Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TDIC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Entertainment
TDIC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $141M | $371.02B | $182.19B | $90.88B | $68.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $125.28B | $37.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $18.60B | $-2.15B |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 61.7% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 15.3% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 171.9x | 24.5x | 15.5x | 7.1x | 94.0x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $110.44B | $32.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $9.48B | $4.57B |
TDIC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 208.6 | +108.6% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 89.4 | -10.6% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 63.0 | -37.0% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 125.3 | +25.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TDIC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 124.1% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs DIS's 13.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
- 19.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.5%
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth 151.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 5.4%
- PEG 0.38 vs NFLX's 0.74
- Beta 0.17, yield 5.4%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.1x vs 94.0x)
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +196.8% vs CMCSA's -24.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 124.1% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.1x vs 94.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs TDIC's 2.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +196.8% vs CMCSA's -24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.5% |
TDIC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TDIC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 2 • TDIC leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 2735.0x TDIC's $46M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $125.3B | $37.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $30.1B | $20.5B | $35.4B | $10.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $11.0B | $11.2B | $18.6B | -$2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $9.5B | $7.1B | $18.1B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +61.7% | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +15.3% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +24.3% | +11.5% | +14.8% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -55.2% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +14.5% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.6% | +6.5% | +5.3% | -0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.1% | -29.8% | -32.6% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 97% valuation discount to TDIC's 171.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.25x vs NFLX's 1.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $141M | $371.0B | $182.2B | $90.9B | $68.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $141M | $376.4B | $221.4B | $191.8B | $96.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 171.87x | 34.61x | 15.32x | 4.63x | 93.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.54x | 15.52x | 7.07x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.05x | — | 0.25x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 291.11x | 12.51x | 11.56x | 5.20x | 13.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.10x | 8.21x | 1.93x | 0.73x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 125.34x | 14.20x | 1.66x | 0.93x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.22x | 18.08x | 4.15x | 22.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TDIC delivers a 112.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TDIC's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs TDIC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +112.5% | +41.3% | +9.8% | +19.5% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.9% | +19.8% | +5.6% | +6.9% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +29.8% | +6.9% | +8.2% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +8.9% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 1.13x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $5.4B | $39.2B | $101.0B | $28.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $9.5B | $4.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $110.4B | $32.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.46x | 17.33x | 9.95x | 6.84x | 2.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,324 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +196.8% total return vs CMCSA's -24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 37.6% vs CMCSA's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2182.2% | -3.8% | -6.2% | -13.3% | -4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.3% | -23.1% | -4.7% | -24.5% | +196.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.3% | +160.7% | +15.7% | -28.9% | +112.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.3% | +79.9% | -39.8% | -46.8% | -22.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.3% | +896.1% | +13.4% | +10.4% | -2.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | +37.6% | +5.0% | -10.8% | +28.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMCSA and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TDIC's 2.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs TDIC's 58.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.60x | 0.35x | 0.91x | 0.17x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.50 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $36.66 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.18 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $24.53 | $8.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.4% | +65.3% | +84.1% | +68.0% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.2 | 38.0 | 56.9 | 30.3 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.5M | 38.3M | 8.6M | 28.9M | 20.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", WBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.0% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 10.3% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.40% vs DIS's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $115.59 | $138.44 | $31.35 | $30.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 63 | 60 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | +5.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 18 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | $1.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% | +1.9% | +7.9% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TDIC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is the stronger pick with 124.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
6x versus Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares at 171. 9x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 38x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +79. 9%, compared to -46. 8% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +896. 1% versus WBD's -2. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
17β versus Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's 2. 60β — meaning TDIC is approximately 1387% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 162% for Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is pulling ahead at 124.
1% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -8. 7% for Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 1. 7% for TDIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 32. 0% to $115. 59.
08Which pays a better dividend — TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
4% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TDIC, NFLX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TDIC or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
17), 5. 4% yield). Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) carries a higher beta of 2. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +10. 4%, TDIC: +5. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TDIC and NFLX and DIS and CMCSA and WBD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TDIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DIS, CMCSA pay a dividend while TDIC, NFLX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.