Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TFSL
TFS Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.22B
5Y Perf.-2.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.+43.9%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$88.45B
5Y Perf.+60.6%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.73B
5Y Perf.+37.9%

TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TFSL logoTFSL
NBTB logoNBTB
ICE logoICE
WAFD logoWAFD
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$4.22B$2.35B$88.45B$2.73B
Revenue (TTM)$792M$867M$12.64B$1.41B
Net Income (TTM)$91M$169M$3.30B$243M
Gross Margin40.3%72.1%61.9%50.9%
Operating Margin14.5%25.3%38.7%20.5%
Forward P/E45.6x10.8x19.5x10.9x
Total Debt$4.90B$327M$20.28B$1.82B
Cash & Equiv.$429M$185M$837M$657M

TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TFSL
NBTB
ICE
WAFD
StockMay 20May 26Return
TFS Financial Corpo… (TFSL)10097.7-2.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100143.9+43.9%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100160.6+60.6%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100137.9+37.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NBTB and ICE are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. WAFD also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TFSL
TFS Financial Corporation
The Financial Play

TFSL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
  • PEG 1.53 vs TFSL's 35.11
  • Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
  • NIM 3.1% vs TFSL's 1.7%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
  • 225.3% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +28.5% vs ICE's -10.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
ValueNBTB logoNBTBLower P/E (10.8x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.19
Quality / MarginsICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.33 vs NBTB's 0.89
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
Momentum (1Y)WAFD logoWAFD+28.5% vs ICE's -10.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5%

TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TFSLTFS Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Banking
100.0%$10M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLICELAGGINGWAFD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 16.0x TFSL's $792M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TFSL's 11.5%.

MetricTFSL logoTFSLTFS Financial Cor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$792M$867M$12.6B$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$133M$241M$6.5B$277M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$91M$169M$3.3B$243M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$83M$225M$4.3B$226M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.3%+72.1%+61.9%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.5%+25.3%+38.7%+20.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.5%+19.5%+26.1%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.0%+25.2%+33.9%+14.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.5%+39.5%+23.1%+46.3%
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 71% valuation discount to TFSL's 47.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs TFSL's 36.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricTFSL logoTFSLTFS Financial Cor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.2B$2.4B$88.4B$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.7B$2.5B$107.9B$3.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS47.03x13.53x27.06x13.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.45.61x10.80x19.48x10.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate36.20x1.92x3.05x4.41x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple63.11x10.35x16.71x12.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.33x2.71x7.00x1.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.22x1.21x3.08x0.94x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF59.50x10.75x20.62x13.09x
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for TFSL. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TFSL's 2.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs TFSL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTFSL logoTFSLTFS Financial Cor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.8%+9.5%+11.6%+8.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+1.1%+2.3%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.3%+7.9%+7.5%+3.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.7%+2.4%+9.5%+5.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96797
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.59x0.17x0.70x0.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4.5B$142M$19.4B$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$429M$185M$837M$657M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.9B$327M$20.3B$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.24x1.05x6.53x0.48x
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TFSL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ICE five years ago would be worth $14,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,349 for TFSL. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +28.5% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TFSL at 16.2% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTFSL logoTFSLTFS Financial Cor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+13.0%+9.3%-2.1%+11.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.8%+9.0%-10.4%+28.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.9%+54.1%+50.8%+51.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.5%+29.9%+43.4%+22.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+37.5%+102.2%+225.3%+84.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.2%+15.5%+14.7%+14.9%
TFSL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ICE and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTFSL logoTFSLTFS Financial Cor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.76x0.89x0.33x0.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.58$46.92$189.35$36.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.54$39.20$143.17$26.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+96.1%+82.5%+98.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.657.338.868.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded737K236K3.0M661K
Evenly matched — ICE and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TFSL as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", ICE as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs ICE's 1.24%.

MetricTFSL logoTFSLTFS Financial Cor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$46.00$195.71$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts4103611
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%+3.2%+1.2%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1112147
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.21$1.43$1.93$1.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.4%+1.6%+3.7%
Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallIntercontinental Exchange, … (ICE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TFSL vs NBTB vs ICE vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?

On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus TFS Financial Corporation at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus TFS Financial Corporation's 35. 11x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?

Over the past 5 years, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) delivered a total return of +43. 4%, compared to +3. 5% for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +225. 3% versus TFSL's +37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 171% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for TFS Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 11. 5% for TFS Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 14. 5% for TFSL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus TFS Financial Corporation's 35. 11x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 45. 6x for TFS Financial Corporation — 34. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 25. 3% to $195. 71.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is TFSL or NBTB or ICE or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TFSL and NBTB and ICE and WAFD?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TFSL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TFSL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NBTB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WAFD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TFSL and NBTB and ICE and WAFD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TFSL: 4.4% · NBTB: 10.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(TFSL: 11.5% · NBTB: 19.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TFSL: 47.0x · NBTB: 13.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.