Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STEM vs TSLA vs ENPH vs SEDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Solar
Solar
STEM vs TSLA vs ENPH vs SEDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Auto - Manufacturers | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $91M | $1.50T | $4.72B | $2.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $153M | $97.88B | $1.40B | $1.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $144M | $3.88B | $135M | $-364M |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 19.1% | 44.2% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -35.1% | 5.0% | 6.8% | -18.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 206.1x | 17.8x | 642.6x |
| Total Debt | $369M | $8.38B | $1.24B | $423M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $16.51B | $474M | $540M |
STEM vs TSLA vs ENPH vs SEDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 5.5 | -94.5% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 308.1 | +208.1% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG) | 100 | 15.8 | -84.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STEM vs TSLA vs ENPH vs SEDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STEM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 94.2% margin vs SEDG's -28.6%
- 43.2% ROA vs SEDG's -19.8%, ROIC -57.1% vs -29.5%
TSLA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 26.8% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.6%
ENPH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- beta 1.70
- PEG 2.82 vs TSLA's 5.32
- Lower P/E (17.8x vs 642.6x)
- Beta 1.70 vs STEM's 3.66
SEDG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 78.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.03, Low D/E 99.1%, current ratio 2.17x
- Beta 2.03, current ratio 2.17x
- 31.4% revenue growth vs TSLA's -2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs TSLA's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.8x vs 642.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.2% margin vs SEDG's -28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs STEM's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.6% vs ENPH's -18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 43.2% ROA vs SEDG's -19.8%, ROIC -57.1% vs -29.5% |
STEM vs TSLA vs ENPH vs SEDG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STEM vs TSLA vs ENPH vs SEDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ENPH leads in 3 of 6 categories
TSLA leads 1 • STEM leads 0 • SEDG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.9B annually — 640.8x STEM's $153M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEDG's -28.6%. On growth, SEDG holds the edge at +41.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $153M | $97.9B | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $9.5B | $171M | -$225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $144M | $3.9B | $135M | -$364M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $7.0B | $145M | $78M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +19.1% | +44.2% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.1% | +5.0% | +6.8% | -18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +94.2% | +4.0% | +9.6% | -28.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +7.2% | +10.4% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.8% | +15.8% | -20.6% | +41.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.2% | +11.9% | -127.3% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.8x trailing earnings, ENPH trades at a 92% valuation discount to TSLA's 369.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ENPH offers better value at 4.40x vs TSLA's 9.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $91M | $1.50T | $4.7B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $411M | $1.49T | $5.5B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.16x | 369.01x | 27.75x | -5.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 206.10x | 17.77x | 642.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.52x | 4.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 141.61x | 22.37x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 15.77x | 3.20x | 2.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.97x | 4.44x | 5.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.27x | 240.43x | 49.20x | 30.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-80 for SEDG. TSLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENPH's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs ENPH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +4.8% | +13.3% | -79.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +43.2% | +2.9% | +4.2% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.1% | +4.5% | +6.8% | -29.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.9% | +4.4% | +6.8% | -19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 1.14x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $320M | -$8.1B | $769M | -$116M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $16.5B | $474M | $540M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $369M | $8.4B | $1.2B | $423M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.43x | 17.04x | 47.60x | -2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $18,019 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $257 for STEM. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +182.6% total return vs ENPH's -18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 32.4% vs STEM's -49.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.0% | -9.0% | +6.1% | +29.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.8% | +44.7% | -18.4% | +182.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +132.0% | -78.1% | -86.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +80.2% | -70.6% | -81.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | +2681.1% | +1764.6% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.5% | +32.4% | -39.7% | -48.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TSLA and ENPH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENPH is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLA currently trades 79.9% from its 52-week high vs STEM's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.66x | 2.06x | 1.70x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.23 | $498.83 | $54.43 | $53.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.93 | $271.00 | $25.78 | $13.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.2% | +79.9% | +65.8% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 54.9 | 52.7 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 147K | 61.5M | 5.9M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STEM as "Hold", TSLA as "Hold", ENPH as "Hold", SEDG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 93.4% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs -13.6% for SEDG (target: $35).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.67 | $450.45 | $43.48 | $35.09 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 81 | 55 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% | 0.0% |
ENPH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TSLA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
STEM vs TSLA vs ENPH vs SEDG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 8x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stem, Inc. (STEM) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG?
On trailing P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the cheapest at 27. 8x versus Tesla, Inc. at 369. 0x. On forward P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Enphase Energy, Inc. wins at 2. 82x versus Tesla, Inc. 's 5. 32x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) delivered a total return of +80. 2%, compared to -97. 4% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +26. 8% versus STEM's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 116% more volatile than ENPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 114% for Enphase Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -2. 9% for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Tesla, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSLA leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -34. 2% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus -38. 7% for STEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 82x versus Tesla, Inc. 's 5. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) trades at 17. 8x forward P/E versus 642. 6x for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — 624. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STEM: 93. 4% to $20. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is STEM or TSLA or ENPH or SEDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1765% 10Y return). Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1765%, STEM: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STEM and TSLA and ENPH and SEDG?
These companies operate in different sectors (STEM (Technology) and TSLA (Consumer Cyclical) and ENPH (Energy) and SEDG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TSLA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.