Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TCBK vs FFIN vs CVBF vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TCBK vs FFIN vs CVBF vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $4.61B | $2.78B | $10.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $533M | $739M | $643M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $122M | $243M | $209M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 70.8% | 79.9% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 31.7% | 36.8% | 43.8% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.0x | 15.9x | 14.2x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $80M | $197M | $991M | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $763M | $108M | $1.43B |
TCBK vs FFIN vs CVBF vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCBK vs FFIN vs CVBF vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 0.02x
- PEG 1.05 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Beta 0.93, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.02x
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.0%
CVBF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs TCBK's 129.4%
- +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.05 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBK's 0.4% |
TCBK vs FFIN vs CVBF vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TCBK vs FFIN vs CVBF vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TCBK leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 6.3x TCBK's $533M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $533M | $739M | $643M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $183M | $310M | $294M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $122M | $243M | $209M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $290M | $217M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +70.8% | +79.9% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +36.8% | +43.8% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +30.2% | +32.5% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +39.6% | +33.8% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.0% | -7.7% | +11.1% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TCBK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 35% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TCBK offers better value at 1.20x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $4.6B | $2.8B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $4.0B | $3.7B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.70x | 20.76x | 13.49x | 16.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.05x | 15.92x | 14.24x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.20x | 3.98x | 4.25x | 5.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.52x | 14.17x | 13.02x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.06x | 6.23x | 4.33x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 2.89x | 1.21x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.77x | 15.73x | 12.81x | 7.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. TCBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCBK scores 8/9 vs BOKF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +13.3% | +9.3% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.6% | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +11.0% | +6.8% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +16.0% | +9.3% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.12x | 0.43x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$77M | -$566M | $883M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $763M | $108M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80M | $197M | $991M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | 1.48x | 2.12x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | +8.5% | +10.9% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.5% | -3.2% | +13.1% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.3% | +29.1% | +94.0% | +79.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | -28.2% | +12.2% | +59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.4% | +145.4% | +67.6% | +168.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.3% | +8.9% | +24.7% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TCBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TCBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TCBK currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.95x | 0.94x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.18 | $38.74 | $21.48 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.32 | $28.11 | $17.95 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +83.6% | +95.5% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 58.2 | 57.9 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 740K | 1.6M | 317K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and CVBF and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TCBK as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.33 | $39.25 | $24.75 | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 15 | 16 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.2% | +4.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 11 | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.38 | $0.72 | $0.82 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% | +0.9% |
TCBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
TCBK vs FFIN vs CVBF vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, TriCo Bancshares is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TriCo Bancshares wins at 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +168. 5% versus CVBF's +67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
93β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 11% more volatile than TCBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is TCBK or FFIN or CVBF or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
93), 2. 7% yield, +129. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TCBK: +129. 4%, BOKF: +168. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TCBK and FFIN and CVBF and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TCBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.