Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SSBI vs CZWI vs BSVN vs HAFC vs CBNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SSBI vs CZWI vs BSVN vs HAFC vs CBNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $90M | $207M | $446M | $949M | $556M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $90M | $137M | $444M | $304M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $14M | $43M | $76M | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 54.7% | 69.7% | 57.4% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 7.0% | 41.4% | 24.3% | 24.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 11.8x | 10.5x | 10.0x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $52M | $0.00 | $280M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $119M | $245M | $213M | $31M |
SSBI vs CZWI vs BSVN vs HAFC vs CBNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit State Bank (SSBI) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 327.0 | +227.0% |
| Capital Bancorp, In… (CBNK) | 100 | 318.4 | +218.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSBI vs CZWI vs BSVN vs HAFC vs CBNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SSBI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs CBNK's 0.84
- +52.1% vs CBNK's +6.5%
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.1%
- 169.2% 10Y total return vs CBNK's 179.0%
- PEG 0.61 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.61 vs 2.32
HAFC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BSVN's 2.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CBNK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 60.4%
- NIM 5.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 25.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.61 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBNK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs CBNK's 0.84 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BSVN's 2.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs CBNK's +6.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBNK's 0.5% |
SSBI vs CZWI vs BSVN vs HAFC vs CBNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SSBI vs CZWI vs BSVN vs HAFC vs CBNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SSBI leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • HAFC leads 0 • CBNK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $444M annually — 7.6x SSBI's $59M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSBI's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $90M | $137M | $444M | $304M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $9M | $58M | $110M | $79M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $14M | $43M | $76M | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $11M | $36M | $204M | $67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +54.7% | +69.7% | +57.4% | +73.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +7.0% | +41.4% | +24.3% | +24.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +16.0% | +31.4% | +17.1% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +12.4% | +26.4% | +45.8% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +63.0% | -3.4% | +20.7% | +102.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SSBI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, CBNK trades at a 32% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.61x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $207M | $446M | $949M | $556M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $140M | $202M | $1.0B | $577M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.32x | 14.70x | 10.33x | 12.65x | 10.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | 10.46x | 10.05x | 9.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.90x | 0.61x | 1.00x | 0.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.37x | 15.69x | 3.48x | 8.95x | 7.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 2.29x | 3.25x | 2.13x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 1.11x | 1.77x | 1.20x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.71x | 19.90x | 10.78x | 4.66x | 8.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for SSBI. SSBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAFC's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs BSVN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +7.8% | +18.2% | +9.8% | +14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.8% | +2.3% | +1.0% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +2.0% | +18.3% | +7.4% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +0.6% | +5.2% | +2.5% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.28x | — | 0.35x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$60M | -$67M | -$245M | $68M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $119M | $245M | $213M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $52M | $0 | $280M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.16x | 1.39x | 0.62x | 1.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,051 for SSBI. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs CBNK's +6.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs SSBI's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +24.3% | +13.0% | +20.3% | +22.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.7% | +52.1% | +20.3% | +39.4% | +6.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.8% | +153.7% | +97.2% | +116.0% | +89.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | +69.0% | +189.1% | +80.5% | +75.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.1% | +149.0% | +169.2% | +73.3% | +179.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | +36.4% | +25.4% | +29.3% | +23.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSBI and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSBI is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBNK's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAFC currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.50x | 0.64x | 0.82x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $22.62 | $50.10 | $31.87 | $36.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.40 | $12.83 | $37.56 | $22.00 | $26.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +94.9% | +92.8% | +99.6% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 51.2 | 62.6 | 62.5 | 68.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 41K | 11K | 203K | 66K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BSVN and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", BSVN as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold", CBNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 5.5% for HAFC (target: $34). For income investors, HAFC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.42% vs CBNK's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $57.00 | $33.50 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 3 | 11 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +2.1% | +3.4% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $0.98 | $1.09 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.3% | +1.0% | +2.1% |
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SSBI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SSBI vs CZWI vs BSVN vs HAFC vs CBNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK?
On trailing P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 61x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +10. 5% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBNK returned +179. 0% versus SSBI's +73. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Summit State Bank (SSBI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
03β versus Capital Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 84β — meaning CBNK is approximately -2860% more volatile than SSBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit State Bank (SSBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 35% for Hanmi Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Summit State Bank grew EPS 262. 9% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 11. 6% for Summit State Bank — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBNK leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 22. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK?
In this comparison, HAFC (3.
4% yield), BSVN (2. 1% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield), CBNK (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SSBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSBI or CZWI or BSVN or HAFC or CBNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, HAFC: +73. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSBI and CZWI and BSVN and HAFC and CBNK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SSBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBNK is a small-cap high-growth stock. CZWI, BSVN, HAFC, CBNK pay a dividend while SSBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.