Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SSB vs HBAN vs CFG vs UMBF vs IBOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SSB vs HBAN vs CFG vs UMBF vs IBOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.79B | $25.63B | $27.70B | $9.99B | $4.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.76B | $12.48B | $12.35B | $4.44B | $1.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $799M | $2.21B | $1.70B | $883M | $418M |
| Gross Margin | 68.3% | 61.7% | 57.6% | 54.4% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 21.5% | 15.3% | 20.3% | 49.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 11.1x | 12.4x | 10.3x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.31B | $18.48B | $12.40B | $3.80B | $705M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $583M | $1.78B | $11.24B | $953M | $536M |
SSB vs HBAN vs CFG vs UMBF vs IBOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SouthState Corporat… (SSB) | 100 | 185.3 | +85.3% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
| Citizens Financial … (CFG) | 100 | 266.4 | +166.4% |
| UMB Financial Corpo… (UMBF) | 100 | 255.8 | +155.8% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSB vs HBAN vs CFG vs UMBF vs IBOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 2.4%
- PEG 0.35 vs UMBF's 1.14
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.3x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.14
HBAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 3.7% yield, vs UMBF's 1.4%
CFG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 257.8% 10Y total return vs IBOC's 229.3%
- +73.3% vs HBAN's +12.4%
UMBF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 68.5%, EPS growth 1.6%
- 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
IBOC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.83, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.04x
- NIM 4.0% vs CFG's 2.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CFG's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.3x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CFG's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs CFG's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs UMBF's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.3% vs HBAN's +12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CFG's 0.4% |
SSB vs HBAN vs CFG vs UMBF vs IBOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SSB vs HBAN vs CFG vs UMBF vs IBOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 4 of 6 categories
CFG leads 1 • SSB leads 0 • HBAN leads 0 • UMBF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 11.8x IBOC's $1.1B. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CFG's 12.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.8B | $12.5B | $12.3B | $4.4B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $3.1B | $2.6B | $1.1B | $417M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $799M | $2.2B | $1.7B | $883M | $418M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | $2.3B | $2.7B | $985M | $360M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.3% | +61.7% | +57.6% | +54.4% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +21.5% | +15.3% | +20.3% | +49.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +17.7% | +12.2% | +15.8% | +39.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +18.2% | +15.2% | +22.0% | +47.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.9% | -11.8% | +38.2% | +176.9% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IBOC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, IBOC trades at a 48% valuation discount to CFG's 21.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SSB offers better value at 0.43x vs UMBF's 1.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.8B | $25.6B | $27.7B | $10.0B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $42.3B | $28.9B | $12.8B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.39x | 11.65x | 21.19x | 14.37x | 11.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.30x | 11.10x | 12.39x | 10.31x | 10.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 0.77x | — | 1.59x | 0.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.98x | 15.75x | 12.10x | 12.11x | 8.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.61x | 2.05x | 2.24x | 2.25x | 4.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.00x | 1.20x | 1.30x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.25x | 14.74x | 10.21x | 9.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFG. SSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBAN's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFG scores 7/9 vs SSB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +10.0% | +6.6% | +11.7% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +5.1% | +3.8% | +7.5% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +4.5% | +4.4% | +14.4% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.76x | 0.51x | 0.49x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $731M | $16.7B | $1.2B | $2.8B | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $583M | $1.8B | $11.2B | $953M | $536M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $18.5B | $12.4B | $3.8B | $705M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 0.62x | 0.55x | 0.63x | 1.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBOC five years ago would be worth $16,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,035 for SSB. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +73.3% total return vs HBAN's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CFG at 39.1% vs SSB's 17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | -6.5% | +9.7% | +13.0% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.3% | +12.4% | +73.3% | +31.1% | +20.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.3% | +85.1% | +169.3% | +143.7% | +88.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.3% | +22.0% | +46.9% | +41.5% | +61.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.9% | +121.5% | +257.8% | +165.1% | +229.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +22.8% | +39.1% | +34.6% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
IBOC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CFG's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs HBAN's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 1.09x | 1.33x | 1.19x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $108.46 | $19.46 | $68.79 | $136.11 | $75.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.48 | $14.87 | $37.93 | $98.16 | $61.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +83.2% | +93.3% | +96.4% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 53.4 | 60.2 | 78.4 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 841K | 24.3M | 4.5M | 613K | 373K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HBAN and UMBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSB as "Buy", HBAN as "Buy", CFG as "Buy", UMBF as "Buy", IBOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs 12.8% for CFG (target: $72). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs UMBF's 1.35%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $118.20 | $20.38 | $72.42 | $150.40 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 48 | 38 | 18 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +3.7% | +2.6% | +1.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.30 | $0.60 | $1.70 | $1.77 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | 0.0% | +4.9% | +1.3% | +0.1% |
IBOC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SSB vs HBAN vs CFG vs UMBF vs IBOC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the stronger pick with 68.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SouthState Corporation (SSB) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC?
On trailing P/E, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, SouthState Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SouthState Corporation wins at 0. 35x versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC?
Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +61.
3%, compared to +20. 3% for SouthState Corporation (SSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFG returned +257. 8% versus SSB's +67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning CFG is approximately 61% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SouthState Corporation (SSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 76% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is pulling ahead at 68.
5% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntington Bancshares Incorporated grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -3. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 12. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SouthState Corporation (SSB) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 25. 9% to $20. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 4% for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF).
09Is SSB or HBAN or CFG or UMBF or IBOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, CFG: +257. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSB and HBAN and CFG and UMBF and IBOC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SSB is a small-cap high-growth stock; HBAN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; UMBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.