Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPWH vs RGR vs ASO vs SWBI vs AOUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Specialty Retail
Aerospace & Defense
Leisure
SPWH vs RGR vs ASO vs SWBI vs AOUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Aerospace & Defense | Specialty Retail | Aerospace & Defense | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $55M | $623M | $3.48B | $655M | $146M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $552M | $6.05B | $486M | $205M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $-12M | $377M | $12M | $-10M |
| Gross Margin | 31.2% | 14.4% | 34.8% | 26.4% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | -4.1% | 8.5% | 4.6% | -4.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.6x | 9.1x | 53.6x | 66.2x |
| Total Debt | $455M | $2M | $1.41B | $115M | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $18M | $330M | $25M | $23M |
SPWH vs RGR vs ASO vs SWBI vs AOUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 10.9 | -89.1% |
| Sturm, Ruger & Comp… (RGR) | 100 | 58.4 | -41.6% |
| Academy Sports and … (ASO) | 100 | 364.3 | +264.3% |
| Smith & Wesson Bran… (SWBI) | 100 | 88.8 | -11.2% |
| American Outdoor Br… (AOUT) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPWH vs RGR vs ASO vs SWBI vs AOUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPWH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, RGR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ASO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 325.9% 10Y total return vs SWBI's -3.7%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 66.2x)
- 6.2% margin vs AOUT's -4.8%
- 7.1% ROA vs RGR's -4.7%, ROIC 11.4% vs -3.0%
SWBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 30.8%, current ratio 4.16x
- Beta 0.74, yield 3.5%, current ratio 4.16x
- Beta 0.74 vs SPWH's 1.80, lower leverage
AOUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.5%
- 10.6% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 66.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs AOUT's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SPWH's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs RGR's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.8% vs SPWH's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs RGR's -4.7%, ROIC 11.4% vs -3.0% |
SPWH vs RGR vs ASO vs SWBI vs AOUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPWH vs RGR vs ASO vs SWBI vs AOUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWBI leads in 4 of 6 categories
SPWH leads 1 • ASO leads 1 • RGR leads 0 • AOUT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASO is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 29.5x AOUT's $205M. ASO is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AOUT's -4.8%. On growth, SWBI holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $552M | $6.1B | $486M | $205M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | -$5M | $635M | $30M | $344,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | -$12M | $377M | $12M | -$10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$55M | $42M | $264M | $73M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +14.4% | +34.8% | +26.4% | +43.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | -4.1% | +8.5% | +4.6% | -4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -2.2% | +6.2% | +2.5% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +7.7% | +4.4% | +15.0% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | +4.1% | +2.5% | +17.1% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | -97.8% | +8.2% | +122.4% | -25.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, ASO trades at a 80% valuation discount to SWBI's 49.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASO's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RGR's 53.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $623M | $3.5B | $655M | $146M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $507M | $606M | $4.6B | $745M | $156M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.63x | -144.63x | 9.67x | 49.10x | -1600.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.61x | 9.11x | 53.56x | 66.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.94x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.78x | 53.83x | 7.18x | 13.37x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.05x | 1.14x | 0.57x | 1.38x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 2.23x | 1.68x | 1.76x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.78x | 16.19x | 15.66x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASO delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SPWH. RGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPWH's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASO scores 7/9 vs SWBI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.9% | -4.2% | +18.1% | +3.3% | -5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | -4.7% | +7.1% | +2.2% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | -3.0% | +11.4% | +4.1% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | -3.8% | +12.5% | +4.9% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.93x | 0.01x | 0.65x | 0.31x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $452M | -$17M | $1.1B | $90M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $18M | $330M | $25M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $455M | $2M | $1.4B | $115M | $33M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.26x | -353.50x | 14.33x | 5.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWBI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASO five years ago would be worth $16,362 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $800 for SPWH. Over the past 12 months, SWBI leads with a +65.8% total return vs SPWH's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWBI at 10.9% vs SPWH's -38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | +16.9% | +3.0% | +48.9% | +21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.4% | +19.8% | +39.1% | +65.8% | -16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.2% | -23.0% | -9.4% | +36.4% | +17.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | -26.4% | +63.6% | -13.9% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | -4.9% | +325.9% | -3.7% | -38.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.9% | -8.4% | -3.2% | +10.9% | +5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWH's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWBI currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.00x | 1.72x | 0.74x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.33 | $48.21 | $62.45 | $15.79 | $13.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.08 | $28.33 | $37.96 | $7.73 | $6.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.8% | +81.0% | +85.7% | +93.3% | +71.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 42.6 | 46.2 | 51.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 833K | 163K | 1.4M | 596K | 38K |
Analyst Outlook
SWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RGR as "Buy", ASO as "Buy", SWBI as "Buy", AOUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for AOUT (target: $13) vs 3.5% for SWBI (target: $15). For income investors, SWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs ASO's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $58.00 | $15.25 | $12.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 22 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | +1.0% | +3.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.62 | $0.51 | $0.52 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +4.2% | +5.7% | +3.9% | +2.6% |
SWBI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SPWH vs RGR vs ASO vs SWBI vs AOUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Outdoor Brands, Inc.
(AOUT) is the stronger pick with 10. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT?
On trailing P/E, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
(ASO) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. at 49. 1x. On forward P/E, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT?
Over the past 5 years, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
(ASO) delivered a total return of +63. 6%, compared to -92. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASO returned +325. 9% versus SPWH's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning SPWH is approximately 144% more volatile than SWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Outdoor Brands, Inc.
(AOUT) is pulling ahead at 10. 6% versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Outdoor Brands, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -115. 3% for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASO leads at -1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT?
Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
(ASO) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus -2. 8% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASO leads at 8. 5% versus -2. 1% for RGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AOUT leads at 44. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
(ASO) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 66. 2x for American Outdoor Brands, Inc. — 57. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AOUT: 30. 1% to $12. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT?
In this comparison, SWBI (3.
5% yield), RGR (1. 6% yield), ASO (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SPWH, AOUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPWH or RGR or ASO or SWBI or AOUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 3. 5% yield). Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWBI: -3. 7%, SPWH: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPWH and RGR and ASO and SWBI and AOUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPWH (Consumer Cyclical) and RGR (Industrials) and ASO (Consumer Cyclical) and SWBI (Industrials) and AOUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SWBI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AOUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RGR, ASO, SWBI pay a dividend while SPWH, AOUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.