Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYBX vs IMVT vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ARDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Biotechnology
SYBX vs IMVT vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ARDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $5.53B | $3.92B | $2.47B | $1.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $901M | $959M | $428M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-464M | $94M | $-51M | $-58M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 44.4% | 11.3% | 91.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 12.1% | -3.8% | -8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 29.7x | 62.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $98K | $303M | $186M | $212M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $714M | $766M | $98M | $68M |
SYBX vs IMVT vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ARDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synlogic, Inc. (SYBX) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 297.0 | +197.0% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 313.1 | +213.1% |
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 381.4 | +281.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYBX vs IMVT vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ARDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYBX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.24, yield 0.2%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs ARDX's 263.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 10.4% margin vs ARDX's -13.6%
ICHR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +329.1% vs SYBX's -46.4%
ARDX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 4.31x
- 22.1% revenue growth vs SYBX's -100.0%
- Beta 0.87 vs ICHR's 3.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs SYBX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs ARDX's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs ICHR's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +329.1% vs SYBX's -46.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
SYBX vs IMVT vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ARDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SYBX vs IMVT vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ARDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICHR leads 1 • SYBX leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • ARDX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ACMR and ARDX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICHR and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $959M and $0 in trailing revenue. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARDX's -13.6%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $901M | $959M | $428M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$487M | $126M | -$11M | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$464M | $94M | -$51M | -$58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$423M | -$69M | -$17M | -$37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +44.4% | +11.3% | +91.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +12.1% | -3.8% | -8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +10.4% | -5.3% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -7.6% | -1.7% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +9.4% | +4.7% | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +19.7% | -76.1% | +46.2% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ICHR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $5.5B | $3.9B | $2.5B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8M | $4.8B | $3.5B | $2.6B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.50x | -9.97x | 43.21x | -46.25x | -26.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 29.68x | 62.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 27.49x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 4.35x | 2.61x | 4.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 5.83x | 2.06x | 3.67x | 10.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARDX's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICHR scores 3/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.4% | -47.1% | +6.1% | -7.5% | -38.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.0% | -44.1% | +3.9% | -5.2% | -11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | +7.0% | -3.9% | -10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.6% | -66.1% | +6.6% | -4.7% | -10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 0.16x | 0.28x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$714M | -$463M | $87M | $144M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $714M | $766M | $98M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $98,000 | $303M | $186M | $212M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 20.44x | -5.97x | -0.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARDX five years ago would be worth $41,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $127 for SYBX. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs SYBX's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs SYBX's -58.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.7% | +5.1% | +31.9% | +249.0% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.4% | +96.1% | +195.6% | +329.1% | +88.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.9% | +40.9% | +487.9% | +151.1% | +66.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +62.4% | +133.4% | +28.9% | +313.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +173.6% | +3065.8% | +629.1% | +263.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.5% | +12.1% | +80.5% | +35.9% | +18.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICHR and ARDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARDX is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs SYBX's 30.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 1.37x | 3.24x | 3.93x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.96 | $30.09 | $71.65 | $72.87 | $8.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $13.36 | $19.26 | $13.12 | $3.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.6% | +90.5% | +82.6% | +97.7% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 60.2 | 60.7 | 66.9 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 1.4M | 1.2M | 795K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMVT as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.6% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $45.50 | $40.00 | $49.80 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 10 | 14 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.11 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACMR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ICHR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SYBX vs IMVT vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ARDX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Synlogic, Inc. (SYBX). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX?
On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX?
Over the past 5 years, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) delivered a total return of +313. 0%, compared to -98. 7% for Synlogic, Inc. (SYBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus SYBX's -98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 354% more volatile than ARDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 127% for Ardelyx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -100. 0% for Synlogic, Inc. (SYBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Synlogic, Inc. grew EPS 95. 8% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -15. 1% for Ardelyx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -10. 1% for ARDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARDX leads at 89. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 32. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARDX: 143. 6% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX?
In this comparison, ACMR (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SYBX, IMVT, ICHR, ARDX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYBX or IMVT or ACMR or ICHR or ARDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), +263. 5% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARDX: +263. 5%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYBX and IMVT and ACMR and ICHR and ARDX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SYBX (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and ARDX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SYBX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.