Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TFSL vs HOMB vs WAFD vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TFSL vs HOMB vs WAFD vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.22B | $5.29B | $2.73B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $792M | $1.45B | $1.41B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $91M | $458M | $243M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 65.6% | 50.9% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 36.0% | 20.5% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 45.1x | 10.8x | 10.9x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.90B | $1.20B | $1.82B | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $429M | $910M | $657M | $108M |
TFSL vs HOMB vs WAFD vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TFS Financial Corpo… (TFSL) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.5 | +37.5% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 104.2 | +4.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TFSL vs HOMB vs WAFD vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TFSL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 14.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 0.05x
- Beta 0.76, yield 1.4%, current ratio 0.05x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CVBF's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.8% vs TFSL's 1.7%
- 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 14.1x), PEG 3.55 vs 4.44
- 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.0%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- 84.4% 10Y total return vs CVBF's 67.6%
- PEG 3.54 vs TFSL's 34.70
- +28.5% vs HOMB's -1.9%
CVBF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 14.1x), PEG 3.55 vs 4.44 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CVBF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs CVBF's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CVBF's 0.4% |
TFSL vs HOMB vs WAFD vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TFSL vs HOMB vs WAFD vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • WAFD leads 1 • TFSL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.3x CVBF's $643M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TFSL's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $792M | $1.5B | $1.4B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133M | $601M | $277M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $91M | $458M | $243M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $83M | $354M | $226M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +65.6% | +50.9% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +36.0% | +20.5% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +27.7% | +16.0% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +29.1% | +14.8% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +26.0% | +46.3% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 72% valuation discount to TFSL's 47.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CVBF offers better value at 4.25x vs TFSL's 36.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $5.3B | $2.7B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $5.6B | $3.9B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.03x | 13.36x | 13.56x | 13.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 45.07x | 10.83x | 10.89x | 14.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 36.20x | 4.39x | 4.41x | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 63.11x | 10.12x | 12.98x | 13.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.33x | 3.64x | 1.93x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 1.36x | 0.94x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.50x | 12.53x | 13.09x | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for TFSL. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TFSL's 2.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | +10.9% | +8.0% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +2.0% | +1.0% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +7.2% | +3.9% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +9.8% | +5.7% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.59x | 0.30x | 0.60x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $292M | $1.2B | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $429M | $910M | $657M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $1.2B | $1.8B | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.24x | 1.44x | 0.48x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,349 for TFSL. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +28.5% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.0% | -3.0% | +11.9% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.8% | -1.9% | +28.5% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.9% | +42.0% | +51.6% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +6.6% | +22.5% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.5% | +58.2% | +84.4% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.2% | +12.4% | +14.9% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TFSL and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TFSL is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.81x | 0.79x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.58 | $30.83 | $36.12 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.54 | $25.68 | $26.31 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +87.1% | +98.8% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 50.3 | 68.3 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 737K | 1.4M | 661K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TFSL as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs TFSL's 1.41%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $32.00 | $35.00 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 19 | 11 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 21 | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.21 | $0.75 | $1.05 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.6% | +3.7% | +2.9% |
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TFSL vs HOMB vs WAFD vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus TFS Financial Corporation at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WaFd, Inc. wins at 3. 54x versus TFS Financial Corporation's 34. 70x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +22. 5%, compared to +3. 5% for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAFD returned +83. 9% versus TFSL's +37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 92β — meaning CVBF is approximately 24% more volatile than TFSL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 3% for TFS Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TFS Financial Corporation grew EPS 14. 3% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 11. 5% for TFS Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 14. 5% for TFSL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 54x versus TFS Financial Corporation's 34. 70x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 45. 1x for TFS Financial Corporation — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 4% for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL).
09Is TFSL or HOMB or WAFD or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74), 1. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TFSL: +37. 8%, CVBF: +66. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TFSL and HOMB and WAFD and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TFSL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.