: 47. 7% to $360. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SPSC or GDDY or HUBS or SHOP or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), +197. 1% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GDDY: +197. 1%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPSC and GDDY and HUBS and SHOP and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPSC (Technology) and GDDY (Technology) and HUBS (Technology) and SHOP (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GDDY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.