Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STNE vs PAX vs ITUB vs BX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Regional
Asset Management
STNE vs PAX vs ITUB vs BX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Asset Management | Banks - Regional | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.71B | $1.92B | $90.15B | $95.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.82B | $384M | $384.58B | $13.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.29B | $86M | $44.86B | $3.02B |
| Gross Margin | 68.4% | 96.2% | 34.5% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 38.6% | 34.2% | 13.1% | 51.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 8.4x | 1.7x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $17.57B | $199M | $1.01T | $13.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.82B | $54M | $270.61B | $2.63B |
STNE vs PAX vs ITUB vs BX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| Patria Investments … (PAX) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
| Itaú Unibanco Holdi… (ITUB) | 100 | 209.2 | +109.2% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STNE vs PAX vs ITUB vs BX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STNE is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.04 vs PAX's 2.99
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 20.5x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.98
PAX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 31.4%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 1.09, yield 5.0%, current ratio 0.98x
- 22.3% margin vs ITUB's 11.7%
- Beta 1.09 vs STNE's 1.67, lower leverage
ITUB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 10.4%
- 10.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PAX's 5.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +44.4% vs BX's -6.5%
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
- 476.1% 10Y total return vs ITUB's 188.7%
- 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs STNE's -74.0%
- 6.5% ROA vs ITUB's 1.5%, ROIC 16.1% vs 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs STNE's -74.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 20.5x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.98 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs ITUB's 11.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs STNE's 1.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PAX's 5.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs BX's -6.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs ITUB's 1.5%, ROIC 16.1% vs 3.2% |
STNE vs PAX vs ITUB vs BX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
STNE vs PAX vs ITUB vs BX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITUB leads in 2 of 6 categories
PAX leads 1 • STNE leads 1 • BX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITUB is the larger business by revenue, generating $384.6B annually — 1002.0x PAX's $384M. PAX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITUB's 11.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.8B | $384M | $384.6B | $13.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.2B | $174M | $57.6B | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.3B | $86M | $44.9B | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$241M | $268M | $117.6B | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.4% | +96.2% | +34.5% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.6% | +34.2% | +13.1% | +51.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +22.3% | +11.7% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +67.3% | +33.3% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -77.4% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +119.7% | -40.5% | -11.4% | +41.3% |
Valuation Metrics
STNE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, STNE trades at a 79% valuation discount to BX's 31.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNE offers better value at 0.28x vs PAX's 7.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $1.9B | $90.2B | $95.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.3B | $2.1B | $240.0B | $106.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.56x | 22.30x | 10.30x | 31.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.03x | 8.42x | 1.74x | 20.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 7.92x | 0.50x | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.74x | 20.62x | 14.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.04x | 5.01x | 1.16x | 6.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 3.00x | 2.11x | 4.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.44x | 3.48x | 54.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PAX and BX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITUB delivers a 20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $14 for BX. PAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITUB's 4.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAX scores 6/9 vs ITUB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.9% | +14.4% | +20.6% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +6.3% | +1.5% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.4% | +12.5% | +3.2% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.9% | +13.9% | +2.8% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.31x | 4.71x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.8B | $145M | $742.0B | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.8B | $54M | $270.6B | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.6B | $199M | $1.01T | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.59x | 7.45x | 0.23x | 14.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITUB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITUB five years ago would be worth $24,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,172 for STNE. Over the past 12 months, ITUB leads with a +44.4% total return vs BX's -6.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITUB at 26.5% vs STNE's -0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.6% | -23.4% | +14.3% | -21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.6% | +14.9% | +44.4% | -6.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.7% | -1.4% | +102.5% | +65.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | +5.4% | +149.0% | +59.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | -19.3% | +188.7% | +476.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.6% | -0.5% | +26.5% | +18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAX and ITUB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAX is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STNE's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITUB currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs STNE's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 1.09x | 1.11x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.95 | $17.80 | $9.60 | $190.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.74 | $10.86 | $6.07 | $101.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.3% | +67.6% | +85.2% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.8 | 54.1 | 42.4 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 885K | 24.5M | 7.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ITUB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STNE as "Buy", PAX as "Buy", ITUB as "Buy", BX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.1% upside for STNE (target: $19) vs -22.0% for ITUB (target: $6). For income investors, ITUB offers the higher dividend yield at 10.45% vs PAX's 5.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $18.00 | $6.38 | $156.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 5 | 12 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.0% | +10.4% | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 | $4.23 | $7.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +21.8% | +2.9% | +0.7% | +0.3% |
ITUB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). PAX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
STNE vs PAX vs ITUB vs BX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 0% for StoneCo Ltd. (STNE). StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (1. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX?
On trailing P/E, StoneCo Ltd.
(STNE) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus Blackstone Inc. at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, StoneCo Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: StoneCo Ltd. wins at 0. 04x versus Patria Investments Limited's 2. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX?
Over the past 5 years, Itaú Unibanco Holding S.
A. (ITUB) delivered a total return of +149. 0%, compared to -78. 3% for StoneCo Ltd. (STNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BX returned +476. 1% versus STNE's -56. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
09β versus StoneCo Ltd. 's 1. 67β — meaning STNE is approximately 53% more volatile than PAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 5% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -74. 0% for StoneCo Ltd. (STNE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: StoneCo Ltd. grew EPS 265. 9% year-over-year, compared to 4. 0% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX?
StoneCo Ltd.
(STNE) is the more profitable company, earning 68. 6% net margin versus 11. 7% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. — meaning it keeps 68. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus -90. 2% for STNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAX leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Patria Investments Limited's 2. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Blackstone Inc. — 19. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STNE: 72. 1% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX?
In this comparison, ITUB (10.
4% yield), BX (6. 3% yield), PAX (5. 0% yield) pay a dividend. STNE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STNE or PAX or ITUB or BX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Itaú Unibanco Holding S.
A. (ITUB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 10. 4% yield, +188. 7% 10Y return). StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITUB: +188. 7%, STNE: -56. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STNE and PAX and ITUB and BX?
These companies operate in different sectors (STNE (Technology) and PAX (Financial Services) and ITUB (Financial Services) and BX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STNE is a small-cap deep-value stock; PAX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ITUB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAX, ITUB, BX pay a dividend while STNE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.