Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $21M | $10.65B | $10.57B | $2.27B | $729M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $2.69B | $2.69B | $6.28B | $717M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-148M | $61M | $61M | $835M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 73.3% | 73.3% | 73.3% | 74.4% | 97.5% |
| Operating Margin | -227.6% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 3.8% | 11.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.8x | 19.7x | 13.7x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $536M | $536M | $0.00 | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $773M | $773M | $2.25B | $95M |
TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Token Cat Limited (TC) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) | 100 | 76.0 | -24.0% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 75.3 | -24.7% |
| Autohome Inc. (ATHM) | 100 | 25.1 | -74.9% |
| EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.71
- Beta 0.71 vs ZG's 1.32
ZG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Z is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 64.9% 10Y total return vs ZG's 61.3%
ATHM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 6.00x
- Beta 0.81, yield 9.5%, current ratio 6.00x
- 9.5% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
EVER carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.5%, EPS growth 198.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- 38.5% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 13.7x)
- 15.3% margin vs TC's -403.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.5% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs TC's -403.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs ZG's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 9.5% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.0% vs Z's -35.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 38.3% ROA vs TC's -72.7% |
TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EVER leads in 4 of 6 categories
TC leads 0 • ZG leads 0 • Z leads 0 • ATHM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVER leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATHM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 171.3x TC's $37M. EVER is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TC's -4.0%. On growth, ATHM holds the edge at +152.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $2.7B | $2.7B | $6.3B | $717M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $227M | $221M | $322M | $85M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$148M | $61M | $61M | $835M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$193M | $333M | $433M | $771M | $99M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.3% | +73.3% | +73.3% | +74.4% | +97.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +0.4% | +0.4% | +3.8% | +11.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +2.3% | +2.3% | +13.3% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +12.4% | +16.1% | +12.3% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.8% | +18.4% | +18.4% | +152.2% | +14.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.6% | +5.1% | +5.1% | +2.1% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
EVER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.9x trailing earnings, ATHM trades at a 99% valuation discount to ZG's 486.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EVER's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZG's 39.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $10.7B | $10.6B | $2.3B | $729M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $10.4B | $10.3B | $1.9B | $636M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.00x | 486.63x | 482.65x | 2.89x | 7.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.80x | 19.71x | 13.74x | 10.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.27x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 39.91x | 39.58x | 18.03x | 9.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.90x | 4.12x | 4.09x | 2.46x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.29x | 2.27x | 0.64x | 3.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.34x | 44.97x | 20.03x | 8.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVER leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVER delivers a 53.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TC. EVER carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to Z's 0.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZG scores 7/9 vs TC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.5% | +1.3% | +1.3% | +3.3% | +53.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -72.7% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +2.9% | +38.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.5% | -0.5% | +1.8% | +54.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -0.6% | -0.6% | +2.2% | +35.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.11x | 0.11x | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42M | -$237M | -$237M | -$2.3B | -$93M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $773M | $773M | $2.3B | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $536M | $536M | $0 | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -60.86x | 5.22x | 5.22x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EVER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EVER five years ago would be worth $6,458 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $102 for TC. Over the past 12 months, EVER leads with a -10.0% total return vs Z's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVER at 45.8% vs TC's -62.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | -32.9% | -33.7% | -14.7% | -19.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.2% | -33.7% | -35.7% | -17.6% | -10.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -7.0% | -9.5% | -19.0% | +209.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -63.1% | -63.2% | -73.0% | -35.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +61.3% | +64.9% | +0.1% | +16.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.8% | -2.4% | -3.3% | -6.8% | +45.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TC and EVER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TC is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZG's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVER currently trades 71.7% from its 52-week high vs TC's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.32x | 1.32x | 0.81x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.46 | $90.22 | $93.88 | $29.92 | $28.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.50 | $39.14 | $39.05 | $16.74 | $13.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.5% | +48.8% | +46.5% | +64.6% | +71.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.2 | 51.8 | 51.1 | 63.7 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 1.0M | 3.6M | 764K | 952K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TC as "Hold", ZG as "Buy", Z as "Hold", ATHM as "Buy", EVER as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.8% upside for ATHM (target: $44) vs 10.4% for EVER (target: $23). ATHM is the only dividend payer here at 9.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $70.67 | $80.00 | $43.67 | $22.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 49 | 46 | 22 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $12.55 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.3% | +6.3% | +6.8% | +2.9% |
EVER leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) is the stronger pick with 38. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Autohome Inc. (ATHM) offers the better valuation at 2. 9x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?
On trailing P/E, Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the cheapest at 2. 9x versus Zillow Group, Inc. Class A at 486. 6x. On forward P/E, EverQuote, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?
Over the past 5 years, EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) delivered a total return of -35. 4%, compared to -99. 0% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: Z returned +64. 9% versus TC's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Token Cat Limited (TC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's 1. 32β — meaning ZG is approximately 85% more volatile than TC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 11% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) is pulling ahead at 38. 5% versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Autohome Inc. grew EPS 242. 6% year-over-year, compared to -125. 0% for Token Cat Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVER leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?
Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus -382. 3% for Token Cat Limited — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVER leads at 9. 6% versus -182. 9% for TC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVER leads at 97. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for Zillow Group, Inc. Class A — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATHM: 125. 8% to $43. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?
In this comparison, ATHM (9.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TC, ZG, Z, EVER do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Autohome Inc.
(ATHM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 9. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHM: +0. 1%, ZG: +61. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TC and ZG and Z and ATHM and EVER?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; Z is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ATHM is a small-cap deep-value stock; EVER is a small-cap high-growth stock. ATHM pays a dividend while TC, ZG, Z, EVER do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.