Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TMDX vs AVXL vs STVN vs NVCR vs LIVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
TMDX vs AVXL vs STVN vs NVCR vs LIVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $2.52B | $310M | $5.19B | $1.88B | $3.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $636M | $0.00 | $1.18B | $674M | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $172M | $-40M | $139M | $-173M | $107M |
| Gross Margin | 59.1% | — | 29.0% | 75.2% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | — | 16.5% | -27.2% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 29.9x | — | 30.9x | — | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $470M | $0.00 | $471M | $290M | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $488M | $103M | $131M | $103M | $636M |
TMDX vs AVXL vs STVN vs NVCR vs LIVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransMedics Group, … (TMDX) | 100 | 255.7 | +155.7% |
| Anavex Life Science… (AVXL) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
| Stevanato Group S.p… (STVN) | 100 | 94.1 | -5.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 10.7 | -89.3% |
| LivaNova PLC (LIVN) | 100 | 76.8 | -23.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TMDX vs AVXL vs STVN vs NVCR vs LIVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TMDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 382.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.4%
- 226.1% 10Y total return vs LIVN's 30.6%
- 37.1% revenue growth vs AVXL's -34.9%
- 27.0% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
AVXL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 11.60x
STVN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 31.7%, current ratio 1.74x
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LIVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.29
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.29 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
- +88.5% vs AVXL's -59.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% revenue growth vs AVXL's -34.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.5% vs AVXL's -59.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs AVXL's -30.0% |
TMDX vs AVXL vs STVN vs NVCR vs LIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TMDX vs AVXL vs STVN vs NVCR vs LIVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LIVN leads in 3 of 6 categories
TMDX leads 2 • AVXL leads 0 • STVN leads 0 • NVCR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIVN and AVXL operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. TMDX is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, TMDX holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $636M | $0 | $1.2B | $674M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | -$30M | $283M | -$165M | $220M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $172M | -$40M | $139M | -$173M | $107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $151M | -$34M | $16M | -$48M | $161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.1% | — | +29.0% | +75.2% | +67.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | — | +16.5% | -27.2% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | — | +11.8% | -25.7% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | — | +1.4% | -7.1% | +11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | — | +3.8% | +12.3% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.4% | +54.4% | -5.6% | -100.0% | +106.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LIVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, TMDX trades at a 55% valuation discount to STVN's 33.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LIVN's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TMDX's 18.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $310M | $5.2B | $1.9B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $207M | $5.6B | $2.1B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.97x | -6.19x | 33.04x | -13.52x | -14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.87x | — | 30.89x | — | 15.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.79x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.42x | — | 17.75x | — | 14.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | — | 3.88x | 2.86x | 2.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.25x | 3.00x | 2.97x | 5.40x | 3.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.86x | — | 206.15x | — | 20.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. STVN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMDX's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMDX scores 7/9 vs AVXL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.9% | -31.5% | +9.7% | -50.8% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.8% | -30.0% | +5.8% | -16.5% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.8% | — | +7.7% | -16.4% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | -47.8% | +9.5% | -28.9% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | — | 0.32x | 0.85x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | -$103M | $340M | $187M | -$162M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $488M | $103M | $131M | $103M | $636M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $470M | $0 | $471M | $290M | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.93x | — | 20.54x | -96.80x | 3.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIVN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMDX five years ago would be worth $32,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $852 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, LIVN leads with a +88.5% total return vs AVXL's -59.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIVN at 12.0% vs NVCR's -38.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.6% | -9.2% | -7.7% | +25.7% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.9% | -59.4% | -10.3% | +1.0% | +88.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.8% | -60.3% | -32.5% | -76.2% | +40.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.5% | -71.1% | -2.2% | -91.5% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +226.1% | -30.6% | -2.2% | +31.0% | +30.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | -26.5% | -12.3% | -38.1% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LIVN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIVN is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIVN currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs AVXL's 23.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.51x | 1.45x | 2.20x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $156.00 | $13.99 | $28.00 | $20.06 | $71.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.00 | $2.61 | $12.89 | $9.82 | $35.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.7% | +23.9% | +67.9% | +82.2% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.8 | 47.6 | 78.6 | 67.5 | 33.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.4M | 579K | 1.6M | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TMDX as "Buy", AVXL as "Buy", STVN as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", LIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 229.3% upside for AVXL (target: $11) vs 14.5% for LIVN (target: $76). STVN is the only dividend payer here at 0.32% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $144.75 | $11.00 | $24.50 | $33.50 | $75.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 13 | 8 | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.05 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
LIVN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). TMDX leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
TMDX vs AVXL vs STVN vs NVCR vs LIVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Stevanato Group S. p. A. (STVN). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN?
On trailing P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Stevanato Group S. p. A. at 33. 0x. On forward P/E, LivaNova PLC is actually cheaper at 15. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN?
Over the past 5 years, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) delivered a total return of +220. 5%, compared to -91. 5% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMDX returned +226. 1% versus AVXL's -30. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LivaNova PLC (LIVN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
29β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 70% more volatile than LIVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stevanato Group S. p. A. (STVN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 99% for TransMedics Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus 3. 2% for Stevanato Group S. p. A. (STVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransMedics Group, Inc. grew EPS 382. 2% year-over-year, compared to -483. 6% for LivaNova PLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMDX leads at 86. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN?
TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMDX leads at 17. 9% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LivaNova PLC (LIVN) trades at 15.
7x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Stevanato Group S. p. A. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVXL: 229. 3% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN?
In this comparison, STVN (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TMDX, AVXL, NVCR, LIVN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TMDX or AVXL or STVN or NVCR or LIVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LivaNova PLC (LIVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
29)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIVN: +30. 6%, NVCR: +31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TMDX and AVXL and STVN and NVCR and LIVN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TMDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.