Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
THRY vs YELP vs ANGI vs HUBS vs FROG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Software - Application
THRY vs YELP vs ANGI vs HUBS vs FROG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $164M | $1.69B | $210M | $12.58B | $6.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $771M | $1.47B | $1.02B | $3.30B | $563M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $139M | $20M | $100M | $-62M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 90.0% | 91.1% | 83.7% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 12.4% | 4.8% | 1.9% | -14.9% |
| Forward P/E | 33.8x | 13.7x | 6.1x | 19.6x | 63.4x |
| Total Debt | $257M | $42M | $498M | $485M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $216M | $304M | $882M | $77M |
THRY vs YELP vs ANGI vs HUBS vs FROG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) | 100 | 63.4 | -36.6% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 141.7 | +41.7% |
| Angi Inc. (ANGI) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 83.6 | -16.4% |
| JFrog Ltd. (FROG) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THRY vs YELP vs ANGI vs HUBS vs FROG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THRY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
YELP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.82
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 2.99x
- 9.5% margin vs FROG's -10.9%
ANGI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 63.4x)
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- 469.1% 10Y total return vs YELP's 10.2%
FROG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 24.1% revenue growth vs ANGI's -13.0%
- +65.0% vs THRY's -72.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs ANGI's -13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 63.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.5% margin vs FROG's -10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs THRY's 2.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.0% vs THRY's -72.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs FROG's -4.7%, ROIC 25.1% vs -8.0% |
THRY vs YELP vs ANGI vs HUBS vs FROG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
THRY vs YELP vs ANGI vs HUBS vs FROG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANGI leads in 1 of 6 categories
YELP leads 1 • FROG leads 1 • THRY leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — YELP and FROG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 5.9x FROG's $563M. YELP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FROG's -10.9%. On growth, FROG holds the edge at +25.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $771M | $1.5B | $1.0B | $3.3B | $563M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86M | $236M | $86M | $166M | -$66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $139M | $20M | $100M | -$62M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $281M | $26M | $712M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +90.0% | +91.1% | +83.7% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +12.4% | +4.8% | +1.9% | -14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +9.5% | +1.9% | +3.0% | -10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +19.1% | +2.5% | +21.6% | +26.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | +0.8% | -3.2% | +23.4% | +25.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.5% | -16.7% | -163.3% | +2.5% | +56.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ANGI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ANGI trades at a 99% valuation discount to THRY's 539.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANGI's 3.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUBS's 69.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $164M | $1.7B | $210M | $12.6B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $410M | $1.5B | $404M | $12.2B | $6.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 539.13x | 12.71x | 5.57x | 284.08x | -91.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.82x | 13.74x | 6.10x | 19.61x | 63.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.30x | 6.18x | 3.22x | 69.24x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 1.15x | 0.20x | 4.02x | 12.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 2.61x | 0.26x | 6.29x | 7.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.28x | 5.23x | 4.62x | 17.77x | 48.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-7 for FROG. FROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to THRY's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YELP scores 6/9 vs THRY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | +19.7% | +2.1% | +5.0% | -7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +14.1% | +1.2% | +2.7% | -4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.6% | +25.1% | +5.0% | +0.4% | -8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.6% | +22.9% | +5.1% | +0.5% | -9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.06x | 0.54x | 0.23x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $246M | -$174M | $194M | -$397M | -$57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $216M | $304M | $882M | $77M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $257M | $42M | $498M | $485M | $19M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.78x | — | 5.38x | 4753.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FROG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FROG five years ago would be worth $15,879 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $386 for ANGI. Over the past 12 months, FROG leads with a +65.0% total return vs THRY's -72.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FROG at 38.5% vs THRY's -43.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | -5.7% | -58.6% | -36.1% | -4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.2% | -19.9% | -65.4% | -62.0% | +65.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | +1.6% | -79.5% | -45.1% | +165.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.3% | -27.9% | -96.1% | -52.1% | +58.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.5% | +10.2% | -94.1% | +469.1% | -12.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.4% | +0.5% | -41.1% | -18.1% | +38.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YELP and FROG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THRY's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FROG currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs THRY's 24.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.31x | 0.82x | 1.85x | 1.18x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.49 | $41.22 | $19.42 | $682.57 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $19.60 | $4.53 | $187.45 | $33.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.0% | +69.1% | +27.0% | +35.8% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 57.2 | 26.1 | 51.1 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.1M | 1.2M | 1.5M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: THRY as "Buy", YELP as "Hold", ANGI as "Hold", HUBS as "Buy", FROG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.3% upside for ANGI (target: $13) vs -0.5% for YELP (target: $28).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $28.33 | $12.75 | $360.89 | $68.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 67 | 54 | 47 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +17.3% | +70.7% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
ANGI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). YELP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
THRY vs YELP vs ANGI vs HUBS vs FROG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG?
On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Thryv Holdings, Inc. at 539. 1x. On forward P/E, Angi Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG?
Over the past 5 years, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) delivered a total return of +58. 8%, compared to -96. 1% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBS returned +469. 1% versus ANGI's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Thryv Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 31β — meaning THRY is approximately 181% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JFrog Ltd. (FROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 118% for Thryv Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -13. 0% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 6% for JFrog Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FROG leads at 23. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG?
Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -13. 5% for JFrog Ltd. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YELP leads at 12. 6% versus -15. 7% for FROG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 63. 4x for JFrog Ltd. — 57. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 143. 3% to $12. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is THRY or YELP or ANGI or HUBS or FROG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YELP: +10. 2%, THRY: -57. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between THRY and YELP and ANGI and HUBS and FROG?
These companies operate in different sectors (THRY (Communication Services) and YELP (Communication Services) and ANGI (Communication Services) and HUBS (Technology) and FROG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: THRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FROG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.