Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TOST vs PAX vs BX vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
TOST vs PAX vs BX vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $17.02B | $1.92B | $95.85B | $89.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.45B | $384M | $13.83B | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $412M | $86M | $3.02B | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | 26.2% | 96.2% | 86.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 34.2% | 51.9% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 8.4x | 20.5x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $199M | $13.31B | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.35B | $54M | $2.63B | $6M |
TOST vs PAX vs BX vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | 100 | 58.8 | -41.2% |
| Patria Investments … (PAX) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 164.8 | +64.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOST vs PAX vs BX vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 2.75x
- 24.1% revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
- 13.8% ROA vs KKR's 0.6%, ROIC 30.8% vs 0.3%
PAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.09, yield 5.0%, current ratio 0.98x
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 23.7x)
- 22.3% margin vs TOST's 6.4%
- Beta 1.09 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 6.3%
- PEG 0.98 vs PAX's 2.99
- 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs BX's 476.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 23.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs TOST's 6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.9% vs TOST's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs KKR's 0.6%, ROIC 30.8% vs 0.3% |
TOST vs PAX vs BX vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOST vs PAX vs BX vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAX leads in 3 of 6 categories
TOST leads 1 • KKR leads 1 • BX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.3B annually — 50.2x PAX's $384M. PAX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOST's 6.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $384M | $13.8B | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $409M | $174M | $7.2B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $412M | $86M | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $654M | $268M | $3.5B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +96.2% | +86.0% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +34.2% | +51.9% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +22.3% | +21.8% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +67.3% | +12.6% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.9% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.5% | -40.5% | +41.3% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PAX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.3x trailing earnings, PAX trades at a 57% valuation discount to TOST's 52.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BX offers better value at 1.51x vs PAX's 7.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.0B | $1.9B | $95.8B | $89.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.7B | $2.1B | $106.5B | $144.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.43x | 22.30x | 31.53x | 42.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.69x | 8.42x | 20.50x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.92x | 1.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 42.22x | 15.74x | 14.77x | 20.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 5.01x | 6.93x | 4.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.39x | 3.00x | 4.37x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.99x | 7.44x | 54.93x | 9.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. TOST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KKR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOST scores 7/9 vs BX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.7% | +14.4% | +14.3% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.8% | +6.3% | +6.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +30.8% | +12.5% | +16.1% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.9% | +13.9% | +16.9% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.31x | 0.61x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $145M | $10.7B | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $54M | $2.6B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $199M | $13.3B | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.45x | 14.12x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KKR five years ago would be worth $17,648 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,697 for TOST. Over the past 12 months, PAX leads with a +14.9% total return vs TOST's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 27.6% vs PAX's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | -23.4% | -21.3% | -22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.4% | +14.9% | -6.5% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.7% | -1.4% | +65.9% | +107.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.0% | +5.4% | +59.0% | +76.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.0% | -19.3% | +476.1% | +715.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | -0.5% | +18.4% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PAX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAX is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAX currently trades 67.6% from its 52-week high vs TOST's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.09x | 1.53x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.66 | $17.80 | $190.09 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.35 | $10.86 | $101.73 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +67.6% | +64.3% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 54.1 | 54.8 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.9M | 885K | 7.1M | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BX and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TOST as "Buy", PAX as "Buy", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.5% upside for PAX (target: $18) vs 27.8% for BX (target: $156). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.30% vs KKR's 0.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.76 | $18.00 | $156.29 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 5 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.0% | +6.3% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 | $7.70 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +2.9% | +0.3% | +0.1% |
PAX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TOST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TOST vs PAX vs BX vs KKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOST or PAX or BX or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Toast, Inc.
(TOST) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Patria Investments Limited (PAX) offers the better valuation at 22. 3x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Toast, Inc. (TOST) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOST or PAX or BX or KKR?
On trailing P/E, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the cheapest at 22.
3x versus Toast, Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, Patria Investments Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Blackstone Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus Patria Investments Limited's 2. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOST or PAX or BX or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) delivered a total return of +76. 5%, compared to -53. 0% for Toast, Inc. (TOST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +715. 5% versus TOST's -53. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOST or PAX or BX or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
09β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 56% more volatile than PAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toast, Inc. (TOST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 67% for KKR & Co. Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOST or PAX or BX or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Toast, Inc.
(TOST) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to -28. 7% for KKR & Co. Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOST or PAX or BX or KKR?
Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
3% net margin versus 5. 6% for Toast, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAX leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOST or PAX or BX or KKR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Blackstone Inc. (BX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Patria Investments Limited's 2. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 23. 7x for Toast, Inc. — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAX: 49. 5% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOST or PAX or BX or KKR?
In this comparison, BX (6.
3% yield), PAX (5. 0% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TOST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TOST or PAX or BX or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 5. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAX: -19. 3%, TOST: -53. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOST and PAX and BX and KKR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOST (Technology) and PAX (Financial Services) and BX (Financial Services) and KKR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PAX, BX, KKR pay a dividend while TOST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.