Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TG vs UFPI vs TREX vs WY vs LPX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Construction
REIT - Specialty
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
TG vs UFPI vs TREX vs WY vs LPX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Construction | REIT - Specialty | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products |
| Market Cap | $354M | $4.76B | $4.12B | $17.09B | $5.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $723M | $6.19B | $1.18B | $6.92B | $2.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $264M | $191M | $397M | $82M |
| Gross Margin | 14.7% | 16.6% | 39.2% | 13.4% | 19.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 5.4% | 22.1% | 7.7% | 5.4% |
| Forward P/E | 4.9x | 18.0x | 24.0x | 83.6x | 35.2x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $230M | $229M | $5.57B | $401M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $925M | $4M | $464M | $292M |
TG vs UFPI vs TREX vs WY vs LPX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tredegar Corporation (TG) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 184.5 | +84.5% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
| Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
| Louisiana-Pacific C… (LPX) | 100 | 318.3 | +218.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TG vs UFPI vs TREX vs WY vs LPX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 136.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
- 20.9% revenue growth vs LPX's -7.9%
- +24.9% vs TREX's -30.8%
UFPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 7.4%, current ratio 4.59x
- PEG 3.95 vs TREX's 7.16
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.7%, current ratio 4.59x
TREX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 16.3% margin vs LPX's 3.2%
- 12.3% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 16.4% vs 2.4%
WY is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.51 vs TREX's 1.47
LPX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 346.8% 10Y total return vs UFPI's 230.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.9% revenue growth vs LPX's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 35.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs LPX's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs TREX's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs WY's 3.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.9% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 16.4% vs 2.4% |
TG vs UFPI vs TREX vs WY vs LPX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TG vs UFPI vs TREX vs WY vs LPX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories
UFPI leads 1 • TG leads 1 • WY leads 0 • LPX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 9.6x TG's $723M. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPX's 3.2%. On growth, TG holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $723M | $6.2B | $1.2B | $6.9B | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $498M | $309M | $1.0B | $246M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $264M | $191M | $397M | $82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $298M | $263M | $516M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +16.6% | +39.2% | +13.4% | +19.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +5.4% | +22.1% | +7.7% | +5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +4.3% | +16.3% | +5.7% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +4.8% | +22.3% | +7.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -8.4% | +1.0% | -2.0% | -20.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | -31.5% | +3.6% | +100.0% | -70.0% |
Valuation Metrics
UFPI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, TG trades at a 72% valuation discount to WY's 52.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UFPI offers better value at 3.67x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $354M | $4.8B | $4.1B | $17.1B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $4.1B | $4.3B | $22.2B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.75x | 16.77x | 22.00x | 52.67x | 36.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.89x | 18.05x | 23.95x | 83.63x | 35.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.67x | 6.58x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.85x | 7.70x | 13.53x | 22.79x | 13.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.75x | 3.51x | 2.47x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 1.60x | 4.05x | 1.81x | 3.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.49x | 17.24x | 30.60x | 194.19x | 57.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX delivers a 18.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $4 for WY. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WY's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TG scores 7/9 vs WY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.7% | +8.4% | +18.8% | +4.2% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | +6.5% | +12.3% | +2.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +11.4% | +16.4% | +2.4% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +10.2% | +23.2% | +3.0% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.07x | 0.22x | 0.59x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42M | -$695M | $225M | $5.1B | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $925M | $4M | $464M | $292M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $230M | $229M | $5.6B | $401M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.63x | 43.92x | — | 1.95x | 11.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LPX five years ago would be worth $11,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, TG leads with a +24.9% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TG at 8.9% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | -8.6% | +9.3% | +0.5% | -7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.9% | -12.0% | -30.8% | -5.0% | -14.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.0% | +6.3% | -30.4% | -11.7% | +24.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | +1.5% | -64.0% | -23.7% | +10.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | +230.6% | +239.9% | +16.5% | +346.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | +2.1% | -11.4% | -4.1% | +7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TG and WY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TG currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.41x | 0.94x | 1.52x | 0.51x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.34 | $118.00 | $68.78 | $27.86 | $102.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.25 | $80.06 | $29.77 | $21.16 | $66.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +71.1% | +56.9% | +85.1% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.8 | 35.6 | 51.3 | 45.5 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 148K | 379K | 1.7M | 5.0M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UFPI and WY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TG as "Hold", UFPI as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", WY as "Buy", LPX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.4% upside for LPX (target: $99) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). For income investors, WY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs LPX's 1.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $103.00 | $44.50 | $29.83 | $98.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 | 31 | 25 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | — | +3.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.40 | — | $0.84 | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.1% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +1.2% |
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UFPI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TG vs UFPI vs TREX vs WY vs LPX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tredegar Corporation (TG) is the stronger pick with 20.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). Tredegar Corporation (TG) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX?
On trailing P/E, Tredegar Corporation (TG) is the cheapest at 14.
8x versus Weyerhaeuser Company at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Tredegar Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UFP Industries, Inc. wins at 3. 95x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX?
Over the past 5 years, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) delivered a total return of +10.
5%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPX returned +344. 6% versus TG's -14. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning TREX is approximately 198% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 59% for Weyerhaeuser Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tredegar Corporation (TG) is pulling ahead at 20.
9% versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tredegar Corporation grew EPS 136. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TREX leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus 3. 3% for Tredegar Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus 3. 7% for TG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 95x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Tredegar Corporation (TG) trades at 4. 9x forward P/E versus 83. 6x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 78. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPX: 30. 4% to $98. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX?
In this comparison, WY (3.
5% yield), UFPI (1. 7% yield), LPX (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TG, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TG or UFPI or TREX or WY or LPX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +16. 0%, TG: -14. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TG and UFPI and TREX and WY and LPX?
These companies operate in different sectors (TG (Industrials) and UFPI (Basic Materials) and TREX (Industrials) and WY (Real Estate) and LPX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TG is a small-cap high-growth stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. UFPI, WY, LPX pay a dividend while TG, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.