Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TJX vs ROST vs BURL vs OLLI vs M
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Discount Stores
Department Stores
TJX vs ROST vs BURL vs OLLI vs M — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Discount Stores | Department Stores |
| Market Cap | $172.55B | $75.27B | $20.04B | $5.13B | $5.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60.37B | $22.75B | $11.56B | $2.65B | $22.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.49B | $2.15B | $610M | $241M | $642M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 27.9% | 41.9% | 40.5% | 36.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 11.9% | 8.9% | 12.2% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 33.2x | 35.1x | 32.4x | 21.6x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $22.38B | $5.21B | $3.99B | $686M | $5.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.23B | $4.59B | $1.23B | $260M | $1.25B |
TJX vs ROST vs BURL vs OLLI vs M — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The TJX Companies, … (TJX) | 100 | 294.6 | +194.6% |
| Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) | 100 | 236.1 | +136.1% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 151.1 | +51.1% |
| Ollie's Bargain Out… (OLLI) | 100 | 91.4 | -8.6% |
| Macy's, Inc. (M) | 100 | 311.6 | +211.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TJX vs ROST vs BURL vs OLLI vs M
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TJX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.1%
- 331.5% 10Y total return vs BURL's 480.9%
- PEG 0.25 vs OLLI's 19.35
- Beta 0.39 vs M's 1.42
ROST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 80.5%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.58x
- 9.4% margin vs M's 2.8%
Among these 5 stocks, BURL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OLLI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.2%
- 16.6% revenue growth vs M's -1.7%
M is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 21.6x)
- +78.8% vs OLLI's -23.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs M's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 21.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs M's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs M's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs M's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.8% vs OLLI's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs M's 4.0%, ROIC 25.5% vs 8.7% |
TJX vs ROST vs BURL vs OLLI vs M — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TJX vs ROST vs BURL vs OLLI vs M — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
M leads in 1 of 6 categories
TJX leads 1 • ROST leads 1 • BURL leads 0 • OLLI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ROST and OLLI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TJX is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.4B annually — 22.8x OLLI's $2.6B. ROST is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to M's 2.8%. On growth, OLLI holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60.4B | $22.8B | $11.6B | $2.6B | $22.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.2B | $3.6B | $1.5B | $375M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.5B | $2.1B | $610M | $241M | $642M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.9B | $2.2B | $232M | $213M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +27.9% | +41.9% | +40.5% | +36.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +11.9% | +8.9% | +12.2% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +9.4% | +5.3% | +9.1% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +9.7% | +2.0% | +8.0% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.5% | +12.2% | +11.5% | +16.8% | -1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.5% | +11.7% | +20.4% | +25.2% | +51.2% |
Valuation Metrics
M leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, M trades at a 75% valuation discount to ROST's 34.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TJX offers better value at 0.24x vs OLLI's 19.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $172.5B | $75.3B | $20.0B | $5.1B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $188.7B | $75.9B | $22.8B | $5.6B | $9.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.85x | 34.63x | 33.30x | 21.48x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.19x | 35.09x | 32.38x | 21.59x | 9.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | 0.37x | — | 19.25x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.40x | 21.17x | 18.00x | 14.68x | 4.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.86x | 3.31x | 1.73x | 1.93x | 0.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.16x | 11.42x | 5.21x | 2.73x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.53x | 34.10x | 116.81x | 17.28x | 5.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX delivers a 53.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $13 for OLLI. OLLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TJX's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROST scores 7/9 vs OLLI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +53.9% | +36.3% | +29.7% | +13.3% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.4% | +14.4% | +6.5% | +8.5% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.5% | +30.0% | +10.3% | +11.1% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.3% | +25.8% | +12.0% | +13.4% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.20x | 0.80x | 1.03x | 0.36x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.2B | $618M | $2.8B | $426M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.2B | $4.6B | $1.2B | $260M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.4B | $5.2B | $4.0B | $686M | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 133.22x | 82.30x | 11.36x | — | 10.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TJX five years ago would be worth $22,603 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,513 for OLLI. Over the past 12 months, M leads with a +78.8% total return vs OLLI's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROST at 30.6% vs OLLI's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | +25.5% | +6.1% | -24.9% | -12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | +62.8% | +33.6% | -23.6% | +78.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.2% | +122.7% | +73.6% | +23.6% | +45.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.0% | +82.8% | -2.4% | -4.9% | +32.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +331.5% | +319.5% | +480.9% | +229.9% | -22.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.9% | +30.6% | +20.2% | +7.3% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TJX and ROST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TJX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than M's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROST currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs OLLI's 59.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 0.89x | 1.30x | 1.03x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $165.82 | $230.43 | $351.85 | $141.74 | $24.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $119.84 | $124.49 | $218.52 | $80.81 | $10.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +99.3% | +90.0% | +59.0% | +81.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 59.8 | 41.0 | 32.0 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 2.4M | 715K | 1.4M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TJX and ROST and M each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TJX as "Buy", ROST as "Buy", BURL as "Buy", OLLI as "Buy", M as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 67.1% upside for OLLI (target: $140) vs -6.6% for ROST (target: $214). For income investors, M offers the higher dividend yield at 3.59% vs ROST's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $172.00 | $213.80 | $331.88 | $139.67 | $19.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 53 | 47 | 35 | 28 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.7% | — | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.64 | $1.64 | — | — | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +1.5% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +4.5% |
M leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TJX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TJX vs ROST vs BURL vs OLLI vs M: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.
(OLLI) is the stronger pick with 16. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Macy's, Inc. (M). Macy's, Inc. (M) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M?
On trailing P/E, Macy's, Inc.
(M) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Ross Stores, Inc. at 34. 6x. On forward P/E, Macy's, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The TJX Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. 's 19. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M?
Over the past 5 years, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) delivered a total return of +126. 0%, compared to -4. 9% for Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. (OLLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +480. 9% versus M's -22. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Macy's, Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning M is approximately 260% more volatile than TJX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. (OLLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 2% for The TJX Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.
(OLLI) is pulling ahead at 16. 6% versus -1. 7% for Macy's, Inc. (M). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Burlington Stores, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to 4. 6% for Ross Stores, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OLLI leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M?
Ross Stores, Inc.
(ROST) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus 2. 8% for Macy's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLLI leads at 12. 2% versus 4. 6% for M. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLLI leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. 's 19. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Macy's, Inc. (M) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 35. 1x for Ross Stores, Inc. — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OLLI: 67. 1% to $139. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M?
In this comparison, M (3.
6% yield), TJX (1. 1% yield), ROST (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BURL, OLLI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TJX or ROST or BURL or OLLI or M better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 1% yield, +331. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TJX: +331. 5%, BURL: +480. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TJX and ROST and BURL and OLLI and M?
These companies operate in different sectors (TJX (Consumer Cyclical) and ROST (Consumer Cyclical) and BURL (Consumer Cyclical) and OLLI (Consumer Defensive) and M (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TJX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ROST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; OLLI is a small-cap high-growth stock; M is a small-cap deep-value stock. TJX, ROST, M pay a dividend while BURL, OLLI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.