Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TIRX vs AIXI vs BBAI vs ACMR vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Semiconductors
Software - Infrastructure
TIRX vs AIXI vs BBAI vs ACMR vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $240K | $8M | $19.73B | $3.92B | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $115M | $127M | $901M | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-859K | $-53M | $-289M | $94M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 64.3% | 25.8% | 44.4% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -31.7% | -44.2% | -68.3% | 12.1% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 30.8x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $46M | $24M | $303M | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $297K | $847K | $87M | $766M | $30.24B |
TIRX vs AIXI vs BBAI vs ACMR vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tian Ruixiang Holdi… (TIRX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 162.3 | +62.3% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 475.9 | +375.9% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TIRX vs AIXI vs BBAI vs ACMR vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TIRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 6.74x
- 158.7% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.9%
- PEG 0.87 vs MSFT's 1.35
- Better valuation composite
- +195.6% vs TIRX's -99.9%
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- Beta 0.89 vs BBAI's 3.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 158.7% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +195.6% vs TIRX's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs -34.4% |
TIRX vs AIXI vs BBAI vs ACMR vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TIRX vs AIXI vs BBAI vs ACMR vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories
TIRX leads 1 • ACMR leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 40997.2x TIRX's $8M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, TIRX holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $115M | $127M | $901M | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$49M | -$75M | $126M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$858,880 | -$53M | -$289M | $94M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$2M | -$56M | -$69M | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +64.3% | +25.8% | +44.4% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.7% | -44.2% | -68.3% | +12.1% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | -45.9% | -2.3% | +10.4% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | -2.0% | -44.3% | -7.6% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | -64.9% | -0.9% | +9.4% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.3% | -29.9% | +52.0% | -76.1% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TIRX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 29% valuation discount to ACMR's 43.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.22x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $240,371 | $8M | $19.7B | $3.9B | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $53M | $19.7B | $3.5B | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | -0.45x | -5.09x | 43.21x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 30.81x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.22x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 27.49x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 0.11x | 154.51x | 4.35x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | — | 24.45x | 2.06x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.27x | — | — | — | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. TIRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSFT's 0.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.0% | — | -50.7% | +6.1% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.2% | -65.3% | -35.3% | +3.9% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.4% | -34.4% | -19.5% | +7.0% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.0% | -3.4% | -19.6% | +6.6% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 0.04x | 0.16x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $881,311 | $45M | -$63M | -$463M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $297,288 | $846,593 | $87M | $766M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $46M | $24M | $303M | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.13x | -18.17x | 20.44x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for TIRX. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs TIRX's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs TIRX's -95.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.1% | +68.1% | -28.6% | +31.9% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -79.2% | +36.7% | +195.6% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.6% | +49.5% | +487.9% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.6% | -56.9% | +133.4% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.6% | -57.6% | +3065.8% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.0% | -75.9% | +14.3% | +80.5% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIXI and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACMR currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs TIRX's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 0.71x | 3.31x | 3.17x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.75 | $4.02 | $9.39 | $71.65 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.08 | $2.96 | $19.26 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +18.0% | +44.4% | +82.6% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 49.3 | 63.3 | 60.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.4M | 60.6M | 34.6M | 1.2M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", ACMR as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 26.7% for ACMR (target: $75). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $6.00 | $75.00 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 4 | 10 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 3 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.11 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TIRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TIRX vs AIXI vs BBAI vs ACMR vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) is the stronger pick with 158.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ACM Research, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +31. 0% versus TIRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 367% more volatile than AIXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 33% for Microsoft Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) is pulling ahead at 158.
7% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for ACM Research, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -144. 3% for TIRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 30. 8x for ACM Research, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43. 9% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TIRX, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TIRX or AIXI or BBAI or ACMR or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85), 0. 8% yield, +776. 0% 10Y return). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +776. 0%, BBAI: -57. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TIRX and AIXI and BBAI and ACMR and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TIRX (Financial Services) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and ACMR (Technology) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TIRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while TIRX, AIXI, BBAI, ACMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.