Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYY vs SFM vs KR vs UNFI vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Grocery Stores
Food Distribution
Specialty Retail
SYY vs SFM vs KR vs UNFI vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Food Distribution | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $34.91B | $7.62B | $42.03B | $3.20B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83.57B | $8.90B | $147.64B | $31.54B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $507M | $1.02B | $-78M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 18.5% | 37.0% | 22.3% | 13.3% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 7.6% | 1.3% | 0.3% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 14.5x | 12.7x | 19.5x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $14.49B | $1.94B | $24.68B | $3.45B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.07B | $257M | $3.33B | $44M | $10.73B |
SYY vs SFM vs KR vs UNFI vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 322.3 | +222.3% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| United Natural Food… (UNFI) | 100 | 255.2 | +155.2% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYY vs SFM vs KR vs UNFI vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.06
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs KR's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
SFM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 41.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 14.1% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4%
- 5.7% margin vs UNFI's -0.2%
- 12.5% ROA vs UNFI's -1.0%, ROIC 17.8% vs -0.5%
KR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 44.7x)
UNFI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +88.7% vs SFM's -51.7%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs SFM's 203.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs UNFI's 0.97, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs UNFI's -0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs UNFI's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs KR's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.7% vs SFM's -51.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs UNFI's -1.0%, ROIC 17.8% vs -0.5% |
SYY vs SFM vs KR vs UNFI vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SYY vs SFM vs KR vs UNFI vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFM leads in 2 of 6 categories
UNFI leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • SYY leads 1 • KR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 79.0x SFM's $8.9B. SFM is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UNFI's -0.2%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $83.6B | $8.9B | $147.6B | $31.5B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.0B | $996M | $5.5B | $417M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $507M | $1.0B | -$78M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $361M | $3.5B | $395M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +37.0% | +22.3% | +13.3% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +7.6% | +1.3% | +0.3% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +5.7% | +0.7% | -0.2% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +4.1% | +2.4% | +1.3% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +4.1% | +1.2% | -2.6% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.4% | -5.5% | +50.0% | +7.4% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UNFI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, SFM trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34.9B | $7.6B | $42.0B | $3.2B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48.3B | $9.3B | $63.4B | $6.6B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.54x | 15.25x | 43.12x | -25.52x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.88x | 14.52x | 12.68x | 19.53x | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | 0.90x | — | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.58x | 9.35x | 10.91x | 22.79x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 0.86x | 0.28x | 0.10x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.23x | 5.70x | 7.33x | 1.94x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.60x | 16.29x | 12.55x | 13.39x | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-5 for UNFI. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs UNFI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +80.7% | +36.1% | +13.0% | -5.0% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +12.5% | +2.0% | -1.0% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.7% | +17.8% | +5.0% | -0.5% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.0% | +22.1% | +5.5% | -0.6% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.81x | 1.39x | 4.16x | 2.22x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.4B | $1.7B | $21.3B | $3.4B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $257M | $3.3B | $44M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.5B | $1.9B | $24.7B | $3.5B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.35x | 254.65x | 2.59x | 0.47x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $31,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,614 for SYY. Over the past 12 months, UNFI leads with a +88.7% total return vs SFM's -51.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs SYY's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +0.4% | +6.0% | +49.7% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.4% | -51.7% | -6.4% | +88.7% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.0% | +125.7% | +42.7% | +86.0% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.9% | +213.8% | +90.7% | +36.4% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.2% | +203.9% | +108.7% | +43.1% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.3% | +31.2% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KR and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UNFI's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SFM's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.17x | -0.64x | 0.97x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.69 | $182.00 | $76.58 | $52.68 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $68.19 | $64.75 | $58.60 | $20.78 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.5% | +44.5% | +86.7% | +95.0% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.7 | 54.9 | 39.2 | 70.5 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 2.2M | 5.6M | 696K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYY as "Buy", SFM as "Buy", KR as "Buy", UNFI as "Hold", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs -20.7% for UNFI (target: $40). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.44 | $91.00 | $74.75 | $39.67 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 43 | 44 | 43 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | +2.0% | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 37 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | — | $1.35 | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +6.2% | +6.4% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
SFM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UNFI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SYY vs SFM vs KR vs UNFI vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sysco Corporation (SYY) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -3. 9% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus UNFI's +43. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus United Natural Foods, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning UNFI is approximately -251% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFM leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT?
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -0. 4% for United Natural Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFM leads at 7. 8% versus -0. 1% for UNFI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co. (KR) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 32. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 1% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), KR (2. 0% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SFM, UNFI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYY or SFM or KR or UNFI or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, UNFI: +43. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYY and SFM and KR and UNFI and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; UNFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. SYY, KR, WMT pay a dividend while SFM, UNFI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.