Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TECK vs FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs CMCL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Copper
Gold
TECK vs FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs CMCL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Copper | Copper | Copper | Gold |
| Market Cap | $29.25B | $87.11B | $9.46B | $148.31B | $451M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.41B | $26.42B | $2.22B | $13.42B | $264M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.85B | $2.73B | $570M | $4.33B | $55M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 27.8% | 32.5% | 56.7% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 27.8% | 41.4% | 52.2% | 44.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 22.4x | 15.3x | 25.4x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $10.39B | $11.50B | $1.09B | $7.41B | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.01B | $3.35B | $568M | $4.30B | $36M |
TECK vs FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs CMCL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 640.1 | +540.1% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 668.2 | +568.2% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) | 100 | 883.3 | +783.3% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 519.7 | +419.7% |
| Caledonia Mining Co… (CMCL) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TECK vs FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs CMCL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TECK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FCX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CMCL's 4.4%
HBM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
SCCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs TECK's 6.0%
- 32.3% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
- 21.4% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 38.6% vs 4.4%
CMCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 4.4%
- Rev growth 38.9%, EPS growth 204.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 1.69x
- PEG 0.60 vs SCCO's 1.22
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.9% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.4x), PEG 0.60 vs 1.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs FCX's 10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs HBM's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CMCL's 4.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 38.6% vs 4.4% |
TECK vs FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs CMCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TECK vs FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs CMCL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
CMCL leads 1 • HBM leads 1 • TECK leads 0 • FCX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 100.1x CMCL's $264M. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $26.4B | $2.2B | $13.4B | $264M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.8B | $9.6B | $1.4B | $7.9B | $132M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $2.7B | $570M | $4.3B | $55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $482M | $6.2B | $215M | $3.4B | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +27.8% | +32.5% | +56.7% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +27.8% | +41.4% | +52.2% | +44.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +10.3% | +25.8% | +32.3% | +20.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +23.6% | +9.7% | +25.5% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | +12.2% | +26.0% | +39.0% | +49.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +128.8% | +154.2% | +5.1% | +54.5% | +73.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCL leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, CMCL trades at a 79% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCL offers better value at 0.80x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.3B | $87.1B | $9.5B | $148.3B | $451M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.2B | $95.3B | $10.0B | $151.4B | $448M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.29x | 39.88x | 16.34x | 34.26x | 8.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.98x | 22.41x | 15.31x | 25.40x | 6.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | — | 1.64x | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.33x | 11.16x | 9.77x | 19.24x | 3.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.71x | 3.38x | 4.30x | 11.05x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | 2.84x | 2.93x | 13.55x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 78.05x | 47.82x | 43.28x | 10.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. CMCL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs HBM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +8.9% | +19.2% | +42.0% | +20.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +4.7% | +9.8% | +21.4% | +14.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +12.8% | +12.0% | +38.6% | +32.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +12.4% | +11.3% | +39.2% | +35.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.37x | 0.34x | 0.67x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $8.1B | $524M | $3.1B | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $3.4B | $568M | $4.3B | $36M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.4B | $11.5B | $1.1B | $7.4B | $33M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.16x | 17.68x | 13.44x | 19.33x | 33.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCO five years ago would be worth $26,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +219.0% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBM at 65.2% vs TECK's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.7% | +17.3% | +18.7% | +21.4% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.8% | +65.3% | +219.0% | +110.5% | +72.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.5% | +70.7% | +350.8% | +151.0% | +75.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.8% | +44.3% | +159.2% | +167.4% | +74.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +599.3% | +507.7% | +552.2% | +668.4% | +478.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | +19.5% | +65.2% | +35.9% | +20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TECK and CMCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCL is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs CMCL's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.79x | 1.91x | 1.78x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.97 | $70.97 | $28.74 | $223.89 | $38.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.98 | $35.15 | $7.42 | $85.72 | $13.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +85.4% | +83.0% | +80.2% | +60.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 49.1 | 54.0 | 54.1 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 15.4M | 5.3M | 1.6M | 189K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCX and CMCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TECK as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", HBM as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", CMCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for FCX (target: $67) vs -56.6% for HBM (target: $10). For income investors, CMCL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.37% vs TECK's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.50 | $67.00 | $10.34 | $156.40 | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 41 | 20 | 30 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.0% | +0.1% | +1.7% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | $0.60 | $0.01 | $2.96 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TECK vs FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs CMCL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is the stronger pick with 38.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teck Resources Limited (TECK) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL?
On trailing P/E, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is the cheapest at 8.
3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc is actually cheaper at 6. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc wins at 0. 60x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL?
Over the past 5 years, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) delivered a total return of +167.
4%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +668. 4% versus CMCL's +478. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
28β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning HBM is approximately 49% more volatile than CMCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is pulling ahead at 38.
9% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMCL leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 19. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 10. 5% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL?
In this comparison, CMCL (4.
4% yield), SCCO (1. 7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. HBM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TECK or FCX or HBM or SCCO or CMCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
28), 4. 4% yield, +478. 3% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCL: +478. 3%, HBM: +552. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TECK and FCX and HBM and SCCO and CMCL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CMCL is a small-cap high-growth stock. TECK, FCX, SCCO, CMCL pay a dividend while HBM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.