Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TC
Token Cat Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-99.4%
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.65B
5Y Perf.-24.0%
Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.57B
5Y Perf.-24.7%
ATHM
Autohome Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • CN
Market Cap$2.27B
5Y Perf.-74.9%
EVER
EverQuote, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$729M
5Y Perf.-61.8%

TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TC logoTC
ZG logoZG
Z logoZ
ATHM logoATHM
EVER logoEVER
IndustryInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$21M$10.65B$10.57B$2.27B$729M
Revenue (TTM)$37M$2.69B$2.69B$6.28B$717M
Net Income (TTM)$-148M$61M$61M$835M$110M
Gross Margin73.3%73.3%73.3%74.4%97.5%
Operating Margin-227.6%0.4%0.4%3.8%11.4%
Forward P/E19.8x19.7x13.7x10.4x
Total Debt$48M$536M$536M$0.00$3M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$773M$773M$2.25B$95M

TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVERLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TC
ZG
Z
ATHM
EVER
StockMay 20May 26Return
Token Cat Limited (TC)1000.6-99.4%
Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG)10076.0-24.0%
Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z)10075.3-24.7%
Autohome Inc. (ATHM)10025.1-74.9%
EverQuote, Inc. (EVER)10038.2-61.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EVER leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Token Cat Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. ATHM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TC
Token Cat Limited
The Income Pick

TC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 0.71
  • Beta 0.71 vs ZG's 1.32
Best for: income & stability
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A
The Quality Angle

ZG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C
The Long-Run Compounder

Z is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 64.9% 10Y total return vs ZG's 61.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
ATHM
Autohome Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ATHM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 6.00x
  • Beta 0.81, yield 9.5%, current ratio 6.00x
  • 9.5% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
EVER
EverQuote, Inc.
The Growth Play

EVER carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 38.5%, EPS growth 198.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
  • 38.5% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7%
  • Lower P/E (10.4x vs 13.7x)
  • 15.3% margin vs TC's -403.8%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEVER logoEVER38.5% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7%
ValueEVER logoEVERLower P/E (10.4x vs 13.7x)
Quality / MarginsEVER logoEVER15.3% margin vs TC's -403.8%
Stability / SafetyTC logoTCBeta 0.71 vs ZG's 1.32
DividendsATHM logoATHM9.5% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EVER logoEVER-10.0% vs Z's -35.7%
Efficiency (ROA)EVER logoEVER38.3% ROA vs TC's -72.7%

TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TCToken Cat Limited
FY 2024
Others Member
100.0%$3M
ZGZillow Group, Inc. Class A
FY 2025
Sales Revenue
44.9%$1.9B
Residential Revenue
40.2%$1.7B
Rental Revenue
14.9%$630M
ZZillow Group, Inc. Class C
FY 2025
Sales Revenue
44.9%$1.9B
Residential Revenue
40.2%$1.7B
Rental Revenue
14.9%$630M
ATHMAutohome Inc.
FY 2025
Leads Generation Services
42.0%$2.7B
Online Marketplace And Other Service
40.1%$2.6B
Media Services
17.9%$1.2B
EVEREverQuote, Inc.
FY 2025
Automotive
100.0%$630M
Other
0.0%$40,000

TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEVERLAGGINGATHM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EVER leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ATHM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 171.3x TC's $37M. EVER is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TC's -4.0%. On growth, ATHM holds the edge at +152.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…ATHM logoATHMAutohome Inc.EVER logoEVEREverQuote, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$37M$2.7B$2.7B$6.3B$717M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M$227M$221M$322M$85M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$148M$61M$61M$835M$110M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$193M$333M$433M$771M$99M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.3%+73.3%+73.3%+74.4%+97.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.3%+0.4%+0.4%+3.8%+11.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.0%+2.3%+2.3%+13.3%+15.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.3%+12.4%+16.1%+12.3%+13.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-38.8%+18.4%+18.4%+152.2%+14.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.6%+5.1%+5.1%+2.1%+142.9%
EVER leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EVER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.9x trailing earnings, ATHM trades at a 99% valuation discount to ZG's 486.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EVER's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZG's 39.9x.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…ATHM logoATHMAutohome Inc.EVER logoEVEREverQuote, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$21M$10.7B$10.6B$2.3B$729M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$27M$10.4B$10.3B$1.9B$636M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.00x486.63x482.65x2.89x7.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.80x19.71x13.74x10.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple39.91x39.58x18.03x9.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.90x4.12x4.09x2.46x1.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.29x2.27x0.64x3.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF45.34x44.97x20.03x8.07x
EVER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EVER leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

