Copper
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TGB vs LIN vs CAT vs FCX vs SCCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Agricultural - Machinery
Copper
Copper
TGB vs LIN vs CAT vs FCX vs SCCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Copper | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural - Machinery | Copper | Copper |
| Market Cap | $2.26B | $228.85B | $416.75B | $87.11B | $148.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $673M | $34.66B | $70.75B | $26.42B | $13.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-30M | $7.13B | $9.42B | $2.73B | $4.33B |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | 46.0% | 32.5% | 27.8% | 56.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 28.8% | 16.6% | 27.8% | 52.2% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | 27.7x | 37.0x | 22.4x | 25.4x |
| Total Debt | $747M | $26.99B | $43.33B | $11.50B | $7.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188M | $5.06B | $9.98B | $3.35B | $4.30B |
TGB vs LIN vs CAT vs FCX vs SCCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) | 100 | 1886.2 | +1786.2% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 243.7 | +143.7% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 747.1 | +647.1% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 536.3 | +436.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGB vs LIN vs CAT vs FCX vs SCCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 12.7% 10Y total return vs CAT's 12.3%
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.4x)
- +275.6% vs LIN's +11.2%
LIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- Beta 0.24 vs TGB's 1.80, lower leverage
CAT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs CAT's 1.32
SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 17.4%, EPS growth 24.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.78, Low D/E 66.8%, current ratio 3.89x
- Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
- 17.4% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.4% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs TGB's -4.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs TGB's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CAT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +275.6% vs LIN's +11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs TGB's -1.3%, ROIC 38.6% vs 8.4% |
TGB vs LIN vs CAT vs FCX vs SCCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TGB vs LIN vs CAT vs FCX vs SCCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FCX leads 1 • TGB leads 1 • LIN leads 0 • CAT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 105.1x TGB's $673M. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGB's -4.5%. On growth, TGB holds the edge at +45.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $673M | $34.7B | $70.8B | $26.4B | $13.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249M | $12.1B | $14.0B | $9.6B | $7.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$30M | $7.1B | $9.4B | $2.7B | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $5.1B | $11.4B | $6.2B | $3.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +46.0% | +32.5% | +27.8% | +56.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +28.8% | +16.6% | +27.8% | +52.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +20.6% | +13.3% | +10.3% | +32.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +14.7% | +16.2% | +23.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.3% | +8.2% | +22.2% | +12.2% | +39.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.7% | +13.4% | +30.2% | +154.2% | +54.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FCX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.8x trailing earnings, LIN trades at a 29% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs CAT's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $228.8B | $416.8B | $87.1B | $148.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $250.8B | $450.1B | $95.3B | $151.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -106.48x | 33.85x | 47.57x | 39.88x | 34.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.38x | 27.67x | 36.99x | 22.41x | 25.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | 1.69x | 1.33x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.62x | 19.75x | 33.41x | 11.16x | 19.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.58x | 6.73x | 6.17x | 3.38x | 11.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.46x | 5.82x | 19.71x | 2.84x | 13.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.97x | 40.56x | 78.05x | 43.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-5 for TGB. FCX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs TGB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | +17.8% | +47.5% | +8.9% | +42.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | +8.3% | +10.0% | +4.7% | +21.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +11.3% | +15.9% | +12.8% | +38.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +13.0% | +19.1% | +12.4% | +39.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.68x | 2.03x | 0.37x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $559M | $21.9B | $33.4B | $8.1B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188M | $5.1B | $10.0B | $3.4B | $4.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $747M | $27.0B | $43.3B | $11.5B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 34.52x | 9.22x | 17.68x | 19.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, TGB leads with a +275.6% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGB at 68.3% vs LIN's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.5% | +15.5% | +50.2% | +17.3% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +275.6% | +11.2% | +181.5% | +65.3% | +110.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +377.0% | +39.7% | +324.9% | +70.7% | +151.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +203.3% | +73.9% | +282.5% | +44.3% | +167.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1267.9% | +375.2% | +1227.6% | +507.7% | +668.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.3% | +11.8% | +62.0% | +19.5% | +35.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGB's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TGB's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 0.23x | 1.56x | 1.85x | 1.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.25 | $521.28 | $931.35 | $70.97 | $223.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.89 | $387.78 | $318.11 | $35.15 | $85.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +94.7% | +96.2% | +85.4% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 51.7 | 76.2 | 49.1 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 2.3M | 2.4M | 15.4M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAT and SCCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGB as "Hold", LIN as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for TGB (target: $9) vs -12.9% for SCCO (target: $156). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $539.71 | $850.50 | $67.00 | $156.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 28 | 53 | 41 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 8 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $5.86 | $0.60 | $2.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | +1.2% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TGB vs LIN vs CAT vs FCX vs SCCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger pick with 17.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO?
On trailing P/E, Linde plc (LIN) is the cheapest at 33.
8x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Taseko Mines Limited is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGB returned +1313% versus LIN's +374. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
23β versus Taseko Mines Limited's 2. 04β — meaning TGB is approximately 773% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is pulling ahead at 17.
4% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern Copper Corporation grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -104. 2% for Taseko Mines Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGB leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -4. 5% for Taseko Mines Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 37. 0x for Caterpillar Inc. — 22. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TGB: 24. 1% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
7% yield), LIN (1. 2% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), CAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. TGB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGB or LIN or CAT or FCX or SCCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
23), 1. 2% yield, +374. 6% 10Y return). Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +374. 6%, TGB: +1313%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGB and LIN and CAT and FCX and SCCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (TGB (Basic Materials) and LIN (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and FCX (Basic Materials) and SCCO (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. LIN, CAT, FCX, SCCO pay a dividend while TGB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.