Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Banks - Regional
TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.22B | $2.35B | $88.45B | $2.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $792M | $867M | $12.64B | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $91M | $169M | $3.30B | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 72.1% | 61.9% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 25.3% | 38.7% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 45.6x | 10.8x | 19.5x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $4.90B | $327M | $20.28B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $429M | $185M | $837M | $657M |
TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TFS Financial Corpo… (TFSL) | 100 | 97.7 | -2.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TFSL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- PEG 1.53 vs TFSL's 35.11
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- NIM 3.1% vs TFSL's 1.7%
ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- 225.3% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +28.5% vs ICE's -10.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • TFSL leads 1 • WAFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 16.0x TFSL's $792M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TFSL's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $792M | $867M | $12.6B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133M | $241M | $6.5B | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $91M | $169M | $3.3B | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $83M | $225M | $4.3B | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +72.1% | +61.9% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +25.3% | +38.7% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +19.5% | +26.1% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +25.2% | +33.9% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +39.5% | +23.1% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 71% valuation discount to TFSL's 47.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs TFSL's 36.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $2.4B | $88.4B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $2.5B | $107.9B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.03x | 13.53x | 27.06x | 13.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 45.61x | 10.80x | 19.48x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 36.20x | 1.92x | 3.05x | 4.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 63.11x | 10.35x | 16.71x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.33x | 2.71x | 7.00x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 1.21x | 3.08x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.50x | 10.75x | 20.62x | 13.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for TFSL. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TFSL's 2.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs TFSL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | +9.5% | +11.6% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.1% | +2.3% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +7.9% | +7.5% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +2.4% | +9.5% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.59x | 0.17x | 0.70x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $142M | $19.4B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $429M | $185M | $837M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $327M | $20.3B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.24x | 1.05x | 6.53x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TFSL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ICE five years ago would be worth $14,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,349 for TFSL. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +28.5% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TFSL at 16.2% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.0% | +9.3% | -2.1% | +11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.8% | +9.0% | -10.4% | +28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.9% | +54.1% | +50.8% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +29.9% | +43.4% | +22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.5% | +102.2% | +225.3% | +84.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.2% | +15.5% | +14.7% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICE and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.89x | 0.33x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.58 | $46.92 | $189.35 | $36.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.54 | $39.20 | $143.17 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +96.1% | +82.5% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 57.3 | 38.8 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 737K | 236K | 3.0M | 661K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TFSL as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", ICE as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs ICE's 1.24%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $46.00 | $195.71 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 | 36 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +3.2% | +1.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 12 | 14 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.21 | $1.43 | $1.93 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.4% | +1.6% | +3.7% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus TFS Financial Corporation at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus TFS Financial Corporation's 35. 11x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) delivered a total return of +43. 4%, compared to +3. 5% for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +225. 3% versus TFSL's +37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 171% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for TFS Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 11. 5% for TFS Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 14. 5% for TFSL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus TFS Financial Corporation's 35. 11x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 45. 6x for TFS Financial Corporation — 34. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 25. 3% to $195. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TFSL and NBTB and ICE and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TFSL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.