Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SSBI vs HAFC vs HOPE vs BCAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SSBI vs HAFC vs HOPE vs BCAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $90M | $949M | $1.69B | $636M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $444M | $968M | $233M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $76M | $59M | $63M |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 57.4% | 48.6% | 79.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 24.3% | 8.3% | 37.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 10.0x | 12.3x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $280M | $396M | $72M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $213M | $560M | $52M |
SSBI vs HAFC vs HOPE vs BCAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit State Bank (SSBI) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 327.0 | +227.0% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 204.9 | +104.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSBI vs HAFC vs HOPE vs BCAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSBI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
HAFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 3.4%
- Beta 0.82, yield 3.4%, current ratio 49.21x
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 13.3x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
HOPE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BCAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- 142.1% 10Y total return vs HAFC's 73.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 12.4%, current ratio 0.24x
- PEG 0.38 vs HAFC's 0.79
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs SSBI's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 13.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs HOPE's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HOPE's 4.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs HOPE's +31.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% |
SSBI vs HAFC vs HOPE vs BCAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SSBI vs HAFC vs HOPE vs BCAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCAL leads in 2 of 6 categories
HAFC leads 1 • SSBI leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $968M annually — 16.4x SSBI's $59M. BCAL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $444M | $968M | $233M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $110M | $84M | $92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $76M | $59M | $63M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $204M | $147M | $57M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +57.4% | +48.6% | +79.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +24.3% | +8.3% | +37.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +17.1% | +6.0% | +27.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +45.8% | +15.2% | +24.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +20.7% | +35.0% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SSBI and HAFC and BCAL each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, BCAL trades at a 64% valuation discount to HOPE's 28.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.32x vs HAFC's 1.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $949M | $1.7B | $636M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $1.0B | $1.5B | $655M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.32x | 12.65x | 28.67x | 10.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.05x | 12.33x | 11.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.00x | — | 0.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.37x | 8.95x | 18.21x | 7.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 2.13x | 1.74x | 2.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 1.20x | 0.74x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.71x | 4.66x | 11.14x | 11.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCAL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCAL delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. SSBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAFC's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs HOPE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +9.8% | +2.6% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.0% | +0.3% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +7.4% | +2.3% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +2.5% | +0.9% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.35x | 0.17x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$60M | $68M | -$164M | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $213M | $560M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $280M | $396M | $72M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.62x | 0.17x | 1.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $18,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,696 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +39.4% total return vs HOPE's +31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 29.3% vs SSBI's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +20.3% | +22.7% | +7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.7% | +39.4% | +31.7% | +34.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.8% | +116.0% | +66.1% | +45.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | +80.5% | +7.0% | +42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.1% | +73.3% | +19.5% | +142.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | +29.3% | +18.4% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSBI and HOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSBI is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOPE currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SSBI's 96.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.82x | 0.97x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $31.87 | $13.19 | $20.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.40 | $22.00 | $9.44 | $14.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +99.6% | +100.0% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 62.5 | 64.6 | 65.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 203K | 803K | 166K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HAFC and HOPE and BCAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAFC as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", BCAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.3% upside for BCAL (target: $22) vs 5.5% for HAFC (target: $34). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs BCAL's 0.50%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.50 | $14.50 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 6 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.4% | +4.2% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.09 | $0.55 | $0.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
BCAL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAFC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SSBI vs HAFC vs HOPE vs BCAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL?
On trailing P/E, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 38x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL?
Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +80.
5%, compared to +7. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCAL returned +142. 1% versus HOPE's +19. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Summit State Bank (SSBI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
03β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning HOPE is approximately -3258% more volatile than SSBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit State Bank (SSBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 35% for Hanmi Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -5. 2% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL?
Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
1% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCAL leads at 37. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCAL leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCAL: 11. 3% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL?
In this comparison, HOPE (4.
2% yield), HAFC (3. 4% yield), BCAL (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SSBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSBI or HAFC or HOPE or BCAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Summit State Bank (SSBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSBI: +73. 1%, HOPE: +19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSBI and HAFC and HOPE and BCAL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SSBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. HAFC, HOPE, BCAL pay a dividend while SSBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.