EVER delivers a 53.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TC. EVER carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to Z's 0.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZG scores 7/9 vs TC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…ATHM logoATHMAutohome Inc.EVER logoEVEREverQuote, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.5%+1.3%+1.3%+3.3%+53.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-72.7%+1.1%+1.1%+2.9%+38.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.5%-0.5%+1.8%+54.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.6%-0.6%+2.2%+35.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927746
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.11x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$42M-$237M-$237M-$2.3B-$93M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$773M$773M$2.3B$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$48M$536M$536M$0$3M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-60.86x5.22x5.22x
EVER leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EVER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EVER five years ago would be worth $6,458 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $102 for TC. Over the past 12 months, EVER leads with a -10.0% total return vs Z's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVER at 45.8% vs TC's -62.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…ATHM logoATHMAutohome Inc.EVER logoEVEREverQuote, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.3%-32.9%-33.7%-14.7%-19.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-16.2%-33.7%-35.7%-17.6%-10.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.9%-7.0%-9.5%-19.0%+209.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%-63.1%-63.2%-73.0%-35.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+61.3%+64.9%+0.1%+16.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-62.8%-2.4%-3.3%-6.8%+45.8%
EVER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TC and EVER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TC is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZG's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVER currently trades 71.7% from its 52-week high vs TC's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…ATHM logoATHMAutohome Inc.EVER logoEVEREverQuote, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x1.32x1.32x0.81x1.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.46$90.22$93.88$29.92$28.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.50$39.14$39.05$16.74$13.88
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+42.5%+48.8%+46.5%+64.6%+71.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.251.851.163.762.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2K1.0M3.6M764K952K
Evenly matched — TC and EVER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: TC as "Hold", ZG as "Buy", Z as "Hold", ATHM as "Buy", EVER as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.8% upside for ATHM (target: $44) vs 10.4% for EVER (target: $23). ATHM is the only dividend payer here at 9.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…ATHM logoATHMAutohome Inc.EVER logoEVEREverQuote, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$70.67$80.00$43.67$22.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts1849462213
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+9.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$12.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.3%+6.3%+6.8%+2.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

EVER leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallEverQuote, Inc. (EVER)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TC vs ZG vs Z vs ATHM vs EVER: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER a better buy right now?

For growth investors, EverQuote, Inc.

(EVER) is the stronger pick with 38. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Autohome Inc. (ATHM) offers the better valuation at 2. 9x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?

On trailing P/E, Autohome Inc.

(ATHM) is the cheapest at 2. 9x versus Zillow Group, Inc. Class A at 486. 6x. On forward P/E, EverQuote, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?

Over the past 5 years, EverQuote, Inc.

(EVER) delivered a total return of -35. 4%, compared to -99. 0% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: Z returned +64. 9% versus TC's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Token Cat Limited (TC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

71β versus Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's 1. 32β — meaning ZG is approximately 85% more volatile than TC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 11% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), EverQuote, Inc.

(EVER) is pulling ahead at 38. 5% versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Autohome Inc. grew EPS 242. 6% year-over-year, compared to -125. 0% for Token Cat Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVER leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?

Autohome Inc.

(ATHM) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus -382. 3% for Token Cat Limited — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVER leads at 9. 6% versus -182. 9% for TC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVER leads at 97. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, EverQuote, Inc.

(EVER) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for Zillow Group, Inc. Class A — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATHM: 125. 8% to $43. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER?

In this comparison, ATHM (9.

5% yield) pays a dividend. TC, ZG, Z, EVER do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TC or ZG or Z or ATHM or EVER better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Autohome Inc.

(ATHM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 9. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHM: +0. 1%, ZG: +61. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TC and ZG and Z and ATHM and EVER?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; Z is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ATHM is a small-cap deep-value stock; EVER is a small-cap high-growth stock. ATHM pays a dividend while TC, ZG, Z, EVER do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 43%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

Z

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATHM

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 76%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EVER

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TC and ZG and Z and ATHM and EVER on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TC: -38.8% · ZG: 18.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.