Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SY vs MTCH vs YELP vs ANGI vs DOCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
SY vs MTCH vs YELP vs ANGI vs DOCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $198M | $8.34B | $1.69B | $210M | $5.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.43B | $3.52B | $1.47B | $1.02B | $638M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-741M | $663M | $139M | $20M | $239M |
| Gross Margin | 51.6% | 73.8% | 90.0% | 91.1% | 89.7% |
| Operating Margin | -53.2% | 26.6% | 12.4% | 4.8% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.5x | 13.7x | 6.1x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $240M | $3.97B | $42M | $498M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $588M | $1.03B | $216M | $304M | $210M |
SY vs MTCH vs YELP vs ANGI vs DOCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| So-Young Internatio… (SY) | 100 | 31.4 | -68.6% |
| Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) | 100 | 22.2 | -77.8% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| Angi Inc. (ANGI) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SY vs MTCH vs YELP vs ANGI vs DOCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +266.1% vs ANGI's -65.4%
MTCH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 2.0%
- 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SY's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
YELP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs MTCH's 195.5%
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.82 vs SY's 2.05, lower leverage
ANGI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.7x)
DOCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 54.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.97x
- PEG 0.21 vs MTCH's 0.46
- 20.0% revenue growth vs ANGI's -13.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs ANGI's -13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs SY's -51.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SY's 2.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SY's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +266.1% vs ANGI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs SY's -28.0%, ROIC 20.0% vs -24.1% |
SY vs MTCH vs YELP vs ANGI vs DOCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SY vs MTCH vs YELP vs ANGI vs DOCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
MTCH leads 2 • ANGI leads 1 • SY leads 0 • YELP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 5.5x DOCS's $638M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SY's -51.8%. On growth, DOCS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $3.5B | $1.5B | $1.0B | $638M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$751M | $1.0B | $236M | $86M | $250M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$741M | $663M | $139M | $20M | $239M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $1.0B | $281M | $26M | $314M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +73.8% | +90.0% | +91.1% | +89.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | +26.6% | +12.4% | +4.8% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -51.8% | +18.8% | +9.5% | +1.9% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +29.0% | +19.1% | +2.5% | +49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +3.9% | +0.8% | -3.2% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.3% | +45.5% | -16.7% | -163.3% | -16.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ANGI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ANGI trades at a 76% valuation discount to DOCS's 23.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.30x vs MTCH's 0.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $198M | $8.3B | $1.7B | $210M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $147M | $11.3B | $1.5B | $404M | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.68x | 15.05x | 12.71x | 5.57x | 23.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.49x | 13.74x | 6.10x | 16.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x | — | — | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.53x | 6.18x | 3.22x | 21.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 2.39x | 1.15x | 0.20x | 9.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | — | 2.61x | 0.26x | 4.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.14x | 5.23x | 4.62x | 19.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-41 for SY. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANGI's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs SY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.4% | — | +19.7% | +2.1% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.0% | +15.3% | +14.1% | +1.2% | +20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.1% | +23.7% | +25.1% | +5.0% | +20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.1% | +23.7% | +22.9% | +5.1% | +22.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | — | 0.06x | 0.54x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$348M | $2.9B | -$174M | $194M | -$197M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $588M | $1.0B | $216M | $304M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $240M | $4.0B | $42M | $498M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.17x | — | 5.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YELP five years ago would be worth $7,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $386 for ANGI. Over the past 12 months, SY leads with a +266.1% total return vs ANGI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTCH at 4.4% vs ANGI's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.1% | +14.1% | -5.7% | -58.6% | -39.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +266.1% | +20.5% | -19.9% | -65.4% | -55.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | +13.9% | +1.6% | -79.5% | -24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.7% | -74.7% | -27.9% | -96.1% | -50.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.9% | +195.5% | +10.2% | -94.1% | -50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.6% | +4.4% | +0.5% | -41.1% | -8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MTCH and YELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SY's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTCH currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs ANGI's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 1.04x | 0.82x | 1.85x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.28 | $39.20 | $41.22 | $19.42 | $76.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $26.80 | $19.60 | $4.53 | $20.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.1% | +91.4% | +69.1% | +27.0% | +34.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 68.8 | 57.2 | 26.1 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 457K | 4.4M | 1.1M | 1.2M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
MTCH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SY as "Buy", MTCH as "Buy", YELP as "Hold", ANGI as "Hold", DOCS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.3% upside for ANGI (target: $13) vs -73.5% for SY (target: $1). For income investors, MTCH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.98% vs SY's 1.58%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $0.80 | $36.00 | $28.33 | $12.75 | $42.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 32 | 67 | 54 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +2.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.71 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +9.5% | +17.3% | +70.7% | +2.3% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MTCH leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SY vs MTCH vs YELP vs ANGI vs DOCS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate So-Young International Inc. (SY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS?
On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Doximity, Inc. at 23. 5x. On forward P/E, Angi Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Match Group, Inc. 's 0. 46x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS?
Over the past 5 years, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) delivered a total return of -27. 9%, compared to -96. 1% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTCH returned +195. 5% versus ANGI's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus So-Young International Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning SY is approximately 151% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 54% for Angi Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -13. 0% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Doximity, Inc. grew EPS 54. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 4% for So-Young International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOCS leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -40. 2% for So-Young International Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -42. 6% for SY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Match Group, Inc. 's 0. 46x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Angi Inc. (ANGI) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Doximity, Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 143. 3% to $12. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS?
In this comparison, MTCH (2.
0% yield), SY (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. YELP, ANGI, DOCS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SY or MTCH or YELP or ANGI or DOCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), 2. 0% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Angi Inc. (ANGI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTCH: +195. 5%, ANGI: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SY and MTCH and YELP and ANGI and DOCS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SY (Healthcare) and MTCH (Communication Services) and YELP (Communication Services) and ANGI (Communication Services) and DOCS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTCH is a small-cap deep-value stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock. SY, MTCH pay a dividend while YELP, ANGI, DOCS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 11%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.