Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TOST vs V vs MA vs PAX vs PYPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Asset Management
Financial - Credit Services
TOST vs V vs MA vs PAX vs PYPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Asset Management | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $17.02B | $616.45B | $443.44B | $1.92B | $40.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.45B | $40.00B | $32.79B | $384M | $33.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $412M | $22.24B | $15.57B | $86M | $5.06B |
| Gross Margin | 26.2% | 80.4% | 83.4% | 96.2% | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 60.0% | 59.2% | 34.2% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 24.6x | 25.5x | 8.4x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $25.17B | $19.00B | $199M | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.35B | $20.15B | $10.57B | $54M | $8.05B |
TOST vs V vs MA vs PAX vs PYPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | 100 | 58.8 | -41.2% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 144.1 | +44.1% |
| Patria Investments … (PAX) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 17.8 | -82.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOST vs V vs MA vs PAX vs PYPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
- 24.1% revenue growth vs PAX's 2.6%
V has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.68, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
- 50.1% margin vs TOST's 6.4%
MA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 437.2% 10Y total return vs V's 329.1%
- Beta 0.67 vs TOST's 1.44
- 29.5% ROA vs PAX's 6.3%, ROIC 56.5% vs 12.5%
PAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +14.9% vs PYPL's -32.3%
PYPL is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs PAX's 2.99
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 25.5x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.22
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs PAX's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 25.5x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs TOST's 6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs TOST's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PAX's 5.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.9% vs PYPL's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.5% ROA vs PAX's 6.3%, ROIC 56.5% vs 12.5% |
TOST vs V vs MA vs PAX vs PYPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOST vs V vs MA vs PAX vs PYPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PYPL leads in 1 of 6 categories
MA leads 1 • TOST leads 0 • V leads 0 • PAX leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — V and PAX each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 104.2x PAX's $384M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOST's 6.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $40.0B | $32.8B | $384M | $33.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $409M | $27.6B | $21.6B | $174M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $412M | $22.2B | $15.6B | $86M | $5.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $654M | $21.2B | $17.7B | $268M | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +80.4% | +83.4% | +96.2% | +46.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +60.0% | +59.2% | +34.2% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +50.1% | +45.6% | +22.3% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +53.9% | +51.6% | +67.3% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.9% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.5% | +35.3% | +21.2% | -40.5% | -6.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 84% valuation discount to TOST's 52.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.97x vs PAX's 7.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.0B | $616.4B | $443.4B | $1.9B | $40.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.7B | $621.5B | $451.9B | $2.1B | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.43x | 31.50x | 30.32x | 22.30x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.69x | 24.59x | 25.55x | 8.42x | 8.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.99x | 1.44x | 7.92x | 0.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 42.22x | 24.65x | 22.00x | 15.74x | 6.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 15.41x | 13.52x | 5.01x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.39x | 16.66x | 58.07x | 3.00x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.99x | 28.57x | 26.22x | 7.44x | 7.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $14 for PAX. TOST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.7% | +58.9% | +2.1% | +14.4% | +25.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.8% | +22.7% | +29.5% | +6.3% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +30.8% | +29.2% | +56.5% | +12.5% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.9% | +36.2% | +64.4% | +13.9% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.66x | 2.45x | 0.31x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $5.0B | $8.4B | $145M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $20.2B | $10.6B | $54M | $8.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $25.2B | $19.0B | $199M | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 26.72x | 27.23x | 7.45x | 19.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TOST and V each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, PAX leads with a +14.9% total return vs PYPL's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOST at 14.9% vs PYPL's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | -7.1% | -10.7% | -23.4% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.4% | -7.4% | -11.0% | +14.9% | -32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.7% | +41.2% | +32.2% | -1.4% | -38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.0% | +42.6% | +36.8% | +5.4% | -81.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.0% | +329.1% | +437.2% | -19.3% | +17.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +12.2% | +9.7% | -0.5% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — V and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TOST's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. V currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs PYPL's 58.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.68x | 0.67x | 1.09x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.66 | $375.51 | $601.77 | $17.80 | $79.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.35 | $293.89 | $480.50 | $10.86 | $38.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +85.6% | +83.2% | +67.6% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 53.3 | 42.3 | 54.1 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.9M | 6.9M | 3.2M | 885K | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — V and PAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TOST as "Buy", V as "Buy", MA as "Buy", PAX as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.5% upside for PAX (target: $18) vs 11.8% for PYPL (target: $52). For income investors, PAX offers the higher dividend yield at 5.00% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.76 | $362.45 | $656.87 | $18.00 | $51.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 61 | 64 | 5 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +0.6% | +5.0% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.36 | $3.07 | $0.60 | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +2.2% | +2.6% | +2.9% | +14.8% |
PYPL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
TOST vs V vs MA vs PAX vs PYPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Toast, Inc.
(TOST) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Toast, Inc. (TOST) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Toast, Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, Patria Investments Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PayPal Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus Patria Investments Limited's 2. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +42. 6%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +437. 2% versus TOST's -53. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Toast, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning TOST is approximately 115% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toast, Inc. (TOST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Toast, Inc.
(TOST) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Visa Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 5. 6% for Toast, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 5. 0% for TOST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAX leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Patria Investments Limited's 2. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Mastercard Incorporated — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAX: 49. 5% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL?
In this comparison, PAX (5.
0% yield), V (0. 7% yield), MA (0. 6% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TOST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TOST or V or MA or PAX or PYPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 0. 6% yield, +437. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +437. 2%, TOST: -53. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOST and V and MA and PAX and PYPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOST (Technology) and V (Financial Services) and MA (Financial Services) and PAX (Financial Services) and PYPL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock; PAX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. V, MA, PAX pay a dividend while TOST, PYPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.