Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TCI vs NXRT vs ELME vs BRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Office
REIT - Residential
TCI vs NXRT vs ELME vs BRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Residential | REIT - Office | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $317M | $756M | $188M | $277M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $252M | $0.00 | $98M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-32M | $-154M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | -38.7% | 91.1% | — | 12.6% |
| Operating Margin | -11.6% | 11.5% | — | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $211M | $1.56B | $520M | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $14M | $1.33B | $25M |
TCI vs NXRT vs ELME vs BRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcontinental Re… (TCI) | 100 | 181.4 | +81.4% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) | 100 | 130.5 | +30.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCI vs NXRT vs ELME vs BRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 135.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- 324.2% 10Y total return vs BRT's 217.9%
- 9.6% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
- 18.9% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ELME's 34.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ELME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 34.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47, yield 34.1%, current ratio 1.02x
- Better valuation composite
BRT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.9% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs TCI's 0.75 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ELME's 34.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.5% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.8% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC -0.5% vs -15.3% |
TCI vs NXRT vs ELME vs BRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TCI vs NXRT vs ELME vs BRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
TCI leads 2 • ELME leads 0 • BRT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $252M and $0 in trailing revenue. TCI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, BRT holds the edge at +4.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $252M | $0 | $98M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $125M | -$44M | $33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$32M | -$154M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | $79M | $62M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -38.7% | +91.1% | — | +12.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | +11.5% | — | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | -12.7% | — | -12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -104.2% | +31.2% | — | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +0.5% | -4.0% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.2% | 0.0% | -6.6% | -16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NXRT's 18.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TCI's 82.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $756M | $188M | $277M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $513M | $2.3B | -$624M | $760M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.91x | -23.65x | -1.21x | -22.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 82.37x | 18.60x | — | 20.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.45x | 3.01x | — | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 2.52x | 0.78x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.05x | 3.03x | 25.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TCI delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. TCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCI scores 5/9 vs BRT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | -10.1% | -18.9% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -1.7% | -8.3% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +1.1% | -15.3% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +1.5% | -10.1% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 5.18x | 2.18x | 2.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $197M | $1.5B | -$812M | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $14M | $1.3B | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $211M | $1.6B | $520M | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.22x | 0.47x | -3.82x | 0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCI five years ago would be worth $17,280 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,705 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, TCI leads with a +18.5% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELME at 4.2% vs NXRT's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.8% | +2.6% | -4.2% | +3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | -15.2% | +8.1% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | -15.5% | +13.3% | +1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.8% | -23.0% | -15.3% | +7.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +324.2% | +211.1% | -11.6% | +217.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | -5.5% | +4.2% | +0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ELME and BRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELME is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCI's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRT currently trades 88.2% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.62x | 0.47x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.65 | $38.30 | $17.68 | $16.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.26 | $23.79 | $1.98 | $13.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.4% | +77.8% | +12.0% | +88.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 71.0 | 50.6 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 216K | 1.2M | 54K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", ELME as "Hold", BRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 796.2% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.11% vs NXRT's 7.07%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $19.00 | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | +34.1% | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.11 | $0.72 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TCI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
TCI vs NXRT vs ELME vs BRT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCI or NXRT or ELME or BRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TCI or NXRT or ELME or BRT?
Over the past 5 years, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) delivered a total return of +72. 8%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCI returned +324. 2% versus ELME's -11. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TCI or NXRT or ELME or BRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elme Communities (ELME) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. 's 0. 75β — meaning TCI is approximately 60% more volatile than ELME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TCI or NXRT or ELME or BRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. grew EPS 135. 3% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TCI leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TCI or NXRT or ELME or BRT?
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRT leads at 11. 4% versus -12. 9% for TCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TCI or NXRT or ELME or BRT?
In this comparison, ELME (34.
1% yield), BRT (7. 1% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is TCI or NXRT or ELME or BRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 7. 1% yield, +211. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXRT: +211. 1%, TCI: +324. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TCI and NXRT and ELME and BRT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NXRT, ELME, BRT pay a dividend while TCI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.