Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TGTX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
TGTX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $6.87B | $9.63B | $3.86B | $5.35B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $700M | $-92K | $1.10B | $827M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $462M | $-327M | $376M | $-187M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 83.0% | — | 91.5% | 49.7% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | — | 7.4% | -8.3% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | 32.3x | — | 50.9x | 8.3x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $261M | $110K | $52M | $492M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $357M | $178M | $985M | $1.98B |
TGTX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 170.3 | +70.3% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGTX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.77
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 40.2%, current ratio 4.10x
- Beta 0.77, current ratio 4.10x
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5%
ACAD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs TGTX's 436.5%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 14.1x)
Among these 5 stocks, IQV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs PTCT's -22.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 16.4% vs -65.0% |
TGTX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TGTX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • ACAD leads 0 • PTCT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTCT's -22.6%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $700M | -$92,000 | $1.1B | $827M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $150M | -$357M | $96M | -$37M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $462M | -$327M | $376M | -$187M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$283M | $212M | -$229M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.0% | — | +91.5% | +49.7% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | — | +7.4% | -8.3% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | — | +34.3% | -22.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | — | +19.4% | -27.7% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.6% | — | +9.7% | -76.8% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +2.7% | -81.8% | -100.3% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTCT and IQV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 64% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 57.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $9.6B | $3.9B | $5.3B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.1B | $9.3B | $3.7B | $4.9B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.53x | -24.72x | 9.85x | 8.29x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.25x | — | 50.91x | — | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.07x | — | 26.91x | 5.42x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.15x | — | 3.61x | 3.09x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.72x | 8.54x | 3.15x | — | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 36.74x | 7.61x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +87.4% | -43.0% | +35.6% | — | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.8% | -40.2% | +26.2% | -6.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.4% | -65.0% | +10.0% | — | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | -49.3% | +10.1% | +55.9% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.00x | 0.04x | — | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $182M | -$357M | -$126M | -$492M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $357M | $178M | $985M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $261M | $110,000 | $52M | $492M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.67x | — | — | -1.67x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $16,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,621 for IQV. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.9% | +16.4% | -13.7% | -16.0% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +775.0% | +52.4% | +58.2% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | +1976.5% | +4.7% | +16.1% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | -20.8% | +7.1% | +60.3% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.5% | -20.1% | -22.9% | +733.2% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.1% | +174.9% | +1.5% | +5.1% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.55x | 1.26x | 1.13x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.00 | $356.00 | $27.81 | $87.50 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.28 | $35.18 | $14.45 | $37.94 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +93.6% | +81.1% | +73.7% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.2 | 55.6 | 44.2 | 45.3 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 378K | 1.8M | 1.0M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGTX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs -9.4% for TGTX (target: $39).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.00 | $544.40 | $34.78 | $89.67 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 | 37 | 26 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
TGTX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +60. 3%, compared to -23. 8% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus ACAD's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 100% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 36. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63. 3% to $544. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TGTX or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), +436. 5% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGTX: +436. 5%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGTX and PRAX and ACAD and PTCT and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.