Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB vs TRST vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB vs TRST vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $203M | $2.35B | $858M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $579M | $90M | $867M | $278M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $14M | $169M | $61M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 54.7% | 72.1% | 67.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 38.8% | 7.0% | 25.3% | 29.2% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 11.8x | 10.8x | 16.9x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $660M | $52M | $327M | $193M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $133M | $119M | $185M | $51M | $599M |
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB vs TRST vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tompkins Financial … (TMP) | 100 | 133.3 | +33.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB vs TRST vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.1%, EPS growth 126.2%
- 34.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 27.8% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.9% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 10.9% vs 2.0%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs TMP's 1.00, lower leverage
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs TRST's 2.6%
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.3% vs FIS's -35.3%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.31 vs TRST's 4.66
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 4.66
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TMP's 2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs TMP's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TMP's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 10.9% vs 2.0% |
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB vs TRST vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB vs TRST vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TMP leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. TMP is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $579M | $90M | $867M | $278M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $227M | $9M | $241M | $90M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $14M | $169M | $61M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $11M | $225M | $46M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.1% | +54.7% | +72.1% | +67.1% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +7.0% | +25.3% | +29.2% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +16.0% | +19.5% | +22.0% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +11.5% | +25.2% | +16.4% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +63.0% | +39.5% | +44.1% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TMP and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, TMP trades at a 88% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TMP offers better value at 0.46x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $203M | $2.4B | $858M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $136M | $2.5B | $1000M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.63x | 14.44x | 13.53x | 14.90x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.40x | 11.78x | 10.80x | 16.87x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | 2.85x | 1.92x | 4.11x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.84x | 15.28x | 10.35x | 11.14x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 2.25x | 2.71x | 3.08x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 1.09x | 1.21x | 1.29x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.69x | 19.55x | 10.75x | 18.75x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMP delivers a 19.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMP's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.9% | +7.8% | +9.5% | +8.9% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +7.2% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +0.6% | +2.4% | +2.8% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $527M | -$67M | $142M | $142M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $133M | $119M | $185M | $51M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $660M | $52M | $327M | $193M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.70x | 0.16x | 1.05x | 0.90x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.2% | +21.5% | +9.3% | +18.2% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.8% | +45.6% | +9.0% | +60.3% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.7% | +160.0% | +54.1% | +88.2% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.8% | +71.2% | +29.9% | +46.5% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.6% | +157.0% | +102.2% | +97.2% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.7% | +37.5% | +15.5% | +23.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TMP and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TMP's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TMP currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.46x | 0.89x | 0.75x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $86.95 | $22.62 | $46.92 | $49.11 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.67 | $12.83 | $39.20 | $30.17 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +93.2% | +96.1% | +98.6% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 63.7 | 57.3 | 64.5 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 40K | 236K | 112K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TMP and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TMP as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", TRST as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -13.7% for TMP (target: $74). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.00 | — | $46.00 | — | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +1.8% | +3.2% | +3.1% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 7 | 12 | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.52 | $0.37 | $1.43 | $1.51 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +3.1% | +0.4% | +4.4% | 0.0% |
TMP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TMP vs CZWI vs NBTB vs TRST vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the stronger pick with 34.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the cheapest at 7.
6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Tompkins Financial Corporation's 1. 00β — meaning TMP is approximately 117% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Tompkins Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is pulling ahead at 34.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tompkins Financial Corporation grew EPS 126. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS?
Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
8% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMP leads at 38. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TMP leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is TMP or CZWI or NBTB or TRST or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, TMP: +71. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TMP and CZWI and NBTB and TRST and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (TMP (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and TRST (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.