TMP vs NBTB

For growth investors, Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the stronger pick with 34.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the cheapest at 7.

6x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tompkins Financial Corporation wins at 0. 68x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to +21. 4% for Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus TMP's +66. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Tompkins Financial Corporation's 1. 00β — meaning TMP is approximately 12% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Tompkins Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is pulling ahead at 34.

1% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tompkins Financial Corporation grew EPS 126. 2% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

8% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMP leads at 38. 8% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TMP leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 68x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Tompkins Financial Corporation — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 1. 8% to $46. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 9% for Tompkins Financial Corporation (TMP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, TMP: +66. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.