Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs NBTB vs CNOB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
STBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs NBTB vs CNOB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $4.13B | $3.80B | $2.35B | $1.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $569M | $1.89B | $1.36B | $867M | $606M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $134M | $392M | $287M | $169M | $80M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 67.4% | 74.7% | 72.1% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.5% | 25.7% | 28.0% | 25.3% | 18.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.0x | 10.6x | 11.8x | 10.8x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $311M | $1.30B | $303M | $327M | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $163M | $271M | $1.33B | $185M | $92M |
STBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs NBTB vs CNOB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| S&T Bancorp, Inc. (STBA) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.3 | +91.3% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 260.4 | +160.4% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs NBTB vs CNOB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STBA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 21.2%, current ratio 6.98x
- PEG 0.26 vs NBTB's 1.53
- Beta 0.84, yield 3.1%, current ratio 6.98x
- NIM 3.5% vs CNOB's 2.5%
FULT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 32.5%
- 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 129.0% 10Y total return vs STBA's 126.7%
- +37.7% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
CNOB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1%
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 11.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.7% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
STBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs NBTB vs CNOB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs NBTB vs CNOB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STBA leads in 2 of 6 categories
WSFS leads 2 • FULT leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • CNOB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STBA leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 3.3x STBA's $569M. STBA is the more profitable business, keeping 23.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNOB's 13.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $569M | $1.9B | $1.4B | $867M | $606M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $168M | $529M | $408M | $241M | $122M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $134M | $392M | $287M | $169M | $80M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $267M | $214M | $225M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +67.4% | +74.7% | +72.1% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +25.7% | +28.0% | +25.3% | +18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +20.7% | +21.1% | +19.5% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +15.0% | +15.7% | +25.2% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +47.2% | +22.9% | +39.5% | +53.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FULT and CNOB each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 49% valuation discount to CNOB's 20.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STBA offers better value at 0.28x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $4.1B | $3.8B | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $5.2B | $2.8B | $2.5B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.76x | 10.31x | 14.16x | 13.53x | 20.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.96x | 10.61x | 11.79x | 10.80x | 9.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 0.74x | 0.81x | 1.92x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.16x | 9.74x | 6.80x | 10.35x | 22.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 2.18x | 2.79x | 2.71x | 2.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.13x | 1.44x | 1.21x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.66x | 14.52x | 17.79x | 10.75x | 14.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +11.6% | +10.6% | +9.5% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +7.5% | +9.5% | +7.9% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +9.5% | +10.3% | +2.4% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.37x | 0.11x | 0.17x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $148M | $1.0B | -$1.0B | $142M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $163M | $271M | $1.3B | $185M | $92M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $311M | $1.3B | $303M | $327M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 0.84x | 1.30x | 1.05x | 0.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STBA five years ago would be worth $14,883 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,794 for CNOB. Over the past 12 months, WSFS leads with a +37.7% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.4% | +11.1% | +31.2% | +9.3% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.8% | +29.6% | +37.7% | +9.0% | +30.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.7% | +130.4% | +135.3% | +54.1% | +124.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.8% | +41.4% | +43.1% | +29.9% | +17.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.7% | +106.1% | +129.0% | +102.2% | +109.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.7% | +32.1% | +33.0% | +15.5% | +30.9% |
Risk & Volatility
STBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STBA is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STBA currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs FULT's 93.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.13x | 0.89x | 0.89x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.17 | $22.99 | $73.22 | $46.92 | $30.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.01 | $16.60 | $49.92 | $39.20 | $21.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +93.3% | +98.4% | +96.1% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 55.8 | 64.0 | 57.3 | 66.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 245K | 2.0M | 385K | 236K | 354K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FULT and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STBA as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for CNOB (target: $34) vs -15.4% for STBA (target: $38). For income investors, FULT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.59% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.67 | $24.00 | $74.67 | $46.00 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 20 | 13 | 10 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +3.6% | +0.9% | +3.2% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.37 | $0.77 | $0.68 | $1.43 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +1.6% | +7.6% | +0.4% | +0.1% |
STBA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). WSFS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
STBA vs FULT vs WSFS vs NBTB vs CNOB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. at 20. 2x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: S&T Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB?
Over the past 5 years, S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) delivered a total return of +48. 8%, compared to +17. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSFS returned +129. 0% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 34% more volatile than STBA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -15. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB?
S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 6% net margin versus 13. 3% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STBA leads at 29. 5% versus 18. 6% for CNOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, S&T Bancorp, Inc. (STBA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for S&T Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNOB: 13. 7% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is STBA or FULT or WSFS or NBTB or CNOB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 3. 1% yield, +126. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STBA: +126. 7%, FULT: +106. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STBA and FULT and WSFS and NBTB and CNOB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STBA is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.