Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TDUP vs AMZN vs EBAY vs SHOP vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
Integrated Freight & Logistics
TDUP vs AMZN vs EBAY vs SHOP vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $635M | $2.92T | $48.63B | $145.00B | $85.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $321M | $742.78B | $11.60B | $12.37B | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $90.80B | $2.04B | $1.33B | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 80.4% | 50.6% | 72.0% | 48.0% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 11.5% | 19.6% | 13.3% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.8x | 17.4x | 60.9x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $152.99B | $7.38B | $188M | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $86.81B | $1.87B | $1.53B | $5.89B |
TDUP vs AMZN vs EBAY vs SHOP vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ThredUp Inc. (TDUP) | 100 | 21.1 | -78.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 175.3 | +75.3% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 173.8 | +73.8% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 101.0 | +1.0% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 58.9 | -41.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TDUP vs AMZN vs EBAY vs SHOP vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDUP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.5%, EPS growth 75.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
AMZN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 11.5% ROA vs TDUP's -12.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -19.4%
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 1.10x
- 17.6% margin vs TDUP's -6.7%
- Beta 0.73 vs SHOP's 2.64
- +54.2% vs TDUP's -23.6%
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5%
UPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- PEG 0.42 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Beta 0.90, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.22x
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 60.9x), PEG 0.42 vs 2.08
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 60.9x), PEG 0.42 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs TDUP's -6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.2% vs TDUP's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs TDUP's -12.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -19.4% |
TDUP vs AMZN vs EBAY vs SHOP vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TDUP vs AMZN vs EBAY vs SHOP vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
EBAY leads 2 • TDUP leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EBAY and SHOP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 2312.6x TDUP's $321M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TDUP's -6.7%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $321M | $742.8B | $11.6B | $12.4B | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $155.9B | $2.6B | $1.7B | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $90.8B | $2.0B | $1.3B | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$2.5B | $1.7B | $2.1B | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.4% | +50.6% | +72.0% | +48.0% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +11.5% | +19.6% | +13.3% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +12.2% | +17.6% | +10.8% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | -0.3% | +14.5% | +17.2% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.6% | +16.6% | +19.5% | +34.3% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +74.8% | +5.7% | +15.1% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UPS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, UPS trades at a 87% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.45x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $635M | $2.92T | $48.6B | $145.0B | $85.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $648M | $2.98T | $54.1B | $143.7B | $111.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.94x | 37.82x | 24.52x | 118.87x | 15.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x | 17.40x | 60.91x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | — | 4.06x | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x | 21.03x | 95.83x | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.04x | 4.07x | 4.38x | 12.55x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.11x | 7.14x | 10.61x | 10.82x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3527.12x | 378.98x | 29.28x | 72.25x | 17.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-36 for TDUP. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs UPS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.1% | +23.3% | +44.1% | +10.5% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | +11.5% | +11.5% | +9.0% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.4% | +14.7% | +16.8% | +9.4% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.8% | +15.3% | +17.4% | +11.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.37x | 1.60x | 0.01x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $66.2B | $5.5B | -$1.3B | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $86.8B | $1.9B | $1.5B | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $153.0B | $7.4B | $188M | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.28x | 39.96x | 10.52x | — | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,948 for TDUP. Over the past 12 months, EBAY leads with a +54.2% total return vs TDUP's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs UPS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.9% | +19.7% | +22.6% | -28.9% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.6% | +43.7% | +54.2% | +18.2% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.2% | +156.2% | +137.4% | +73.6% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.5% | +64.8% | +86.3% | +0.8% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.4% | +697.8% | +369.5% | +4123.0% | +44.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.0% | +36.8% | +33.4% | +20.2% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs TDUP's 40.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 1.51x | 0.73x | 2.64x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.28 | $278.56 | $111.38 | $182.19 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.08 | $185.01 | $67.87 | $88.14 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.1% | +97.3% | +95.5% | +61.3% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 81.1 | 63.1 | 34.7 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 45.5M | 5.4M | 8.7M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TDUP as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", SHOP as "Buy", UPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, UPS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.34% vs EBAY's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.67 | $306.77 | $109.67 | $164.75 | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 94 | 68 | 63 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 7 | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.15 | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
UPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). EBAY leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
TDUP vs AMZN vs EBAY vs SHOP vs UPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ThredUp Inc. (TDUP) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS?
On trailing P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Parcel Service, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -70. 5% for ThredUp Inc. (TDUP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus TDUP's -75. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 259% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ThredUp Inc. grew EPS 75. 4% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -6. 5% for ThredUp Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -6. 5% for TDUP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDUP leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 46. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TDUP, AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TDUP or AMZN or EBAY or SHOP or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TDUP and AMZN and EBAY and SHOP and UPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (TDUP (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology) and UPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TDUP is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EBAY, UPS pay a dividend while TDUP, AMZN, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.