Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs TJX vs ROST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs TJX vs ROST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Financial - Credit Services | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.27B | $753M | $19.40B | $171.46B | $73.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.71B | $565M | $11.56B | $60.37B | $22.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $43M | $610M | $5.49B | $2.15B |
| Gross Margin | 73.7% | 70.0% | 41.9% | 31.1% | 27.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 28.1% | 8.9% | 12.0% | 11.9% |
| Forward P/E | 18.0x | 21.1x | 31.3x | 33.0x | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $673M | $526M | $3.99B | $22.38B | $5.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $10M | $1.23B | $6.23B | $4.59B |
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs TJX vs ROST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Savers Value Villag… (SVV) | 100 | 34.6 | -65.4% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 194.8 | +94.8% |
| The TJX Companies, … (TJX) | 100 | 182.2 | +82.2% |
| Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs TJX vs ROST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SVV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 9.2% revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5%
- Lower P/E (18.0x vs 34.4x)
WRLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 15.9% margin vs SVV's 1.3%
BURL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
TJX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.1%
- 322.5% 10Y total return vs BURL's 440.2%
- PEG 0.25 vs WRLD's 0.59
- Beta 0.39, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.14x
ROST is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 80.5%, current ratio 1.58x
- +58.1% vs SVV's -27.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.2% revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 34.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs SVV's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs BURL's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ROST's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs SVV's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs SVV's 1.1%, ROIC 25.5% vs 7.2% |
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs TJX vs ROST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs TJX vs ROST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WRLD leads in 2 of 6 categories
TJX leads 2 • ROST leads 1 • SVV leads 0 • BURL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WRLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TJX is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.4B annually — 106.9x WRLD's $565M. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SVV's 1.3%. On growth, ROST holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $565M | $11.6B | $60.4B | $22.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $210M | $61M | $1.5B | $8.2B | $3.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $43M | $610M | $5.5B | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $59M | $252M | $232M | $4.9B | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.7% | +70.0% | +41.9% | +31.1% | +27.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +28.1% | +8.9% | +12.0% | +11.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +15.9% | +5.3% | +9.1% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +44.3% | +2.0% | +8.0% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | — | +11.5% | +8.5% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | -107.8% | +20.4% | +28.5% | +11.7% |
Valuation Metrics
WRLD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, WRLD trades at a 84% valuation discount to SVV's 58.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TJX offers better value at 0.24x vs ROST's 0.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $753M | $19.4B | $171.5B | $73.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $1.3B | $22.2B | $187.6B | $74.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.64x | 9.17x | 32.24x | 31.65x | 33.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.99x | 21.15x | 31.34x | 32.98x | 34.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x | — | 0.24x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | 7.53x | 17.49x | 22.27x | 20.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 1.33x | 1.68x | 2.84x | 3.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.07x | 1.87x | 5.05x | 17.05x | 11.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.17x | 3.01x | 113.08x | 35.31x | 33.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX delivers a 53.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $5 for SVV. ROST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TJX's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs TJX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.2% | +10.8% | +29.7% | +53.9% | +36.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +4.0% | +6.5% | +15.4% | +14.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +12.1% | +10.3% | +25.5% | +30.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +16.3% | +12.0% | +33.3% | +25.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.55x | 1.20x | 1.03x | 2.20x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $587M | $516M | $2.8B | $16.2B | $618M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $10M | $1.2B | $6.2B | $4.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $673M | $526M | $4.0B | $22.4B | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 1.13x | 11.36x | 133.22x | 82.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TJX five years ago would be worth $21,851 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,584 for SVV. Over the past 12 months, ROST leads with a +58.1% total return vs SVV's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROST at 29.8% vs SVV's -29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.1% | +5.5% | +2.8% | +0.4% | +23.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.3% | +12.8% | +25.1% | +21.4% | +58.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | +32.8% | +68.1% | +102.9% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | +11.3% | -7.4% | +118.5% | +74.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | +266.2% | +440.2% | +322.5% | +304.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.0% | +9.9% | +18.9% | +26.6% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TJX and ROST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TJX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BURL's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROST currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs SVV's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.27x | 1.30x | 0.39x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.89 | $185.48 | $351.85 | $165.82 | $231.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.91 | $110.00 | $218.52 | $119.84 | $124.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +80.6% | +87.1% | +93.2% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.0 | 53.8 | 44.5 | 43.2 | 62.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 160K | 721K | 4.0M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
TJX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SVV as "Buy", WRLD as "Hold", BURL as "Buy", TJX as "Buy", ROST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.4% upside for SVV (target: $19) vs -4.8% for ROST (target: $214). For income investors, TJX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.06% vs ROST's 0.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | — | $331.88 | $172.00 | $213.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | 35 | 53 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.64 | $1.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +7.2% | +1.4% | +1.5% | +1.5% |
WRLD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TJX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs TJX vs ROST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Savers Value Village, Inc.
(SVV) is the stronger pick with 9. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST?
On trailing P/E, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Savers Value Village, Inc. at 58. 6x. On forward P/E, Savers Value Village, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The TJX Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus World Acceptance Corporation's 0. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST?
Over the past 5 years, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) delivered a total return of +118. 5%, compared to -64. 2% for Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +440. 2% versus SVV's -64. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Burlington Stores, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning BURL is approximately 230% more volatile than TJX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 2% for The TJX Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Savers Value Village, Inc.
(SVV) is pulling ahead at 9. 2% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: World Acceptance Corporation grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -17. 6% for Savers Value Village, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BURL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus 1. 3% for Savers Value Village, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WRLD leads at 28. 1% versus 7. 3% for BURL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SVV leads at 79. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus World Acceptance Corporation's 0. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 4x for Ross Stores, Inc. — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SVV: 131. 4% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST?
In this comparison, TJX (1.
1% yield), ROST (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SVV, WRLD, BURL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SVV or WRLD or BURL or TJX or ROST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 1% yield, +322. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TJX: +322. 5%, SVV: -64. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SVV and WRLD and BURL and TJX and ROST?
These companies operate in different sectors (SVV (Consumer Cyclical) and WRLD (Financial Services) and BURL (Consumer Cyclical) and TJX (Consumer Cyclical) and ROST (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SVV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TJX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ROST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TJX, ROST pay a dividend while SVV, WRLD, BURL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.