Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.64B | $5.29B | $3.09B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $1.45B | $627M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $224M | $458M | $-398M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 65.6% | 5.8% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 36.0% | -84.2% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 10.8x | 10.3x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.12B | $1.20B | $641M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $668M | $910M | $380M | $52M |
TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.42 vs HOMB's 3.55
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- PEG 1.42 vs 3.55
- +32.5% vs HOMB's -1.9%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
SFNC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | PEG 1.42 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRMK leads 0 • HOMB leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.6x IBCP's $315M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.5B | $627M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $323M | $601M | -$497M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $224M | $458M | -$398M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $230M | $354M | $755M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.0% | +65.6% | +5.8% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +36.0% | -84.2% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +27.7% | -63.4% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +29.1% | +71.7% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +26.0% | +42.1% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SFNC and IBCP each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 22% valuation discount to HOMB's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $5.3B | $3.1B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $5.6B | $3.4B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.13x | 13.36x | -7.24x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.50x | 10.82x | 10.35x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.50x | 4.39x | — | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.49x | 10.12x | — | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 3.64x | 4.93x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 1.36x | 0.84x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.39x | 12.53x | 6.88x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +10.9% | -11.6% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +2.0% | -1.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +7.2% | -9.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +9.8% | -4.2% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.30x | 0.19x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $448M | $292M | $261M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $668M | $910M | $380M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $1.2B | $641M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 1.44x | -1.01x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | -3.0% | +14.6% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.5% | -1.9% | +16.7% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.5% | +42.0% | +53.4% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.6% | +6.6% | -15.4% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.7% | +58.2% | +25.2% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.8% | +12.4% | +15.3% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.82x | 1.02x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.99 | $30.83 | $22.18 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.39 | $25.68 | $17.00 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +87.1% | +96.3% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 50.3 | 62.3 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 392K | 1.4M | 1.2M | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs TRMK's 2.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.50 | $32.00 | $22.67 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 19 | 9 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.8% | +4.0% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 21 | 6 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.75 | $0.85 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
TRMK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 25% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is TRMK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRMK and HOMB and SFNC and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.