Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SW vs SEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
SW vs SEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $21.82B | $6.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $31.23B | $5.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $380M | $506M |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.2x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $13.77B | $4.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $892M | $344M |
SW vs SEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) | 100 | 148.4 | +48.4% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SW vs SEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.35, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
- 64.1% 10Y total return vs SEE's 4.4%
SEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 17.2x)
- 9.4% margin vs SW's 1.2%
- Beta 0.32 vs SW's 1.35
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 17.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs SW's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs SW's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, vs SEE's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.2% vs SW's +8.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs SW's 0.8%, ROIC 11.2% vs 5.4% |
SW vs SEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SW vs SEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SW is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.2B annually — 5.8x SEE's $5.4B. SEE is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SW's 1.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $31.2B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.8B | $965M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $380M | $506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $459M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +29.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.6% | +16.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SW and SEE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 61% valuation discount to SW's 31.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SW's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SEE's 14.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.8B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34.7B | $10.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.30x | 12.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.23x | 12.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.27x | 14.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.37x | 13.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $2 for SW. SW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SW scores 7/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +48.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.9B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $892M | $344M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.8B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.38x | 1.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SW five years ago would be worth $8,188 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,088 for SEE. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs SW's +8.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SW at 17.8% vs SEE's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | +44.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.4% | +2.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.1% | -19.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.1% | +4.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SW's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SW's 79.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.65 | $44.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.73 | $28.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.1% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
SW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SW as "Buy" and SEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for SW (target: $54) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, SW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.50% vs SEE's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.14 | $43.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.46 | $0.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SEE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SW leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SW vs SEE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SW or SEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SW or SEE?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Smurfit Westrock Plc at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, Sealed Air Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SW or SEE?
Over the past 5 years, Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) delivered a total return of -18.
1%, compared to -19. 1% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SW returned +64. 1% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SW or SEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Smurfit Westrock Plc's 1. 35β — meaning SW is approximately 317% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SW or SEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sealed Air Corporation grew EPS 89. 5% year-over-year, compared to 68. 4% for Smurfit Westrock Plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SW leads at 35. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SW or SEE?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus 2. 2% for Smurfit Westrock Plc — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 7. 1% for SW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SW or SEE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) trades at 12.
4x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Smurfit Westrock Plc — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SW: 30. 1% to $54. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — SW or SEE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 9% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE).
09Is SW or SEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, SW: +64. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SW and SEE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SW is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.