Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STRR vs MGRC vs TREX vs WSC vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Construction
Rental & Leasing Services
Construction
STRR vs MGRC vs TREX vs WSC vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Rental & Leasing Services | Construction | Rental & Leasing Services | Construction |
| Market Cap | $29M | $2.81B | $4.12B | $4.22B | $8.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114M | $947M | $1.18B | $2.27B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $155M | $191M | $-68M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | 45.9% | 39.2% | 48.4% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 25.5% | 22.1% | 20.3% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.7x | 24.0x | 26.1x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $528M | $229M | $4.14B | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $295K | $4M | $15M | $182M |
STRR vs MGRC vs TREX vs WSC vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Star Equity Holding… (STRR) | 100 | 109.2 | +9.2% |
| McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) | 100 | 205.6 | +105.6% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 210.6 | +110.6% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 371.9 | +271.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRR vs MGRC vs TREX vs WSC vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 3.58x
- Beta 0.19, yield 7.0%, current ratio 3.58x
- Beta 0.19 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage
MGRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth -32.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
- 3.7% revenue growth vs STRR's -66.9%
- 16.4% margin vs STRR's -5.4%
- +6.3% vs TREX's -30.8%
TREX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 12.3% ROA vs STRR's -8.7%, ROIC 16.4% vs -24.3%
Among these 5 stocks, WSC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs MGRC's 401.5%
- PEG 1.78 vs TREX's 7.16
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.0x), PEG 1.78 vs 7.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs STRR's -66.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.0x), PEG 1.78 vs 7.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs STRR's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MGRC's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs STRR's -8.7%, ROIC 16.4% vs -24.3% |
STRR vs MGRC vs TREX vs WSC vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STRR vs MGRC vs TREX vs WSC vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSC leads in 1 of 6 categories
TREX leads 1 • MGRC leads 1 • STRR leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STRR and MGRC and WSC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 130.6x STRR's $114M. MGRC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRR's -5.4%. On growth, STRR holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114M | $947M | $1.2B | $2.3B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $350M | $309M | $735M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $155M | $191M | -$68M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $196M | $263M | $579M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | +45.9% | +39.2% | +48.4% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +25.5% | +22.1% | +20.3% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +16.4% | +16.3% | -3.0% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +20.7% | +22.3% | +25.5% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +1.6% | +1.0% | -2.0% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.2% | -4.3% | +3.6% | -34.8% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WSC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.0x trailing earnings, MGRC trades at a 18% valuation discount to TREX's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGRC offers better value at 2.04x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $2.8B | $4.1B | $4.2B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $3.3B | $4.3B | $8.3B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.33x | 18.00x | 22.00x | -80.34x | 20.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.66x | 23.95x | 26.13x | 14.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.04x | 6.58x | — | 2.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.50x | 13.53x | 9.08x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 2.97x | 3.51x | 1.85x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 2.28x | 4.05x | 4.96x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.29x | 30.60x | 5.72x | 10.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX delivers a 18.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-13 for STRR. STRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRC scores 6/9 vs WSC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.0% | +12.8% | +18.8% | -7.1% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | +6.6% | +12.3% | -1.2% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.3% | +10.5% | +16.4% | +7.4% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.5% | +11.3% | +23.2% | +9.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.43x | 0.22x | 4.84x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $528M | $225M | $4.1B | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $295,000 | $4M | $15M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $528M | $229M | $4.1B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -47.19x | 8.35x | — | 0.19x | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLDR five years ago would be worth $15,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, MGRC leads with a +6.3% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGRC at 9.9% vs STRR's -25.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.3% | +9.6% | +9.3% | +20.0% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.0% | +6.3% | -30.8% | -11.0% | -25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.8% | +32.7% | -30.4% | -46.6% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.1% | +49.0% | -64.0% | -19.5% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.6% | +401.5% | +239.9% | +144.8% | +614.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.6% | +9.9% | -11.4% | -18.9% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STRR and MGRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSC's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGRC currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.87x | 1.52x | 2.13x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.99 | $128.41 | $68.78 | $31.88 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.99 | $94.99 | $29.77 | $14.91 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.1% | +89.0% | +56.9% | +73.1% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 50.3 | 51.3 | 68.4 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 213K | 1.7M | 2.2M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRR and MGRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MGRC as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", WSC as "Buy", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 11.6% for WSC (target: $26). For income investors, STRR offers the higher dividend yield at 7.01% vs WSC's 1.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $140.00 | $44.50 | $26.00 | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 31 | 13 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.0% | +1.7% | — | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 36 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $1.94 | — | $0.28 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +2.4% | +4.7% |
WSC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TREX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
STRR vs MGRC vs TREX vs WSC vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -66. 9% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR). McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the cheapest at 18.
0x versus Trex Company, Inc. at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Builders FirstSource, Inc. wins at 1. 78x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) delivered a total return of +51. 8%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDR returned +614. 8% versus STRR's +50. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Equity Holdings, Inc.
(STRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 13β — meaning WSC is approximately 1010% more volatile than STRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -66. 9% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trex Company, Inc. grew EPS -14. 8% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGRC leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR?
McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus -19. 6% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGRC leads at 25. 9% versus -15. 8% for STRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 78x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for WillScot Holdings Corporation — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR?
In this comparison, STRR (7.
0% yield), MGRC (1. 7% yield), WSC (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TREX, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STRR or MGRC or TREX or WSC or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Equity Holdings, Inc.
(STRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 7. 0% yield). Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRR: +50. 6%, TREX: +248. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STRR and MGRC and TREX and WSC and BLDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (STRR (Healthcare) and MGRC (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials) and WSC (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STRR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MGRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. STRR, MGRC, WSC pay a dividend while TREX, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.